It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: grey580
Why wouldn't Japan remain a close ally?
originally posted by: junglimogli
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: grey580
Why wouldn't Japan remain a close ally?
They haven't forgiven the US for dropping the bombs in 45 .. a severely cowardly and dishonorable act in Japanese eyes..
Many in the ranks still await the day to avenge .. and believe me ..they will ..
Make sure to sleep with one eye open ..
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: yuppa
They do? That's news to the Air Force. They're practically begging for a new improved missile to replace it.
originally posted by: Sammamishman
a reply to: yuppa
I think there might be some confusion in wording of the source material. They are referring to the -120 receiving IRST data from the launch platform during flight via a data link, not as an option built into the missile itself.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: yuppa
The launch aircraft has an IRST option, not the missile. I haven't seen a missile yet that has both. You can't put radar and an IR seeker both, because they'd interfere with each other. The IR seeker would have to go on the nose, which would put it in front of the radar, creating a shadow.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: FormOfTheLord
The Chinese hypersonic missiles are not going to take out the Japanese air force unless it gets lucky and launches an overwhelming strike and catches all of them on the ground.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: yuppa
The launch aircraft has an IRST option, not the missile. I haven't seen a missile yet that has both. You can't put radar and an IR seeker both, because they'd interfere with each other. The IR seeker would have to go on the nose, which would put it in front of the radar, creating a shadow.