911myths.com : WHY FAKING >73° BANK-ANGLES for a NoC FLYING PLANE.?

His post started at 6:00AM and ended at 7:06 AM.

I don't have that much to say about any topic.
Nor do I have the desire to read an opening post that long.

So could you boil it down to a sentence or two so I can get a feel about where you are coming from?

Are we still flogging this long-dead horse?
And even after the whole CIT thing seems to have faded from memory as well.

My main question would have to be what happened to those smashed light poles if the plane didn't pass through that way (on the south side)?

Wow Kudos for the time and effort
I tried to read it all but got brain cramp real bad.
A simple summary and an opinion would be great.
I have had about 2000 hrs on a flight sim so I understand where you are coming from.
Fantastic piloting skills by someone who didnt have a PPL.
BTW were any engine components, debri etc ever recovered and analyzed?

originally posted by: Ngatikiwi
BTW were any engine components, debri etc ever recovered and analyzed?

Yes, as well as DNA from the passengers and crew from Flight 77, as well as luggage from Flight 77....

a reply to: Ngatikiwi

Fantastic piloting skills by someone who didnt have a PPL.

No he lost his PPL when he gained his COMMERCIAL pilots license.
Here is a copy.

Why does this stupid BS still come up?
It's too easy to find the truth just by using GOOGLE.

a reply to: samkent

Yea my bad
havnt looked into this for years was relying on memory and did a search a few min ago to refresh and found it

a reply to: Ngatikiwi

Fantastic piloting skills by someone who didnt have a PPL.

Took course in 737 simulator (which is very similar to 757) at Jet Tech in Mesa Az in January 2001

Instructor signed off as completing "Tight Turns" section . Nothing was noted for "taxiing" or "landing"

a reply to: Pilgrum

My main question would have to be what happened to those smashed light poles if the plane didn't pass through that way (on the south side)?

If American 77 had passed north of the gas station, there would not have been downed light poles.

It is amazing that just yesterday, Saturday, October 10, during my chapter's participation in an event at Travis AFB, I was discussing a tactical maneuver with a KC-10 crewmember. The tactical maneuver is performed by our C-5, KC-10, and C-17 aircraft and similar to the maneuver performed by American 77. However, the aircraft perform a 360 degree-to-a-landing maneuver from altitudes as high as 10,000 feet.

A straight line drawn from the downed light poles to the exit hole on the C-ring wall will debunk the claim that American 77 passed north of the gas station. My Wing Commander, who was in the Pentagon when American 77 struck, has debunked truther claims as well.

a reply to: Ngatikiwi

Fantastic piloting skills by someone who didnt have a PPL.

He possessed a commercial pilot license, which requires a higher skill level than required for a private pilot license.

BTW were any engine components, debri etc ever recovered and analyzed?

Yes!

Photo 1: America 77 Wreckage

Photo 2: American 77 Wreckage

Photo 3: American 77 Wreckage

kudos to you LaBTop for your continued diligence vis a vis questioning the OS bravo

originally posted by: Pilgrum what happened to those smashed light poles if the plane didn't pass through that way (on the south side)?

somebody knocked them over?

a reply to: RoScoLaz4

somebody knocked them over?

Okay - who knocked the light poles down....? In broad daylight.... On a major highway filled with traffic.......

Maybe they were invisible ??????

a reply to: RoScoLaz4

somebody knocked them over?

American 77 knocked down the light poles.

a reply to: LaBTop

From your link.

4. I definitely found multiple MANUAL pressure resets ( or inserted by some REMOTELY CONTROLLED device) in that Flight 77 recovered FDR, which normally only will be done when a plane goes up, or back down through the 18,000 feet ceiling.

Using the following data chart, please show where at any time, American 77 was flown under remote control.

American 77 Altitude Profile Chart

Now, the flight path chart.

American 77 Fllight Path Chart

Secondly, you might want to call the Boeing Aircraft Co. and American Airlines so they can explain why the airframe of American 77 was not modified to fly under remote control.

a reply to: LaBTop

Thus, YOU, the reader, decide for yourself what is easier :

Well, let's look at the physical evidence for the southern approach.

Southern Approach Physical Evidence 1

Southern Approach Physical Evidence 2

Southern Approach Physical Evidence 3

Southern Approach Physical Evidence 4

Southern Approach Physical Evidence 5: Damaged Generator

To sum it up, an approach north of the gas station could not have created that path of destruction leading to the Pentagon nor was a B-757 capable of performing that tight radius just prior to impact with the Pentagon in regard to a northern approach.

a reply to: LaBTop

In regard to your second video, Rob Balsamo is interviewed. Rob and I, went head-to-head in another forum when I caught him deliberately distorting facts and evidence and spewing disinformation on a grand scale. In other words, Rob is not credible by any means.

The airline captain in that same video is incorrect as well. He mentioned that the wings of an airliner will have come off long before reaching 500 knots. Perhaps, I should contact him and let him know that the DC-8 exceeded the speed of sound and remained intact. I should also mention a B-747SP, a B-727, and an Air Force C-141 that also exceeded the speed of sound and landed safely.

Subsonic Airliners That Went Supersonic

It is apparent that the airline captain in your second video hasn't a clue as to what he is talking about and you can take Rob Balsamo out of the loop as well because Rob is well-known for spewing disinformation.

a reply to: skyeagle409

No one in here is interested in the OS of 911 and please don't destroy this thread with all your OS spamming.

This thread is not about everything concerning 911. Stick to the given topic.

a reply to: Informer1958

Just debunking false claims that I know to be false.

a reply to: skyeagle409

We all know the OS is false. However this thread is about:

911myths.com : WHY FAKING >73° BANK-ANGLES for a NoC FLYING PLANE.?

No one cares about Rob Balsamo and how bad you are.

a reply to: Informer1958

We all know the OS is false...

You only think that "OS" is false. After all, it has been 14 years and still no evidence that any major news agency will take seriously.

However this thread is about:

911myths.com : WHY FAKING >73° BANK-ANGLES for a NoC FLYING PLANE.?

No one cares about Rob Balsamo...

You should have noticed that Rob Balsamo was presented in a video.