Why Trump over Hillary?

Very simple. Trump isn’t espousing NAZI neocon madness as Hillary is that will bring the world to sure destruction.

Trump is espousing common sense foreign policy of getting along with Putin in exterminating religious gangsters such as ISIS.

Hillary is espousing common neocon, Zionist madness of confrontation. Also she is 100 percent down with the sinister plot to destroy 7 nations within the ME.

Trump has indirectly castigated this well-known (amongst the elite) notorious genocidal policy

Trump is a Rand Paul without the crazy conservative, libertarian economics that want to starve people and let greedy capitalists kill us with overwork and deadly products.

Trump understands the reality that in a post-modern era of cooperative economics there has to be viable macro economic safeguards for the poor.

Trump with a connection to our conservative population may be able to better unify the country than Hillary and her extreme polarization policies.

The only caveat regarding Trump may be his over the top too extreme immigration policy. But likely the Democrats will be able to balance that policy if Trump becomes president.

Bottom line, IF Trump is sincere he may be the only person that can save the world from a certain WWIII….

On the other hand Hillary Clinton has proven to be NOTHING BUT a direct puppet of the NEOCON Zionist sinister plot to embroil the world in WWIII and a devastating unnecessary war of civilizations that will bring the world to its knees.

So in the spirit of the proverbial lesser of two evils, I believe as of now Donald Trump will be a better president for the US and the world.

I’ll enjoy comments by those who agree, differ or don’t yet have an opinion.

a reply to: Willtell

I personally feel a Trump or Sanders presidency will start a civil war among us.

One wants to end hand outs and the other wants to give out more.

I would rather have Trump over Clinton or Sanders, but as of now, I'm going with Dr. Carson.

a reply to: Willtell

In the past I have voted for republicans and I have voted for democrats. Both have disappointed me. Now? Not sure I'm going to vote at all.
I learned that if I don't depend on government for my general welfare, then I'm never disappointed by who is in office. I do have opinions, though. Hillary is corrupt and evil. Trump? I try to like him but I think he keeps shooting himself in the foot. The more he talks, the less I'm impressed.

You very well could be right except for the fact that Trump has alienated the minorities, women, and the millennials.

I don't think he has a chance of getting elected without their support. I also don't think he will get the GOP nomination for one of the reasons you stated....He isn't a neocon. The RNC is however.

Who do you think the Electoral College actually works for? The electorate?

Do you want a turd or a booger? Pick your poison.

Do you have to pick either of those clowns?

a reply to: Willtell

I tend to look at a candidate's record -- and ignore what comes out of their mouths -- and Trump's record is all over the place. He's either a plant or he has ZERO core political values.

In fact, the records of all the 'contenders' suck.

If I vote, it won't be for anyone in the two major parties.

Hillary is more "do nothing government". Hillary as President will be a YAWN fest except maybe Bill might die over next 8 years, he not looking acting so healthy. Trump will change America and the world. I don't agree with all his policies but I believe it is time for America to have a serious non politician in there to clean it up, expose it and change it.

We need now more than ever a non career politician and true leader to go in there and "Make America Great Again".

originally posted by: olaru12
You very well could be right except for the fact that Trump has alienated the minorities, women, and the millennials.

I don't think he has a chance of getting elected without their support. I also don't think he will get the GOP nomination for one of the reasons you stated....He isn't a neocon. The RNC is however.

Who do you think the Electoral College actually works for? The electorate?

It is interesting how Trump suddenly went balls-deep on immigration.

Republicans won Florida by only 537 votes, in 2000, and since then the hispanic population of Florida has grown by 50%.

It makes it hard to believe that any serious campaign advisor, with a general election in mind, would tell Trump it was a good idea make the issue central to his campaign -- and be super-crass about it.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Its a sad day for all of us when the only way to become President is to kiss the asses of illegal immigrants.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: olaru12
You very well could be right except for the fact that Trump has alienated the minorities, women, and the millennials.

I don't think he has a chance of getting elected without their support. I also don't think he will get the GOP nomination for one of the reasons you stated....He isn't a neocon. The RNC is however.

Who do you think the Electoral College actually works for? The electorate?

It is interesting how Trump suddenly went balls-deep on immigration.

Republicans won Florida by only 537 votes, in 2000, and since then the hispanic population of Florida has grown by 50%.

It makes it hard to believe that any serious campaign advisor, with a general election in mind, would tell Trump it was a good idea make the issue central to his campaign -- and be super-crass about it.

I doubt if this kind of BS is going to win back the Hispanics like he claimed.

www.facebook.com...

10-4 the professional politicians are an inherent screw-up.....logic wise, huh!
the most important starting point in this decision, huh!

originally posted by: Bone75
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Its a sad day for all of us when the only way to become President is to kiss the asses of illegal immigrants.

Well, he could speak on the issue without alienating legal Hispanics, if he wanted to.

Not alienating important voter blocs is kind of important to winning elections. Especially when it comes to a major swing state like Florida.

I'd pick Trump, he won't push feminism as the new man appeal.

Men are men women are women. And she is anything but that, plus she lies like a drunken sailor.

Hillary is, or was, too poor and dependent on the elite. She is their super puppet.

Possibly, but I admit unlikely, Trump because he is a rich boy like Kennedy was may be some degree of independent.


That's all we got folks...the ugly duckling or the snake.

That's all we ever get.

Sanders isn't giving us hand outs, he wants citizens to start getting back what every American pays into the government every year! How convenient republicans ignore the trillion and billions of handouts given to the military complex year after year without any kind of complaints from congress. The trillions spent on black projects. How much of our tax dollars have gone to corporate bail outs? Not only that, how many times has our government double and triple taxed the American public? It's a fact the wealthy actually pay less as a proportion of their income than the rest of us! What about corporate welfare? What about the billions of dollars in foreign aid? What about our millionaire representatives who receive the best healthcare on the backs of the very same taxpayers who may not have it, nor can they even come close to comparing the coverage? How about our representatives outrageous average salaries of 174,000 dollars a year? No term limits and they use their political position as a lifetime career!!! No wonder a majority of them stay in office well into their 70"s!

These are the same representatives who want to cut social security after millions of Americans have paid into it their entire life! The reason why Social Security isn't solvent is because your representatives embezzled money out of the Social Security fund! Any private citizen would be receiving jail time if they did the same thing.

Representatives also want to deny citizens healthcare coverage when they"re receiving the best policies money can buy!!
Are we blind to the fact that every industrial nation has government subsidized health care? A lot of them run more efficient, and costs much less than America's health care system. Too many people believe the propaganda surrounding government subsidized health care. I don't hear nor see a major uprising in countries that have this system. Most can't believe we put our lives in the hands of private insurance companies who are in it for profit!

Colleges are putting a generation of kids into a lifetime of debt. Pretty soon colleges are going to price themselves right out of the market. Not only that, it's going to be one of the main factors in a U.S. economic collapse. Really, what is wrong with having the government fund college education? Education is what makes an economy strong and people who get an education give back 10 fold to a country's economy. Without education, a country has absolutely nothing and will cause it to diminish to a 3rd world country status!! It's about time conservatives realize the importance of education funding.

What I here on ATS absolutely astounds me! Some members here complained about government programs that are helping citizens, like social security, Medicare, food stamps and welfare. These are vital benefits. Yeah, I said food stamps and welfare. Every country needs a safety net for their citizens. Do these welfare programs need an overhaul to help cut out waste, misuse, and forcing welfare recipients to earn the checks they receive, absolutely!! But lets not shoot ourselves in the foot people! We're our own worst enemy! We act like cheerleaders when the U.S. government spends more on defense than the next seven countries combined!!! That's ok, but let's ignore the very same people who sacrifice their own children to defend this country! Government was not only created to protect it's people, but it was also created for public service.

Oh, and for those who say government can't run anything right... Social Security has been the most successful program in American history. Without it, was a miserable descent into poverty. Medicare is also a government program that is extremely popular.

a reply to: Willtell
I'm not voting for the witch Hillary until she drives a car, and quits wearing pajamas. My vote will go toward Sanders for now.

a reply to: WeRpeons
Sanders has a few positives like he is against the TPP but the rest of his agenda will cause major problems for a majority of America. $15 min wage will decimate small business and cause major increases in All of our cost of living! Though he is not anti gun to the extent of Hillary he still has a questionable stance on the 2nd Anne spent. He has used Sweden as a positive example of Democratic Socialism but I've read several blogs and articles that suggest Swedens socialistic way of life is not so positive! Add to all that free college for all and you have to expect co spiders ly higher taxes and/or debt for us all! The U.S. Govt is too involved in every aspect of our lives and they have shown they are not very good managers of that involvement! No Clintons, no bushes, and no sanders for this guy!

a reply to: Willtell

I never thought I'd see Trump being called a better version of Rand Paul. Never.

a reply to: olaru12

They will put Jeb in that slot,JUST like they did McCain.