It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There can be no "moderate" terrorists, President Putin said, speaking about the situation in the Middle East at the Valdai discussion forum.
"Why play with words dividing terrorists into moderate and not moderate. What's the difference?" Putin told the forum.
A whole "snarl" of terrorist groups act in the region, who fight also against each other for "sources of income" and not for ideology, Putin said, adding that the weapons provided to "moderate" opposition in the region had ended up in the hands of terrorists.
Some countries are playing a double game, the Russian president said, adding that while they fight against terrorism they also "place figures on the board" in their own interests.
I can't tell the difference between a "moderate" or "radical" rebels. They all are terrorists, it's just all a play on words to make Assad look bad. The same kind of picture that paint on Putin as well...
I made a thread on this earlier, Syrian Crisis: The Game of Terrorists
There is a possibility that US anti-missile shield bases in Eastern Europe might be used for offensive weapons, the president said, adding that it may be regarded as a threat to Russia. A dialogue on limitation of strategic nuclear forces should be continued, Putin added.
"This is a very dangerous scenario, harmful for all, including the United States itself," the Russian president told the forum.
There can be no winner in conflicts involving nuclear weapons, the Russian leader said.
Trade and sanctions wars show “unfair competition” on the US side, the Russian president said, commenting on current political and economic relations in the world. Moral norms should be considered in international, political, military and economic rivalry, Putin said, adding that otherwise the competition could get out of control.
“Russia could also declare the necessity to democratize the USA, but that would, at a minimum, be impolite,” Putin told the discussion forum.
I just wondering what the US response is going to be on this one?
There is a possibility that US anti-missile shield bases in Eastern Europe might be used for offensive weapons
originally posted by: markosity1973
Oh it gets much worse than that....
I just came across a gem from the BBC and posted it in this thread www.abovetopsecret.com...
The USA and the UK are now openly calling for more support for their 'moderate' terrorists.
At the end of this war I want to see the USA and all of it's partner who supply and arm these evil SOB's dragged to the Hague and strung up for war crimes against humanity. Yes Obama and Cameron I want to see you pay for the crimes you have committed in the name of the western world.
`
originally posted by: InnerPeace2012
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Nit picking I see. That doesn't make the rest of his comments irrelevant does it? He only mentioned the possibility of this systems turned into offensive weapons, was what I understand from his comments.
Are you sure, you believe it's all defensive missile shields? We can never know what intelligence infor he has on this so called defensive missile systems.
Peace
So you are saying they cant be used on aircraft that fly near the border of a country that has these anti-missile weapons. That it is impossible for them to take down an aircraft and can only work against missiles.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
There is a possibility that US anti-missile shield bases in Eastern Europe might be used for offensive weapons
Right off the bat more propaganda, that isnt even possible......thats not how the missile shield system functions.....it cant function offensively
Love how people just eat up whatever he says like its gospel