It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FinalCountdown
a reply to: olaru12
I think you mean without the old women's vote.
I know a lot women that would vote for Trump.
Most of these women don't wear pants suits and like men a little rough sometimes, even slightly abusive (verbally).
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Made to order for her to defeat so she looks good. She has exponentially more donation funds in her campaign war chest. That was before the Top Secret stuff was found on her server though. Now they will have to drag out some fossils like Biden in case she becomes irrelevant. Even Biden would whoop that mark for the nomination.
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Made to order for her to defeat so she looks good. She has exponentially more donation funds in her campaign war chest. That was before the Top Secret stuff was found on her server though. Now they will have to drag out some fossils like Biden in case she becomes irrelevant. Even Biden would whoop that mark for the nomination.
Sure. There's a tiny hole in your theory however. Which is the fact that Sanders is drawing record crowds of support, he's growing in popularity even in swing and conservative states, he's not only caught up in the polls but has passed Hillary in some of them, his support continues to grow every day and if Hillary is out of it, Biden wouldn't stand a chance. So other than those major opposing details your little theory is right on target.
originally posted by: intrepid
It's a sad state of affairs that a complete moron is even considered because the past is so damn bad. The next Reagan? He's not even the next Weird Al.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: mOjOm
Yes, how dare people get frustrated and angry when they feel they aren't being represented at all. Liberals wouldn't know a thing about that from the GW days would they?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: mOjOm
Yes, how dare people get frustrated and angry when they feel they aren't being represented at all. Liberals wouldn't know a thing about that from the GW days would they?
originally posted by: introvert
Trump is no Reagan and a Reagan is not what we need at all.
I understand that Reagan is a god of sorts in the conservative circles, but he was not all that good for the country. Plenty of tax hikes and who can forget the "October Surprise".
I want the world to actually be a little worried about what our president says. I want them to think, oh Donald's not going to like that, he may call in another drone strike…
It's all part of making America great again.
a reply to: intrepid
It's a sad state of affairs that a complete moron is even considered because the past is so damn bad. The next Reagan?
originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: FinalCountdown
I want the world to actually be a little worried about what our president says. I want them to think, oh Donald's not going to like that, he may call in another drone strike…
It's all part of making America great again.
Being a bully on the world stage only makes its victim lash out. It will cause conflict, isolate us and cause us to lose allies. The world is a volatile place, the last thing we need is someone who can't negotiate peace.