It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Wright and his co-authors say the unusual star’s light pattern is consistent with a “swarm of megastructures,” perhaps stellar-light collectors, technology designed to catch energy from the star.
And yet, the explanation has to be rare or coincidental. After all, this light pattern doesn’t show up anywhere else, across 150,000 stars. We know that something strange is going on out there.
Assuming all goes well, the first observation would take place in January, with the follow-up coming next fall. If things go really well, the follow-up could happen sooner. “If we saw something exciting, we could ask the director for special allotted time on the VLA,” Wright told me. “And in that case, we’d be asking to go on right away.”
By considering the observational constraints on dust clumps orbiting a normal main-sequence star, we conclude that the scenario most consistent with the data is the passage of a family of exocomet fragments, all of which are associated with a single previous breakup event.
And yet, the explanation has to be rare or coincidental. After all, this light pattern doesn’t show up anywhere else, across 150,000 stars. We know that something strange is going on out there.
originally posted by: amazing
Must be really weird to discount multiple moons?
because comets are known in the
Solar System to have highly eccentric orbits and disrupt for various
reasons near pericenter, and infalling comets are a likely explanation
for the falling evaporating body (FEB) phenomenon seen
around many nearby A-type stars
originally posted by: slip2break
But how dense does a comet cloud have to be to occult 80% of a stars light from outside observation?
originally posted by: Hyperia
a reply to: schuyler
So he implies the anomaly could be an advanced type 2 alien structure?