It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
What a load of crap!
originally posted by: nwtrucker
There is and was no Palestine.
In the same meeting Resolution 43/177 was adopted, in which the proclamation of the State of Palestine was acknowledged and the occupied Palestinian territories were called territories over which the Palestinian people should exercise sovereignty. The resolutions 43/176 and 43/177 were broadly supported by NGO's all over the world
originally posted by: nwtrucker
The U.N. is an obvious joke, 'International Law' is selectively applied.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
P.S.
You cite a Palestinian author.
Foreign immigrants? How about original Palestinians? Which the Jews also are?
One local African-American activist even called Jesus a 'Palestinian'.
There is and was no Palestine. The U.N. created it. (Far larger than now exists. which are now part of Jordan and Syria, which you disingenuously ignore.)
"Does the establishment of a Jewish state [in only part of Palestine] advance or retard the conversion of this country into a Jewish country? My assumption (which is why I am a fervent proponent of a state, even though it is now linked to partition) is that a Jewish state on only part of the land is not the end but the beginning... This is because this increase in possession is of consequence not only in itself, but because through it we increase our strength, and every increase in strength helps in the possession of the land as a whole. The establishment of a state, even if only on a portion of the land, is the maximal reinforcement of our strength at the present time and a powerful boost to our historical endeavors to liberate the entire country."
The U.N. is an obvious joke, 'International Law' is selectively applied.
The majority in Europe who arguably run the U.N. and the 'International Court' are still addicted to Saudi oil and have the bragging right of anti-Semitism which forced the creation of Israel in the first place.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
I don't have a problem with that....other than there are other views....by Palestinians, as well as Muslims that you omit in your 'objective' dissertation.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
If one isn't an activist, one looks at both sides and opines based on the evidence provided by each side.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
Obviously, your not inclined to do so.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
So here's a quick reality adjustment for you.
Israel will not be swayed by some popularity vote via social media.
Israel will not be swayed by a blatantly biased U.N. or "International Court" which even the U.S. hasn't signed on to.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: voyger2
There is and was no Palestine. The U.N. created it. (Far larger than now exists. which are now part of Jordan and Syria, which you disingenuously ignore.)
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: voyger2
I don't bother answering your queries as you have ignored most of the points in mine.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
As far as the U.N. creating a Palestine goes, Israel's response is identical as the 'Palestinian' response was the day Israel was created..."go forth and multiply".
What goes around, comes around. Deal with it..