Islamist forces gathering near Houston, legit or BS?

originally posted by: Demonarch
a reply to: TechniXcality

Because calling out the horseshyte of Nazarene religion and pointing out that its Judaic roots makes one a bigot, and this coming from the fella who was talking about getting the whites organized while backpedaling that "oh no, I'm not a nazi".

actually, i don't think jesus had judaic roots but was egyptian by birth and a descendant of king david, who was a hyksos pharaoh. and if you want to get technical, and go even further back, there's that wee lil bit about ancient sumer.

originally posted by: undo
actually, i don't think jesus had judaic roots

The cognitive dissonance is strong with this one. Check your inbox, bro.

a reply to: Demonarch

there is nothing wrong with having pride in your race, there is something wrong with calling our women "ho's" and you didnt read what i said with undo evidently, good try.

a reply to: TechniXcality

Those involved with that shill podcast are "the ho's of their pimp Jesus Christ", someone evidently has problems with metaphors. Or maybe I was just being too "street" my apologies if my allusions flew straight over your suburbanite head. learn2metaphor, boss.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

OK, so you take the story of Adam and Eve literally and believe that the Biblical god and Quranic god are one and the same. Not dissing, I just understand what you base your spiritual decision on.

originally posted by: Demonarch
a reply to: enlightenedservant

OK, so you take the story of Adam and Eve literally and believe that the Biblical god and Quranic god are one and the same. Not dissing, I just understand what you base your spiritual decision on.

atum is adam. atum being the "creator" god of egypt named the people he cloned, after himself. atum/adam was known in sumer as alulim, the first king on the sumerian kings list. alulim was later called elohim.

these are all plural words as well. so adam wasn't one guy. atum wasn't one guy. alulim and elohim, weren't singular.

a reply to: TechniXcality

Btw TechniXcality, I have no personal beef with you, I believe we merely got off on the wrong foot. I can tell that you're not a dumbass by not buying into the overly-simplistic "blame teh j00s" excuse designed by shill media like RedIce to confuse the white race as to who's on the highest rung of the totem pole. My acerbic language was merely meant to get in the face of the shill whites who get kickbacks from covertly supporting the Nazarene socio-religious powers.

undo, did you receive my messages or did I fukk up with my PMing? All this talk of Egyptians and cloning sounds like a good yarn to spin via private message.

atum is adam
as
anunnaki is anunna.

a reply to: Demonarch

well check your pms.

a reply to: undo

Well now we're getting into the nitty-gritty of "who came first" and "who made whom", as to whether the Anunnaki myths are legit as per Zechariah Sitchin and the origins of the Babylonian race and so forth. I don't mind that the thread has gone off on a tangent, but this is prime PM material.

originally posted by: undo
a reply to: Demonarch

well check your pms.

Well if you've sent me anything, it's not showing up in my inbox. I might have to ask a mod to help me out.

a reply to: Demonarch

to your pimps and hos comment, i simply stated:

"well i often rely on my husband to protect me and as far as i know, i'm not a whore."


perhaps relating protection to whoredom is exaggerated?

to your "re:" i said

theres more to the story, alot more. for example, have you done any research on the hyksos? i have a theory that jesus was the son of cleopatra and alot of his more esoteric comments, are related to ancient egyptian religion. the virgin (artificial insemination) birth concept is quite old, which is why there were so many royals claiming they or their offspring were "divine" men/women. every pharaoh was a god man, for example. oh there's so much detail people are missing out on cause they stop once they hit the first WTF moment.

cognitive dissonance is one thing i'm always checking for in scriptures and other ancient texts. when there is literally no explanation other than tampering, cultural drift or mistranslation, i chalk it up to that very thing.

a reply to: undo

Fair enough, thx for the replies. I'm going to whine to a mod that I messed something up and am not receiving PMs from other members.

If we're on the whole tangent, I may as well add that I happen to be highly interested in Sitchin's Anunnaki theory, but am skeptical as to whether the Babylonians were the very first among the human race (or if, which appears more realistic to me, they were merely the first humans that the Anunnaki genetically tampered with). The Joy of Satan people seem to believe that the Babylonians were the first humans alive (and they equate Satan to Enki, which is debatable), but their ideological obsession with the Anunnaki theory makes them extremely questionable as to their anthropological theories (such as stating that the Babylonians were an "Aryan race", and people say I'm delusional as to the whole Aryan business...).

a reply to: Demonarch

well theoretically, all races are copies of other anunnaki. so the torah is just relating the history of one family tree of one anunnaki. also the first adam were males and females, not hermaphrodites, but literally male elohim clones and female elohim clones but they were all cloned by one creator god (who, evidentally, was not the guy who condemned them later) from other elohim.

originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: Demonarch

there is nothing wrong with having pride in your race, there is something wrong with calling our women "ho's" and you didn't read what i said with undo evidently, good try.

A racist and a bigot. Now wonder you bash Islam all day.

originally posted by: Demonarch
a reply to: enlightenedservant
OK, so you take the story of Adam and Eve literally and believe that the Biblical god and Quranic god are one and the same. Not dissing, I just understand what you base your spiritual decision on.

For Adam & Eve, that depends if you mean the Biblical version or the Quranic version. There are differences. But yeah, I believe the Quranic version which I feel goes along with the creation of either Homo Sapiens or Hominids. In other words, I don't believe a chimpanzee gave birth to the 1st Homo Sapiens.

As for the Biblical & Quranic Gods being the same? Maybe. Most Muslims will tell you a resounding yes. But after actually reading the Old Testament, there are passages about the God of the Israelites that don't match the God of Islam. Psalms 18 is an example.

6 In my distress I called to the Lord; I cried to my God for help. From his temple he heard my voice; my cry came before him, into his ears.

7 The earth trembled and quaked, and the foundations of the mountains shook; they trembled because he was angry.

8 Smoke rose from his nostrils; consuming fire came from his mouth, burning coals blazed out of it.

9 He parted the heavens and came down; dark clouds were under his feet.

10 He mounted the cherubim and flew; he soared on the wings of the wind.

This describes a humanoid "God" riding an angel to attack his enemies, with smoke coming out of his mouth.

13 The Lord thundered from heaven; the voice of the Most High resounded.
14 He shot his arrows and scattered the enemy, with great bolts of lightning he routed them.

And this part describes this humanoid "God" shooting arrows of lightning to destroy its foes. Neither of these descriptions matches the Qur'an's description of God, who hasn't created anything in His image and only needs to say "Be!" for something to happen. Our God certainly wouldn't need to ride an Angel & physically fight some human "enemies". (As an example, the Qur'an tells of an incident where some of the Israelite leaders went with Musa/Moses when he went to talk to God. Those Israelites demanded God reveal Himself for them to believe He existed, so God struck them down instantly. Musa/Moses had to beg God to revive them & give them another chance, which He did.)

Another example would be the Old Testament passage where the Prophet Yaqub/Jacob supposedly wrestles "God" over night and eventually defeats "God", thus gaining the new name "Israel" (which means "he who wrestles with God", "he who struggles with God", etc). Any Muslim reading that passage would instantly consider it false & blasphemous. Even some Christian translations have made it seem that Yaqub/Jacob wrestled an Angel instead of God (I forgot which passage it is so whatever).

I don't want to go into the history of each book & why I reject them but needless to say, I believe many scriptures have been tainted, made up to serve specific purposes, and plagiarized from non-Judeo-Christian sources. Besides, many people don't seem to understand that the TaNaKh that the Old Testament is based on is a collection of stories from the Tribe of Judah's perspective. The 10 Northern Tribes of Israel have very different versions of the stories, as the Samaritan Pentateuch shows. Plus there are other ancient "Torah-following" sects around the world who have different versions of the stories, too.

originally posted by: Demonarch
Sorta-viral post on Facebook supposedly from a disabled army veteran, claiming that a tent city near his city is currently amassing tens of thousands of Muslims. They're arriving by the busload and police are protecting them.

Here's the link to the public FB post, can any of you fine Texas folks debunk this if there is anything to debunk? Thank y'all kindly.

www.facebook.com...

After the two would be cartoon shooters took bullets to the head. Gather all you want. I would think twice before starting anything in Texas. Might have better luck in California.

a reply to: sickofthelies

I live in College Station. Haven't seen anything abnormal here, but as you say, it does bear watching as anything out of the normal does. I just wonder what's going on with the 5 or 6 Black Apache Gunship helicopters that fly routes extremely low around this area everyday. Even got some pictures of them the other day. I was close up and there were no markings at all on them. They were taxiing in formation and departed in formation from KCLL the day I took pictures. Sort of out of the ordinary.

a reply to: mdl59

There's an entire combat aviation brigade less than two hours' drive from college station. There's a huge ROTC program at college station. I would be surprised to NOT see helos in the area from time to time.