Who here has Dragon Vision(Dragon-Sight/Eyes)?

a reply to: trifecta

Wasn't really put forth as a question as to what You've "seen"... I know full well...more or less.The statement was posited as a prelude to the faucet of thought You touched on,Of the resistance of the information by those that do not/can not/refuse to see and if You may have saw something differently that could be championed as a effective tutoring tool to bestow it unto others.

Friends and family will be the first to condemn, Even when confronted with proof or witnessing "after effects"...nothing short of seeing what You see exactly ,will convince anyone. My stumbling block is: this isn't a learned skill or one that can be shared.You're born with it.While it can be built upon and focused if You do have it ,I haven't met anyone yet personally that can grasp it and make it their own if they already don't have it. words are often twisted by the unseen before they reach the recipients and makes any endeavor to teach it futile. It's all about perspective and the eye of the beholder. people need confirmation. absolute truth before they will consider it valid.

You got confirmation.You're not crazy and I'll be watching the thread.



Edit: @TechniXcality Reg numbers= Your ATS forum registration time. when you signed up here...everything is connected...

originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: trifecta

ok alright, toilet humor has a place in reality, does dragons and dragon sight?

"reg numbers" i have no idea what this means please elaborate thanks...

Nobody spoke of dragons....yet. Dragon Sight, for all you know can just simply be a metaphor. Dragons, technically do have a place in reality. It is in our consciousness actively. You only need to turn to entertainment, heraldry, and legend to see it's corporeal. Thought is energy. Energy is matter. Just because you cannot see of touch an idea or concept, does this mean it can't or doesn't exist? We all know that quantum particles, electrons, positrons, muons exist with a certain degree of confidence, no? But unless you are ogling down an electron microscope, all of that license is nebulous. You can't necessarily see or practically touch that matter, exclusively, but we trust certain peer outlets.

If someone has Snowy Vision, which is a certified ocular condition in medical journals, but you can't see the static as they do, do this mean beyond a shred of doubt, it's non-existent? Some things are unquantifiable and immeasurable by contemporary standards and device. Are you quick to be judge, jury, and executioner to concepts outside of your box? Thirty years ago common folk would have conscripted you onto a mental institution if you told them Invisibility tech was possible. Today, not only is it possible, but they've just announce its fraternal companion of being invisible to "touch". Crazy huh?

originally posted by: SynchronousSnake
a reply to: trifecta

Wasn't really put forth as a question as to what You've "seen"... I know full well...more or less.The statement was posited as a prelude to the faucet of thought You touched on,Of the resistance of the information by those that do not/can not/refuse to see and if You may have saw something differently that could be championed as a effective tutoring tool to bestow it unto others.

Friends and family will be the first to condemn, Even when confronted with proof or witnessing "after effects"...nothing short of seeing what You see exactly ,will convince anyone. My stumbling block is: this isn't a learned skill or one that can be shared.You're born with it.While it can be built upon and focused if You do have it ,I haven't met anyone yet personally that can grasp it and make it their own if they already don't have it. words are often twisted by the unseen before they reach the recipients and makes any endeavor to teach it futile. It's all about perspective and the eye of the beholder. people need confirmation. absolute truth before they will consider it valid.

You got confirmation.You're not crazy and I'll be watching the thread.



Edit: @TechniXcality Reg numbers= Your ATS forum registration time. when you signed up here...everything is connected...

So do you feel the breath on your neck? The static brush against your skin? The bobbing heads mantled on your walls? Does it gently feed from your hand and appendage? Do you feel the thread tugged beneath your skin? Flowery yes, but is this meaningful to you? And if so, may I PM you?

I think We both know the answer to that. on both counts. PM if You wish.More work needs to be done here to locate others however. This is unprecedented within these circles...and If I'm not mistaken has not been took to this scale as of date. There's a lot of anticipation goin on now since You have opened the door. I can feel it.

a reply to: trifecta

Ok please tell me your interpretation of my "reg-numbers" and what they mean thanks.

a reply to: Atsbhct

Who has studied this? And why is it called Dragon Vision when dragon's are mythical and not real? How would any human know what a dragon sees, when a) they aren't dragons and b) dragons aren't real?

originally posted by: SynchronousSnake
a reply to: trifecta
Friends and family will be the first to condemn,

I absolutely love the irony!

originally posted by: noonebutme
a reply to: Atsbhct

Who has studied this? And why is it called Dragon Vision when dragon's are mythical and not real? How would any human know what a dragon sees, when a) they aren't dragons and b) dragons aren't real?

Its actually one of the most encompassing conspiracy theories out there, even inspiring (in part) big budget movies and books.

Its absolutely fascinating stuff, with lineage playing a big part, about a war for control or guidance.

a reply to: Serdgiam

So was the terrible film, "I, Frankenstein" and the entire terrible Twilight saga. But it's not real.

I won't say I'm a conspiracy fanatic, but I have heard of few strange propositions -- but "Dragon Vision" is not one of them.

Please.... don't say this is to do with "dragonkin". I've heard of mentally challenged people who associate themselves as (something)-kin and it's pathetic. If that's where this links up to them it's complete b*ll*cks.

I see Dead People....

a reply to: noonebutme

I made no claims of validity.

You can research it or not, that's not my concern. I suppose it could link to dragonkin, so there is your excuse to look no further!

You made it sound like its some obscure thing that no one has looked into.. that assertion is demonstrably false. We just don't read much about it on ATS, but that shouldn't be a huge surprise.

What has been discussed here so far is relatively inaccurate, fwiw. At least when compared to what has come straight from a "dragons" mouth. Especially the new age connotations.

It might very well be "complete bollocks," but the influence of the connected topics on everyone's life is undeniable.

Averice? What was inherently greedy or materialistic about what I said? Fishing for responses is my thing aswell. You have provided nothing substantial and neither has anyone else in this thread.

Perhaps a description on how these supposed powers came to be or how you aquired them and how they might be useful to you or others that are experiencing.

Seeing orbs and strange Möbius bands seems hardly of any use and would be straining and take away from the waking reality. You could be captivated by some funky quantum floating expression and just get hit by a car!







a reply to: trifecta

originally posted by: noonebutme
a reply to: Atsbhct

Who has studied this? And why is it called Dragon Vision when dragon's are mythical and not real? How would any human know what a dragon sees, when a) they aren't dragons and b) dragons aren't real?

Why are you asking me? I think I made it clear that I'm a non-believer.

a reply to: trifecta



I wear sings and signals, some branded.

I wore the name and all that, now I node. Watch. Move the story forward.

It moves beyond the second to the constant here and now...right now, all the time...the affliction and blessing.

I have embraced such for a good long season.

Cheers, lol some of the comments to jest and snarl.

The thunderous timbre in this thread on the validity of this extra sensory bellows deep. Many empirical professions trumpet loud. The confidence and narrowed-mindedness climbs the vertex reaching pious peaks and pinnacle primrose. Yes, this is a very rare and coveted subject being measured and weight by the boundful. No all that comfortable to indulge, due to the sleight and skewer weathered by such ideas and notions, fringe and phantasmagoric. But in all due time, more will reveal itself. Here on ATS or out there in the Umbra.

originally posted by: Treespeaker
a reply to: trifecta

I wear sings and signals, some branded.

I wore the name and all that, now I node. Watch. Move the story forward.

It moves beyond the second to the constant here and now...right now, all the time...the affliction and blessing.

I have embraced such for a good long season.

Cheers, lol some of the comments to jest and snarl.

Sounds like lyrics to a band I'm familiar with....

a reply to: trifecta

I wouldn't know.

I have an autistic need to learn all the time.

What's next is my charm, lol.

Born this way, and blending in very nicely thank you.

Lol.