It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- For years, varied and sometimes wild claims have been made about the origins of a group of dark-skinned Appalachian residents once known derisively as the Melungeons. Some speculated they were descended from Portuguese explorers, or perhaps from Turkish slaves or Gypsies.
Now a new DNA study in the Journal of Genetic Genealogy attempts to separate truth from oral tradition and wishful thinking. The study found the truth to be somewhat less exotic: Genetic evidence shows that the families historically called Melungeons are the offspring of sub-Saharan African men and white women of northern or central European origin.
And that report, which was published in April in the peer-reviewed journal, doesn't sit comfortably with some people who claim Melungeon ancestry.
"There were a whole lot of people upset by this study," lead researcher Roberta Estes said. "They just knew they were Portuguese, or Native American."
Beginning in the early 1800s, or possibly before, the term Melungeon (meh-LUN'-jun) was applied as a slur to a group of about 40 families along the Tennessee-Virginia border. But it has since become a catch-all phrase for a number of groups of mysterious mixed-race ancestry.
www.huffingtonpost.com...
originally posted by: Spider879
First Off the above is a great example of why we need a history forum as it does not fit in the ancient Civ forum or neatly fit into the Social Issues box..ATS brass are U guyz paying attention.
originally posted by: butcherguy
As for me, I figure that we can't pick our ancestors. I yam what I yam.
The study quotes from an 1874 court case in Tennessee in which a Melungeon woman's inheritance was challenged. If Martha Simmerman were found to have African blood, she would lose the inheritance.
Her attorney, Lewis Shepherd, argued successfully that the Simmerman's family was descended from ancient Phoenicians who eventually migrated to Portugal and then to North America.
Writing about his argument in a memoir published years later, Shepherd stated, "Our Southern high-bred people will never tolerate on equal terms any person who is even remotely tainted with negro blood, but they do not make the same objection to other brown or dark-skinned people, like the Spanish, the Cubans, the Italians, etc."
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: ketsuko
I can see why people would get upset.
As for me, I figure that we can't pick our ancestors. I yam what I yam.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: ketsuko
I can see why people would get upset.
As for me, I figure that we can't pick our ancestors. I yam what I yam.
originally posted by: odzeandennz
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: ketsuko
I can see why people would get upset.
As for me, I figure that we can't pick our ancestors. I yam what I yam.
classy... but explain why, not people, but certain people would get upset?
because i cant see why....
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: Spider879
First Off the above is a great example of why we need a history forum as it does not fit in the ancient Civ forum or neatly fit into the Social Issues box..ATS brass are U guyz paying attention.
I don't know if starting a Racism Forum is a good move.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: odzeandennz
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: ketsuko
I can see why people would get upset.
As for me, I figure that we can't pick our ancestors. I yam what I yam.
classy... but explain why, not people, but certain people would get upset?
because i cant see why....
I don't know. Why do you think Elizabeth Warren got so upset when it was discovered that her Native American ancestry was based solely on old family tales and not on any reliable genealogical fact?
Why would she have been so upset?