2016 Goes to the Dogs! JV on the New Collared Candidate & What It Takes to Run This Country

Well, it’s official: the 2016 race for the presidential nomination has become a dog and pony show as a canine from Kentucky enters the race. The Border Collie may not be beating Trump in the polls, but at least she’s housebroken. In this edition of "# Politicians Say", I go off on joke candidates and the experience it takes to become president.

I wish there were a way I could download it and watch it, my internet connection isn't that great. If possible please let me know how.

I did get to the part about Taft, Hoover, and Eisenhower on the people who were president but never held an elective office. Very interesting on that too, since many people believe that a person needs long term elected experience to be qualified for higher positions in elected offices.

From living here I've observed that as long as your political gang/party wins office it doesn't matter if you lose general elections, you'll still get an appointed government job.

If freedom is to exist, government cannot.

If there is any form of government, freedoms will be taken away.

PERIOD.

If you lose though, you can't give out those jobs. You have to be on the winning side.

originally posted by: Philippines
I wish there were a way I could download it and watch it, my internet connection isn't that great. If possible please let me know how.

I did get to the part about Taft, Hoover, and Eisenhower on the people who were president but never held an elective office. Very interesting on that too, since many people believe that a person needs long term elected experience to be qualified for higher positions in elected offices.

From living here I've observed that as long as your political gang/party wins office it doesn't matter if you lose general elections, you'll still get an appointed government job.

In an organized society you have to lose a few freedoms because you have to be able to respect other people in that society. Does government restrict freedom? Certainly it does. It restricts you from the freedom of abusing someone else, but I don't think it necessarily restricts you of freedom if you don't abuse someone to begin with. You have to have government, or you're going to have anarchy.

originally posted by: higherconscience
If freedom is to exist, government cannot.

If there is any form of government, freedoms will be taken away.

PERIOD.

a reply to: JesseVentura

Agree with highconciensce but you mean something like meritocracy?
Just live by the 10commands and let Karma do it's jobs things will also be fine I think. All get along and help someone if needed. Then there's the moneyproblem, control, power... big big sins.... wich destroys us. Can't buy love, and money? we once did proof we can live without.

a reply to: JesseVentura

maybe