It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How is their place of employment relevant to the story?
originally posted by: Misinformation
all pertinent aspect assemblages regarding the moon hoax must be disjunctured & discharged down the memory hole , then the procedure too discredit potential whistle blowers can commence through the controlled opposition ...
originally posted by: Reallyfolks
a reply to: Spider879
I believe this is more wide spread than is ever reported or would even be believable to the public. Especially by people in positions of prestige and power. Feel for the children being used.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
I think it's a false flag being used to Blackmail NASA employees into keeping quiet about everything they know concerning the space program and greys. "Keep quiet or we'll release your name as being guilty of child porn!"
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Spider879
I have just been onto the NASA website, because I wanted to make something very clear, something which your OP singularly fails to remind us of, despite the necessity of doing so in times such as these, and in light of the information you provide in your OP.
NASA has 17,229 total employees of its own, aside from any contractors they might have working on their projects, and bear in mind, it is contractors which make up the vast majority of the workforce on most projects
Of those 17,229 , 16,572 are full time employees, and the rest are split up between students, part timers, term employees, and other non-full time staff.
So the fact that 16 of them have been found to be involved in such a scandal means that 0.093% of the people at NASA have anything to do with this issue. Lets keep this in some sort of perspective shall we?
NASA as a whole, does not like images of little kids. Less than one percent of its full time workforce however, need a severe kicking.
originally posted by: Spider879
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Spider879
I have just been onto the NASA website, because I wanted to make something very clear, something which your OP singularly fails to remind us of, despite the necessity of doing so in times such as these, and in light of the information you provide in your OP.
NASA has 17,229 total employees of its own, aside from any contractors they might have working on their projects, and bear in mind, it is contractors which make up the vast majority of the workforce on most projects
Of those 17,229 , 16,572 are full time employees, and the rest are split up between students, part timers, term employees, and other non-full time staff.
So the fact that 16 of them have been found to be involved in such a scandal means that 0.093% of the people at NASA have anything to do with this issue. Lets keep this in some sort of perspective shall we?
NASA as a whole, does not like images of little kids. Less than one percent of its full time workforce however, need a severe kicking.
I understand Truebrit, but the article goes on to say some involved were of the highest clearance, I am thinking this ain't the catering staff or the gofer, but I am afraid like the Pentagon scandal sometimes back, we may just be scratching the surface someone also mentioned the Catholic church, well with the Church most of us came to expect scandals such as this so no surprise, but the church also involved themselves in cover-ups like NASA..the kind of scandal I was hoping for is that they had alien bodies on Ice or have some sorta secret space program not some low level scum bucket sht like this.