It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: dothedew
The campus wasn't a gun free zone.
thinkprogress.org...
If you had your ducks in a row you could carry.
The system still has authority to control its property and facilities and can make and enforce internal policies that ban guns from university classrooms, dormitories and sports stadiums, said Chancellor George Pernsteiner on Tuesday. Some universities, for example, already prohibit firearms in sports arenas as a condition of purchasing a ticket to a sporting event.
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: Willtell
Just out of curiosity, what is Congress supposed to do?
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
One problem that stands out right away is that Obama isn't right.
Chicago is the perfect example of that. You cant legislate guns away from criminals. Mayor Jane Byrne passed legislation in 1982 banning hand guns in the city of Chicago. Since the outset of the Chicago handgun ban, the percentage of Chicago murders committed with handguns has averaged about 40% higher than it was before the law took effect. The US supreme court has since declared that law unconstitutional, as it should be.
Guns are not the problem. People with no respect for life are the problem. An entire generation of people who since the day they stopped sucking their mothers teat were given everything they asked for except discipline are the problem.
I agree, we need an answer. But we need a real answer, not more feel-good politics. We need a solution to this problem. Not another useless piece of legislation that serves no purpose other than to give a bunch of overpaid politicians a reason to pat themselves on the back, give themselves a raise, take an extra month off, and have their driver take them home, armed guards in tow, so they can relax after a hard days work doing nothing.
We deserve better than that.
The Congress is supposed to do something if the country is plagued by such an epidemic.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Vroomfondel
Was it 40% every year or what is the range of that 40%?
How do we make the connection that what people are saying that they youth had everything handed to them means they have no respect for life btw?
I keep hearing people talk about that, the same people that say that are usually the same ones that talk about how violence has been steadily going down for a while now as well.
So which is it, is the generation raising violent people or not?
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
No congress should be forced to resign if they do nothing!