Google Finally Reveals Heavily Controversial Planet X to the Public At Large

originally posted by: Ploutonas
a reply to: ngchunter
I said it in a prev comment, the Planet X theory contains contradictory data... I dont believe in Nibiru either.

It seems those who create such stories, they fear any kind of return of the Gods, so they created an urban legend about an alien hostile to humans planet with giant reptiles, that will eat us all.

They hate Apollo, they hate anything that has to do with us and they live in fear and lately maybe in panic as well...

I said it after all, we do expect our people to return because they promised and they gave us indications about the time they will. "They know these indications too" , thats why they create fear to humanity for aliens or for anunaki or whatever.

thats my personal opinion.

Also I have to say that I am dyslexic and I edit my comments to fix the spelling thing. People have nothing to fear, for real alien invasions, anything that may happen it will be earthy thing (false flag), the evil resides on planet earth allready and when the times comes... this thing will be removed. Simple as that.

You need to educate your self in symbols before you comment into that. This symbol is used by us since always. (not since 2000 y ago). I also never interest about a X planet that makes 3600y travels. I gave my opinion about Nibiru and I also gave my opinion about winged planets - deal with it

Relinking your previously wrong post claiming winged planets does not make it true. It is not a winged planet, it's not even a planet at all. It is a distant T Tauri star and reflection nebula many light years away. What part of this do you not understand? Or do you want even more proof that it's really not a planet at all? I can measure the parallax directly and prove to you that it's light years away, not a planet in our solar system if you like. Symbols and your *ahem* interesting and disturbed interpretation of them (am I allowed to say that mods? Give me a break, this guy's on this thread promoting his personal interpretation of symbology on a thread all about hard science and I'm not allowed to give my opinion of his interpretations?!) are irrelevant.

a reply to: ngchunter

Ok if thats what you believe, many claim its a planet heading to us and my answer goes to both. But I also referred to planets who travel instead orbiting a star... That why I also stated to my comment in both types (winged and rogue)

My opinion doesnt change you know, if this winged planet is a star with reflections of nebula... And thats why I decline any Nibiru as an intelligent alien planet that orbits. If its an intelligent alien planet, they would get out of here long ago. Not to wait with such an envy and heinous for once per 3600 y to destroy another planet. Thats not the definition of gods you know, you took it wrong from jews.. And if our planet was in danger for once per 3600y, our world would be much better today, we would rebuilt and progress with original values. Thats why I also said, the bad is allready residing on earth, you dont have to wait for it to fall from the skies.

GODS = Those who run fast (and expand life in the cosmos).
GOD = The one who is everywhere without the need to run fast and thats the entire cosmos itself.

originally posted by: Ploutonas
a reply to: ngchunter

Ok if thats what you believe,

It's not about what I believe, it's about the facts.

many claim its a planet heading to us and my answer goes to both.

Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy. It doesn't matter how many people claim it's a planet, they're wrong. They're all wrong. It is a distant star and reflection nebula. If it were a planet it would move over time due to its orbital motion and due to parallax from earth's orbit around the sun. It does not.
h.dropcanvas.com...

But I also referred to planets who travel instead orbiting a star...

Which would not be in orbit and would not have been seen in history and would not have symbols written about it and would not be stationary across decades of time like GN 05.39.2.

a reply to: ngchunter

But I also referred to planets who travel instead orbiting a star... Which would not be in orbit and would not have been seen in history and would not have symbols written about it and would not be stationary across decades of time like GN 05.39.2.

I gave reference how the Gods travel, believe or not, take it or leave it, is the less of my concerns.

originally posted by: Ploutonas
a reply to: ngchunter

But I also referred to planets who travel instead orbiting a star... Which would not be in orbit and would not have been seen in history and would not have symbols written about it and would not be stationary across decades of time like GN 05.39.2.

I gave reference how the Gods travel, believe or not, take it or leave it, is the less of my concerns.

I hear Xenu travels in a space version of a 747. Must be true.

a reply to: ngchunter

Facts is also that by NASA



And I challenge you, not to use our titles and names, use urs (YHVH or whatever BAAL, or MOON or LEVAN or Lilith or Saturn or anything, you have great imaginations I believe)... it will be destroyed before it takes off.

ps: You already had some "challengers" which all of them destroyed.

originally posted by: Ploutonas
a reply to: ngchunter

Facts is also that by NASA

And I challenge you, not to use our titles and names, use urs (YHVH or whatever BAAL, or MOON or LEVAN or Lilith or Saturn or anything, you have great imaginations I believe)... it will be destroyed before it takes off.

ps: You allready had some "chalengers" which all of them destroyed.

Seriously, what the heck are you talking about? What "challengers?" What do you mean "destroyed before it takes off?" Is that some kind of threat? What on earth are you even saying? [snipped]

a reply to: ngchunter

you started speaking about scientology XENU, you sound more dangerous that I do. I gave a reference from NASA. I believe you are the spooky one.

originally posted by: Ploutonas
a reply to: ngchunter

you started speaking about scientology XENU, you sound more dangerous that I do. I gave a reference from NASA. I believe you are the spooky one.

I'm dangerous because I used scientology as a reductio ad absurdum? That makes no sense. You posted a video of music from a greek composer, Vangelis. That's not a NASA reference.

a reply to: ngchunter
Nasa organized it, Nasa (americans) paid it and you also send it to space live... And yes, you could refer to batman in a spacecraft, or Luke or Darth Vader.. You decided to refer to a religion.

originally posted by: Ploutonas
a reply to: ngchunter
Nasa organized it, Nasa (americans) paid it and you also send it to space live...

Actually Sony organized it, Sony paid for it along with the Greek government.
www.telegraph.co.uk...
Anything else you want to lie about?

originally posted by: Ploutonas
a reply to: ngchunter
You decided to refer to a religion.

I was showing the ridiculousness of your statement and how I could just as easily claim something equally ridiculous and unsupported by any evidence which people actually believe as well. I didn't say I believed it. I guess you didn't understand that.

a reply to: ngchunter

I give you my word to that, our government didnt paid a single p... en.wikipedia.org...

we also have rumors for Mythodea II but is not going to be Nasa thing if Vagelis publish it. (and you have to be capable of reading the lyrics), Vangelis originally created it for us 7 movements, but Nasa requested some more movements (you praised father some things)

Anyway lets not speak about mythodeas, but my point stands for the planets as vehicles of the "Gods" , beyond your xenu god. There is nothing else I can help you with.

originally posted by: Ploutonas
a reply to: ngchunter

I give you my word to that, our government didnt paid a single p...

The Mythodea project has been expensive: $7 million for a single concert and recording, $3.5 million put up by the record company Sony Classical, the other $3.5 million by the Greek government.

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Like I said, it was paid for by Sony and the Greek government, not NASA. Your "word" is not worth anything.

originally posted by: ngchunter

originally posted by: Ploutonas
a reply to: ngchunter
You decided to refer to a religion.

I was showing the ridiculousness of your statement and how I could just as easily claim something equally ridiculous and unsupported by any evidence which people actually believe as well. I didn't say I believed it. I guess you didn't understand that.

I guess I need to repeat this. Xenu is not "my god." But it is just as ridiculous and unsupported by evidence as your statement.

originally posted by: ngchunter

originally posted by: Ploutonas
a reply to: ngchunter

I give you my word to that, our government didnt paid a single p...

The Mythodea project has been expensive: $7 million for a single concert and recording, $3.5 million put up by the record company Sony Classical, the other $3.5 million by the Greek government.

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Like I said, it was paid for by Sony and the Greek government, not NASA. Your "word" is not worth anything.

well who is the dangerous and spooky one when he speaks like that..! Our government didnt paid anything, its something we all know in my country and originally they didnt wanted to offer a place for the event. But it did happen twice one as a prive for 80-100 people and one for the public. My friend was in the crew, building things for it (sound, stage, all these things it needed). The wikipedia I gave is much more accurate than a reporter from telegraph. (I am not a 100% certain that the prive Mythodea happened, but I was that day with my friend and I also helped him to measure some areas for the machinery. I also met Vangellis, he is adorable. The place we did some stuff, was not in the temple of Olympian Zeus, but in another spot of Akropolis... far far away and I knew that it was for 80 people, not the people I saw in TV. Maybe they canceled the old place and picked another, I dont know what happened.

And in order to stop your obsessive thing about who paid it, Nasa asked it and nasa send to outer space.

Could the explanation of wings associated with heavenly observations be simply the rationalisation of ancient cultures in relation to objects that 'fly' through the air?

What else might they have observed that had the ability to fly and what did they all have in common?

....wings

a reply to: Pilgrum

could it be a planetary matter (dust, stones, ice, etc) while a rogue planet moves and travels alone... So this kind of materials leaves behind that kind of winged planet, like a tail. Because that is what comes into my mind when I see this kind of stuff. Thats why the ancients said, these kind of artificial things are designed or modified to live inside them, its hollow and modified to travel. Like the moon, ancient references.

If we considered artificial planets but not hollow, then they should be very advanced in their atmosphere and may be considered as mini solar systems, all solar systems travel after all, our solar system travels too, Andromeda comes uppon us, its the safest travel if we think about it.

a reply to: ngchunter

Yes i know.. Forgive me, New Years extended a day longer than usual.

originally posted by: Ploutonas

originally posted by: ngchunter

originally posted by: Ploutonas
a reply to: ngchunter

I give you my word to that, our government didnt paid a single p...

The Mythodea project has been expensive: $7 million for a single concert and recording, $3.5 million put up by the record company Sony Classical, the other $3.5 million by the Greek government.

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Like I said, it was paid for by Sony and the Greek government, not NASA. Your "word" is not worth anything.

well who is the dangerous and spooky one when he speaks like that..! Our government didnt paid anything, its something we all know in my country and originally they didnt wanted to offer a place for the event.

Wrong.

The Mythodea project has been expensive: $7 million for a single concert and recording, $3.5 million put up by the record company Sony Classical, the other $3.5 million by the Greek government.

www.telegraph.co.uk...

How many times do I have to post this? A major newspaper is far more credible than you.