It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
a reply to: xuenchen
This doesn't surprise me at all. Considering some of the comments from pro-abortion people in other forums, nothing they do would surprise me anymore.
One person claimed that an unborn baby is human, but "not a person".
Many claim the unborn are property.
One called babies "biological invaders", and claimed that, if they were to be considered people, then they (the babies) should be held responsible for invading the mother, their own implantation, and thus it is justifiable to kill them. If they are innocent, then they aren't considered to be "persons".
Another claimed that babies in the womb are illegally using the organs of the mothers to live.
So, cooking the books to hide their crimes isn't a shock at all. The term "ghouls" isn't strong enough.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: xuenchen
What kind of response is that?
Did you watch the 28 minute video?
Read my opening post very carefully.
Then respond to the article, not me personally.
I will comment later with my thoughts.
originally posted by: Metallicus
'All lives matter' until it is a defenseless baby. These PP people are sick.
originally posted by: snypwsd
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
a reply to: xuenchen
This doesn't surprise me at all. Considering some of the comments from pro-abortion people in other forums, nothing they do would surprise me anymore.
One person claimed that an unborn baby is human, but "not a person".
Many claim the unborn are property.
One called babies "biological invaders", and claimed that, if they were to be considered people, then they (the babies) should be held responsible for invading the mother, their own implantation, and thus it is justifiable to kill them. If they are innocent, then they aren't considered to be "persons".
Another claimed that babies in the womb are illegally using the organs of the mothers to live.
So, cooking the books to hide their crimes isn't a shock at all. The term "ghouls" isn't strong enough.
Did you even watch the vid.. let alone all the other ones? There is no cooking of the books. No one is selling anything. The funds that are exchanged are for shipping. This whole planned parenthood thing is getting out of hand because people don't sit down and watch the videos. If you did then you should be on the pro abortion side of the argument, for the fact that they say they don't sell them it's only the shipping costs that PP gets back.
The bible is ok with abortions.. lol
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
The funds are variable based on what is sold, and ye, they are selling. They claim it's "shipping costs", but that isn't true.
These rules can also make obtaining care dangerous for patients experiencing pregnancy complications. Dr. Ashlee Bergin, a practicing OB-GYN in Chicago, shared a story during an interview with RH Reality Check of seeing a patient within the last month who came to Bergin’s non-Catholic-affiliated hospital experiencing a spontaneous miscarriage at about 18 weeks. According to Bergin, the patient was bleeding quite significantly and yet had been turned away from two different Catholic hospitals, because there was still a fetal heartbeat. By the time the patient got to Bergin’s hospital, she was anemic and in an emergency situation.
“In a lot of these situations, it definitely impacts our ability to provide the complete spectrum of care, especially reproductive health care, to women,” Bergin told RH Reality Check. “Catholic doctrine interferes with our ability to provide medically timely care,” she continued. “Not only that, it’s the right thing to do for these women and we are being told we can’t do what’s right for these women because of these doctrines.”
rhrealitycheck.org...
originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: xuenchen
Ok, this is PP story obviously going to last forever. Might I suggest the topic be put in the 2016 Elections forum because isn't that REALLY what this is all about?
Goodness, if I were proChoice, I wouldn't be after all these headlines!
No offense intended to the OP, whatsoever. Your post was spot on for the subject matter.