It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Or denying MEDICAL TREATMENT based on religious based bias?
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: chuck258
The more LGBT calls for special protections, the more resistant people are going to be, because they are going to feel they are being told what they can and cannot do.
What "special protections" are LGBT calling for? What "special protections" have they called for in the past? And finally, how do you feel about the actual special protections that religious people GET in this country, like the ability turn people away, because one is "religious"?
Apparently not merely preaching to the choir, as at least as many (including you) have arisen to combat any so-called bashing.
Since you obviously view yourself as a more fair-minded person than anyone who would stoop to "bashing" the poor, maligned, overwhelming Christian majority in this country ... isn't your own critique of that group you perceive as uniformly attacking a bit ... hypocritical? I mean, you're pointing a judgmental finger at us for pointing a judgmental finger at the Christians ... no?
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
originally posted by: grandmakdw
When it comes to Christians, remember
all the old testament scriptures you twisted
are swept away by the words of Jesus.
Jesus command sweeps away the Old Testament,
and the New Testament superscedes the Old.
Jesus said for Christians to love, so for Christians
you need to replace the world love for kill, etc
in all of your passages. Because Jesus did away
with the ugliness you say we think, and put
love in it's place. That was His command.
Find where Jesus said or did anything that
would support your little rant and that
Christ followers should do any of the above
and you will have credibility.
The actual words of Jesus or actions of Jesus.
That is who Christians follow. Jesus. who
swept away the old and brought in the new,
love. Not the words of Paul or others, but
the actual words of Jesus and/or His actual
actions.
Otherwise, this is a typical response of a paranoid delusional
anti-theist when it comes to Christians.
Wooooo watch out the
Christian boogie man cometh!
Lock the doors, pull the shades
or a Christian might get you.
BOO
That is why your paraphrase of old testament
passages are so twisted and distorted of their
meaning for the majority of them.
The product of a bigoted, prejudiced,
intolerant anti-theist mind who projects
their own hatred into the passages, and projecting
these onto Christians, when Christ said to substitute
love for hate and told His followers to do the same.
You also forget Jesus never said any of those things
he ate with prostitutes, people who stole, outcasts
of society and told his followers to love everyone.
Not to kill. So find a passage where Jesus said any of
these things you are so gleeful and took such rage filled
time to find and I might find you not full of anger
rage and hate and paranoid delusion when it comes
to Christians.
People need to be free to not believe
and to believe
in the US.
People need to be free to not practice religion
or to practice religion,
that is in our constitution.
Of course, the anti-theist paranoid delusional
movement doesn't believe the constitution
applies to people of faith.
Tolerance only goes one way as an anti-theist
tolerant toward all who renounce religion,
intolerance for those who wish to practice
religion.
That's what this entire thread is really about.
Not the bill itself
but freedom from the oppressive
and intolerant anti-theist who does not want
to allow people to practice their faith outside
of their homes and the shades must be drawn,
or outside of their places of worship and
they must sneak in and not let anyone know
they are there. That is the anti-theist version
of freedom of religion, that is why such
irrational fear and intolerance of a bill that
tries to protect that freedom.
So in one breath you admit that Jesus Christ taught love and tolerance, that he associated with the less savory and loved them just as much as his apostles.
Then in the next breath you somehow use this to justify denying other human beings. Not just services- such as a wedding cake- but the adoption of children and the receipt of needed medical treatment.
I'm not the anti-theist boogey man. I embrace all religions, all my fellow humans. I've read the words of Jesus. It truly saddens me when people use his teachings to justify the shunning, the scorn and the discrimination against others. I can just picture a tear streaking down his cheek in response to this hatefulness.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: grandmakdw
Refusing others based on your religion is not practicing it, it is forcing it on others. Your rights end where mine begin, don't like it? Get out of the public sector. I would be willing to bet they don't mind taking the help of the tax payer for thier business without caring where that money comes from.
You practice it at home or in your place of worship.
Oh and save the "the OT doesn't apply to Christians" you guys follow the 10 commandments right? Isn't that part of the US is a Christian nation argument, that our laws are based on those commandments?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: grandmakdw
So please tell me why this bill has been brought forth. Is it because Christians don't want to do business with gays or any "gay behavior"? Why is that, when Jesus didn't say anything against gays? Why would Christian's religious views preclude them from doing business with gays? Why would there be a law to allow people to follow a religious view that doesn't even exist, according to Jesus?
originally posted by: grandmakdw
I embrace all religions and all fellow humans.
I am not justifying scorning anyone.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
paranoid delusional anti-theist
bigoted, prejudiced, intolerant anti-theist mind
the anti-theist paranoid delusional movement
oppressive and intolerant anti-theist
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: SlapMonkey
Is that rationality I see? And I had almost given up for a moment there.
You sure you don't want to drag some Christians over the coals first? Everybody's doing it.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Metallicus
As a champion of personal freedom above all else, who are you to say what is an inappropriate attraction for any one but yourself?
That seems like a deeply conflicted position to hold, honestly.
I certainly support their right to participate in their homosexual activities, just as I support abortion rights and legal marijuana, however I still consider those things all to be poor decisions and fundamentally wrong behaviors.
Just curious why you find homosexuality to be fundamentally wrong? No one is killing or harming anyone. There are no victims. Being a homosexual doesn't mean you can't be financially successful, or that you can't do good deeds for others. What is fundamentally wrong about it?
I believe it to be immoral behavior and a crime against nature. That being said there are many things people do that I find disgusting that aren't illegal. I simply avoid people with incompatible lifestyles and behaviors in my personal life. However, I would totally bake their gay wedding cake if that were my job. As a professional person I am able to maintain a professional relationship with clients and customers.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
There was a time, mostly in the South, when private businesses who had an openly offensive and bigoted business model did just fine. They were eventually forced to do things with their private property that they didn't want to do. Guess what? They got over it, or they got out of that business. And when they died, the next generation just understood that they weren't going to be allowed to have that business model. And the next generation after that wouldn't have even thought about having that business model.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Actually, if "we" in your comment is referring to the general public, "we" do have a right to shop at public businesses.
If someone doesn't want to cater to the public (as in, the entire public without unfair discrimination) then they should offer their services through a private club model and require membership.
There's no reference here, as far as I am aware, to asking not to be "offended by someone's beliefs" ... good gravy, I'd be in a constant state of offense ... the only thing I see here is an insistence for equal treatment before the laws.
originally posted by: thinline
Florida wants to pass an adoption law that mirrors evolution. So does that make evolution is so homophobic or just anti-gay?
The state should follow evolution's lead and only give kids to a man and a women. Not a single man, not a single women, not two women, and not two men. I am sorry, I shouldn't be talking about evolution on this page, I should follow the hate for religion theme.
So many bitter people on ATS. Some say religion brings peace and reduced the bitterness, just sayin....
originally posted by: skeptikal1
I'm sorry, but your post appears to be just another example of the illogical, hysterical, and politically driven nonsense that we hear so often from the lunatic fringe of the left. It is clear that religiously based medical facilities should not be required to treat individuals who's behavior is in conflict with the tenet of their religions, except on an emergency basis. There are plenty of secular facilities available to provide these services.
originally posted by: skeptikal1
a reply to: [post=19969398]Darth_Prime[/
I'm sorry, but your post appears to be just another example of the illogical, hysterical, and politically driven nonsense that we hear so often from the lunatic fringe of the left. It is clear that religiously based medical facilities should not be required to treat individuals who's behavior is in conflict with the tenet of their religions, except on an emergency basis. There are plenty of secular facilities available to provide these services.