It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Do you have any data that prove that what is been happening with the propaganda of man made clima change is real and not something made for the sole reason of creating a problem that actually is been there but now has become very profitable.?
One of the names they invoke most often is Wei-Hock Soon, known as Willie, a scientist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics who claims that variations in the sun’s energy can largely explain recent global warming. He has often appeared on conservative news programs, testified before Congress and in state capitals, and starred at conferences of people who deny the risks of global warming.
But newly released documents show the extent to which Dr. Soon’s work has been tied to funding he received from corporate interests.
He has accepted more than $1.2 million in money from the fossil-fuel industry over the last decade while failing to disclose that conflict of interest in most of his scientific papers. At least 11 papers he has published since 2008 omitted such a disclosure, and in at least eight of those cases, he appears to have violated ethical guidelines of the journals that published his work.
Document: Funding That Climate Researcher Failed to Disclose
The documents show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as “deliverables” that he completed in exchange for their money. He used the same term to describe testimony he prepared for Congress.
Scientists and economists have been offered $10,000 each by a lobby group funded by one of the world's largest oil companies to undermine a major climate change report due to be published today.
Letters sent by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), an ExxonMobil-funded thinktank with close links to the Bush administration, offered the payments for articles that emphasise the shortcomings of a report from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is a huge and yet very small organization. Thousands of scientists from all over the world contribute to the work of the IPCC on a voluntary basis as authors, contributors and reviewers. None of them is paid by the IPCC. The work of the IPCC is guided by a set of principles and procedures.
Earth has always been changing, but now those changes that are actually part of nature has become an agenda.A priority, a political main topic, an economical opportunity, all that is a fact
Cima change is a trillion dollar agenda.
originally posted by: olaru12
Just a little word of warning to all the denyers.....
Don't come up here in the High Desert Rockies looking for sympathy or a handout when your home is flooded. Call your insurance man!!
like in South Carolina.
www.cnn.com...
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: Krazysh0t
What specifically is causing people to assume such?
What history shows us that this is possible?
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Do you have any data that prove that what is been happening with the propaganda of man made clima change is real and not something made for the sole reason of creating a problem that actually is been there but now has become very profitable.?
Earth has always been changing, but now those changes that are actually part of nature has become an agenda.A priority, a political main topic, an economical opportunity, all that is a fact
Cima change is a trillion dollar agenda.
originally posted by: olaru12
Just a little word of warning to all the denyers.....
Don't come up here in the High Desert Rockies looking for sympathy or a handout when your home is flooded. Call your insurance man!!
like in South Carolina.
www.cnn.com...
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: Krazysh0t
What specifically is causing people to assume such?
What history shows us that this is possible?
For the THIRD time in the thread now, here is the report
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: marg6043
Nature have always been there, has always been changing and the only reason we are feeling this changes now is because we are in natures way.
Just a heads up. This is a provable statement. Do you have any evidence that all these drastic changes we are seeing are SOLELY the fault of nature? Or, as I suspect, you are just letting your preconceived opinions dictate your facts without thoroughly vetting all the evidence? Because the evidence that scientists have been collecting says you are wrong. Completely wrong.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TrueBrit
Well then, what do you think will cost less: building adequate levees and dikes for 414 cities to maintain their populations and then even more on the subsequent cities that fall underwater as nothing is done or spending it on reducing carbon emissions so that we can save as many cities as we can?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: network dude
Stop confusing the narrative. Man made climate change and natural climate change work in tandem to do their destruction. Though man made climate change has effected the climate MUCH differently than the Earth's natural processes should be effecting it. Hence it is real.
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: DBCowboy
You can believe what ever you want. Just man up and take some personal responsibility for your thoughts and actions. How is that political?
However, don't let your ideology get in the way of your common sense!