It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
What does the number of chromosomes have to do with evolution?
phenomena.nationalgeographic.com...
It is all over the place, kind of like how things would be if they were created instead of a steady loss of genetic material over long evolutionary periods.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
It is all over the place, kind of like how things would be if they were created instead of a steady loss of genetic material over long evolutionary periods.
You know that the article in the OP is not about chromosome counts, right?
Where, in evolutionary theory, is it put forth that there is a steady loss of genetic material over long periods?
Or is that just another creationist strawman?
No. Not "monkey to man". Once again, a creationist strawman.
It is the Monkey to man ratio.....48 to 46. It was a short jump in evolutionary time which shows a reduction in pairs.
Goldfish to toucan? Seriously? You are claiming that toucans evolved from goldfish?
Then you have goldfish to toucan increasing the chromosome count.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
No. Not "monkey to man". Once again, a creationist strawman.
It is the Monkey to man ratio.....48 to 46. It was a short jump in evolutionary time which shows a reduction in pairs.
Goldfish to toucan? Seriously? You are claiming that toucans evolved from goldfish?
Then you have goldfish to toucan increasing the chromosome count.
No. Are you claiming that toucans evolved from goldfish?
Are you claiming birds came before fish in evolution
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
No. Are you claiming that toucans evolved from goldfish?
Are you claiming birds came before fish in evolution
Are you claiming that humans evolved from monkeys?
Do all fish have the same number of chromosomes?
Still haven't gotten the concept of common ancestor, have you? It's sort of the basic idea. No wonder you're confused.
Oh excuse me, chimp not monkey, whatever same thing they came before man and monkey can generically cover them all as a term.
Why?
A mouse has 50 and there is a rat with a little over a hundred. That is odd.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Still haven't gotten the concept of common ancestor, have you? It's sort of the basic idea. No wonder you're confused.
Oh excuse me, chimp not monkey, whatever same thing they came before man and monkey can generically cover them all as a term.
Why?
A mouse has 50 and there is a rat with a little over a hundred. That is odd.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: RealTruthSeeker
According to the theory of evolution that the public school taught me, anything that stands in the way of reproduction is considered disease. So in light of evolution, what does that say about homosexuality?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
No. Are you claiming that toucans evolved from goldfish?
Are you claiming birds came before fish in evolution
Are you claiming that humans evolved from monkeys?
Do all fish have the same number of chromosomes?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
No. Are you claiming that toucans evolved from goldfish?
Are you claiming birds came before fish in evolution
Are you claiming that humans evolved from monkeys?
Do all fish have the same number of chromosomes?
well I hit the wrong post to respond to, it should have been your next one, anyway my fault.
So the common ancestor.
Chimp 48
man 46
negative 2
Goldfish 94
Toucan 106
positive 12
Then there this certain the ant with one male chromosome. Fully functional with only one......
Common ancestor may ass.
A universal common ancestor would possess all genetic possibility, yet reality is anything but.