It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tony9802
a reply to: gentledissident
In what countries of the Middle East is this common practice? Are there any maps and studies showing where this most proliferates? Is this a "cultural" problem due to the Islamic faith, or does it have to do with individual nation state culture, custom and practice?
Is the problem their faith or is their culture? Are these "cultures" living under thecratic Sharia law? What would be the Imam's opinion about all of this? How does the Imam believe Allah responds to the prevalence of such practices?
originally posted by: Antidisestablishment
This reminds me of an excellent movie called "The Kite Runner", which I'm sure you can find online. It's worth a watch. In it, a young boy is kidnapped and sexually abused by a Taliban member. It's pretty harrowing. I don't understand the link between Islam and paedophilia.
“It is reported from Aisha that she said: The Prophet entered into marriage with me when I was a girl of six … and at the time [of joining his household] I was a girl of nine years of age.”
“Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed [alone] for two years or so. He married Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old.”
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Your conscience isn't an excuse to ignore a lawful order. "Sit there and don't interfere" could easily be argued as being lawful, because the order is given in regard to "maintaining good order and discipline." "Sit there and don't interfere" doesn't impinge on your constitutional rights in any way.
Nobody at DoD has decreed orders to not interfere to be illegal, so it would seem that they don't think it's a violation of the UCMJ or Geneva Conventions. Is it? I'm not going to argue the case either way. But I see it for what it is.
All the lofty talk is well and good but since you're not there, it's rather moot. Talk is cheap.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Your conscience isn't an excuse to ignore a lawful order. "Sit there and don't interfere" could easily be argued as being lawful, because the order is given in regard to "maintaining good order and discipline." "Sit there and don't interfere" doesn't impinge on your constitutional rights in any way.
Nobody at DoD has decreed orders to not interfere to be illegal, so it would seem that they don't think it's a violation of the UCMJ or Geneva Conventions. Is it? I'm not going to argue the case either way. But I see it for what it is.
All the lofty talk is well and good but since you're not there, it's rather moot. Talk is cheap.
im with you on this one.
easy to say they would face the punishment but they of course are not there.
i bet they'd all bust their CO right in the mouf too.
eh
didnt know it was the US armed forces job to police the entire region for crimes(that are apparently not even crimes).
yeah it sucks and yeah it is terrible.
fact is our people are not there to stop rape from happening
too bad all these tough guys are not over there actually doing anything
i know if i was there i would be piss scared and my cries would probably be louder than dem boys
originally posted by: amicktd
a reply to: Shamrock6
Diddling other boys, growing or muling poppy to get money and get status so they can diddle other boys, doing something else to get status so they can diddle other boys, or using their government position to diddle other boys.
I certainly hope not.
Then you're ignoring the reality that is Afghanistan.
f you grew up in a country where this was the norm and you were told all your life that it was normal and you knew no different than it, I doubt it.
Unsure what you meant by that.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: CTRTCTRT
is the base in the middle east region?
how are civilians even on a US military base with little boys in the first place
originally posted by: deadeyedick
This is the sort of thing one could need help with later on. Even if it bothered a soldier enough to quit or walk away they can not. I am positive no one signed up to go to the desert and listen to kids being raped. Yet just another stress to add to the list of why we should do more for our vets.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: CTRTCTRT
Sorry...but that is a load of crap! Their commander ordered the soldiers after being ordered by OUR GOVERNMENT! It is the pledge and law that our military follow these orders or risk as much as death. Don't blame the symptom...blame the problem. Our government...Obama at the current moment knows about this, and the military leaders were instructed to allow it.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: CTRTCTRT
it would benefit nobody to sit in jail
I would keep my mouth shut and rely on chance
I would also be willing to bet that many done just that or at the least were busy when the scum needed protection
just another casualty of war
conscious clear