It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: nonjudgementalist
Yes but they are not free when they have to live under the oppression of immoral adults as children.
Should an adult's freedom be at the expense of a child's moral foundation?
originally posted by: nonjudgementalist
I'm sure we all have our own definition. I gave you mine. If you don't want future generations to follow your example, its immoral.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: nonjudgementalist
You have no point, other than being overly concernded with what ADULTS do.
originally posted by: nonjudgementalist
So you would never stand up to a tyrant?
Are you coward?
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: nonjudgementalist
You have no point, other than being overly concernded with what ADULTS do.
It's exploitative, and this happens all over the place. That this is considered a popular and valid way to get an education is ridiculous.
originally posted by: corvuscorrax
Seems you're the one stuck on 'not telling adults what to do'
originally posted by: hknudzkknexnt
a reply to: nonjudgementalist
This is discussing the pigs who use their money to sneak into the beds of our youth
the youth are for the youth
# off with the grabbing
i just don't believe in generational mixing
originally posted by: nonjudgementalist
Not really.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Aazadan
It's exploitative, and this happens all over the place. That this is considered a popular and valid way to get an education is ridiculous.
If they are two consenting adults how is anyone being exploited?