It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So, you just made this up then. Nothing to support it.
The folks getting old today were not victims of the childhood obesity epidemic.
The official USDA food pyramid kills most people about retirement time.
Am I the topic now?
Mr Phage, are there any conspiracies that you have deemed to be possible?
Huh. According to the motto, it's about something else.
This is a conspiracy site after all.
If you were denying ignorance you would look up the obesity epidemic yourself, instead of playing contrarian.
The official USDA food pyramid kills most people about retirement time.
If the conspiracy is to shorten lifespans, it doesn't seem to be working. Does it?
The conspiracy attitude is certainly implied, if not stated overtly.
originally posted by: UnifiedSerenity
originally posted by: Starling
I'm very disappointed in the fact that almost all of you on ATS have lost the plot as to what the OP is about.
"California's Drought is a Government Conspiracy".
And this is ATS...Deny Ignorance?
I agree with what you said, but sadly, there are many on ATS who gain much more enjoyment by sounding intellectual rather than actually engaging in a thoughtful dialogue. I saw a video a few months back that showed some very strange "sheering" of weather fronts that should have brought in rain off the Pacific ocean that just disappeared before hitting the coast, and it did look at if some force (weather modification) were used to dry up the front.
Those who ask about "why would they dry up California"? Well, one could believe that since California is part of the "bread basket" that if you do destroy the crops, then panic might be created, prices would sky rocket and people would have to choose between bullets and bread.
I know for a fact that geo-engineering has been patented, and the levels of heavy metals being sprayed on us have destroyed so much land and trees that it will take ages to rehabilitate the areas affected. The autoimmune epidemic is rising, and a weak nation is a compliant nation. So, there are lots of reasons to distrust the government on this topic.
Here's proof of the spraying going on:
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Semicollegiate
If you were denying ignorance you would look up the obesity epidemic yourself, instead of playing contrarian.
I know that there are a lot of fat people. How does that square with this claim?
The official USDA food pyramid kills most people about retirement time.
If the conspiracy is to shorten lifespans, it doesn't seem to be working. Does it?
The conspiracy attitude is certainly implied, if not stated overtly.
If the conspiracy is to control the weather, how does that work? Apart from Wigington's arm waving, that is.
originally posted by: UnifiedSerenity
Great video that supports the artificial drought in California:
It feels like a conspiracy, even though it could be nothing but bureaucratic inertia.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Semicollegiate
It feels like a conspiracy, even though it could be nothing but bureaucratic inertia.
It feels like too much water being used by too much agriculture and too many people living in a place which has recently undergone a severe drought.
Not the first time nature has said, "enough."
www.history.com...
I thought that in a socialistic paradise there is no need to work (from each...to each...). Oh, you left out this part of the article:
Retirement age is older too. The idea being no retirement should be sought in the socialistic paradise.
This is probably because more workers in their 50s are on the job out of need and still have considerable family and other outside obligations. For the most part, workers 70-plus have all the flexibility they need—it’s called the ability to quit if they’re not happy.
No. It assumes some basic principles of health. But you still have not provided anything to support your claim about "most people dying about retirement time."
The food pyramid assumes that every one is exactly alike, one size fits all.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Semicollegiate
Re: your edit
I thought that in a socialistic paradise there is no need to work (from each...to each...). Oh, you left out this part of the article:
Retirement age is older too. The idea being no retirement should be sought in the socialistic paradise.
This is probably because more workers in their 50s are on the job out of need and still have considerable family and other outside obligations. For the most part, workers 70-plus have all the flexibility they need—it’s called the ability to quit if they’re not happy.
business.time.com...
More Elderly Find They Can't Afford Not to Work
By
Kelly Greene And
Anne Tergesen
January 21, 2012
Rose Marie Meece planned to retire from her job as a tour leader in Honolulu three years ago. The 78-year-old woman decided to stay after losing about half of the $300,000 in her retirement account during the downturn.
www.wsj.com...
No. It assumes some basic principles of health. But you still have not provided anything to support your claim about "most people dying about retirement time."
Do you think that the average person needs to eat 6 to 11 servings of carbohydrates per day?
Great video that supports the artificial drought in California: