“stunning Martian god”

Martian gods had nice hooters.
Pink, brown, or green? That is the question.

Wow you can photoshop rocks, why is this news?

It looks like its just been switched to B&W, and Maybe had the contrast adjusted... I wouldn't call that "enhanced" or "photoshopped". A lot of photographers like to shoot things in B&W because it brings out certain features.

Blast those photographers for trying to fool us all with their photoshopped enhancements... Suuuure, Ansel Adams... you expect me to believe that's a bridge, when its clearly a rock? Pshhhh...

We have no way to know the scale of this object. But statues are often smaller or larger than lifesize. And if its a Vesuvian style fossil, of a martian humanoid, well, it would make sense that they would be a different size on Mars.

In a likelyhood, it is Probably not a statue or fossil. But some of the reasons given for why it must be "rocks" simply defy logic. I think its at the Very least, interesting. Its not just a "face", but a whole torso, with breasts, and some kind of chair or throne with flat back and straight edge on the side, creating the appearance of an arm rest. Pretty cool! The facial features are distinct, even on the original color version.

originally posted by: 3n19m470
It looks like its just been switched to B&W, and Maybe had the contrast adjusted... I wouldn't call that "enhanced" or "photoshopped". A lot of photographers like to shoot things in B&W because it brings out certain features.

It's admitted to being enhanced and processed.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

DOH! well of course its enhanced.... how else would they get tiitties like that in the lower gravity?

The one thing that seems to be giving most people fits is that they admit it has been enhanced, oddly enough that is what gives jt so much more credibility to me. Most hoaxers would not admit to that as it automatically causes distrust.