It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
None of them. They'll all tow the line just like every president that came before them, Bernie Sanders seems to be the best hope we have, but I've been burned too many times to fully support any of them.
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
I lean pretty far left, but am not inspired by the Democratic candidates for President, I watched the Republican debate tonight. My question is who would independents be inspired to support, or other Democrats?
From watching the first two debates, John Kassich is a pretty strong candidate.
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: BubbaJoe
I think a GOP or DNC endorsed candidate are one in the same and both create friendly Oligopoly laws.
With that said
1. I liked Ben Carson.
2. The GOP won't pick him and are already trying to downgrade his performance. This means that I like him even more.
I also liked his respone on vacine. Get rid of the nice.to have vacines and keep only the ones we really need to decrease the amounts and spread them out more. Thats what we did with my son.
Ben Carson spoke logically and did not come across as regurgitating scripted responses and emotions.
He is also for a Flat tax, was against the war, has a non gov't politician background, and appears to determine his stance on issues on logic rather than political rhetoric .
originally posted by: Boscowashisnamo
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
I lean pretty far left, but am not inspired by the Democratic candidates for President, I watched the Republican debate tonight. My question is who would independents be inspired to support, or other Democrats?
From watching the first two debates, John Kassich is a pretty strong candidate.
I consider myself an Independent, voting from candidates from several parties on any given ballot. After discarding obvious no-gos, I vet the remainder and vote for the candidate who best represents their constituents based on history, bio and platform. The roster from both sides leaves me with no clear choice, with the exception of Dems. HRC is done, IMO, Biden is hesitant, Sanders(He has some great qualities and good ideas, but am not sold on him) may be popular, but can't see him carrying the ticket as a self-avowed Socialist. He may go the distance if he picks a running mate that'll solidify the ticket(Warren? Doubtful, but it'd be a dream team for many).
On the flip side, Trump is an entertainer whose shtick will wear thin, Bush does nothing for many people, Christie has too much baggage/temper, and the candidates who hold hard lines against women's choices about their own bodies are a non-starter for many. The field on this side is muddled, and the media only focuses on Trump. Fiorina is the one candidate from this side that appeals to me, and if it's time for a woman in the WH, she's the only woman in the field that I would vote for. It's early in the race, and so much can happen in the upcoming months. I'm in agreement with your opinion of Kassich, but he's not getting the exposure the popular candidates are receiving.
originally posted by: Metallicus
Most of the people on this site are partisan slaves and would never even consider breaking lock step with their chosen party BS. I bet you will see lots of people respond with none.
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
originally posted by: Metallicus
Most of the people on this site are partisan slaves and would never even consider breaking lock step with their chosen party BS. I bet you will see lots of people respond with none.
I think you are underestimating the majority of the users on this site, there may be far more independent thinkers than you imply.