theblaze.com: 'Hillary Clinton is done...chalk marks on the outline of her political career.'

originally posted by: UFGarvin

originally posted by: trifecta

originally posted by: Profusion

It’s all over for Hillary Clinton. It’s done. Finished. Finito. They are drawing chalk marks on the outline of her political career.

How bad is it? Hillary is now more likely to wind up in “The Big House” than the White House.

How bad is it? The cover-up of and conspiracy in Benghazi is the least of her worries.

How bad is it? No one is even mentioning the Clinton Foundation – where she accepted $2 billion in bribes … I mean donations … while serving as secretary of state, much of it from foreign governments, while quickly awarding contracts to those same countries and companies. Isn’t that called treason? That’s not even on the radar screen … yet.
www.theblaze.com...

However, Clinton's odds to take the White House are holding steady with bookies at about even money:

www.oddschecker.com...

And shockingly to me, her odds to take the White House at predictit.org increased 2% to 51% today:

www.predictit.org...

How in the world did that happen?

Probably most shocking of all, the predictit.org market for "Will the DOJ open a criminal investigation into Clinton's email this year?" FELL 1% to 53% today:

www.predictit.org...

Who's right then? The bookies and the bettors or theblaze.com? I'll take the smart money over the media any day.

What do you think?

Oh! Da horra!!!!

Benghazi! 4 dead! Taking money from interest groups!!! Shameful!!!


Let's see....Bush sent thousands of Americans to their death in the M.E. to fight for big construction contracts, oil, and drugs to make all his friends obseenly richer then they already were, eerrr I mean excuse me, "to fight Evil Doers!", and robbed the tax payers coffers through record federal spending, that ALSO ended up in his buddies hands through no contest contracts, but somehow he got REELECTED!

Are you hitting the pipe or something? Do you seriously think Benghazi or campaign donations are going to tank a former 1st lady's presidential aspirations, or result in a conviction? Hahahahaha, you must think this is the 50's.

Go back to the pipe.

you seem to know a lot about the pipe. Other than that...not a coherent thought. Surprise!

Is "not a coherent thought" your only response? Do you need a hug?

originally posted by: TWILITE22
a reply to: 727Sky

She is an ill-tempered, violent, loud-mouth, hateful and abusive
woman wants to be President, and have control as Commander in Chief of our Military; the very
Military for which she has shown incredible disdain throughout her public life .

speaking from someone who's been a military spouse for 27 years...
what do you think the military response would be if she by chance was elected? I didn't like her as first lady so I definitely don't want to see her as president.

Honestly IMO the military will carry out it's orders faithfully. They my grumble and say they are not fighting for her which is actually true; they fight for their buds their unit and do the best they can with what they have to work with.. Chain of command works that way unless it really gets insane; then I don't know...? A whole group of Generals (Joint Chief's of Staff) met with Lyndon Johnson to plead for the case of changing to more prefered targets and ending the Viet Nam war.... They were first cussed out and then figuratively thrown out... They wanted to keep their jobs so they did what they were told.. Lyndon was afraid of starting a much bigger war with Russia at the time. Maybe he was right...."what difference does it make now" ? hahahah

a reply to: 727Sky

for some reason my replies aren't showing up? but anyway your probably right...although I would love to see someone in office that would make our military proud to serve under not sure who that would be at this point.If she is elected I can't imagine that scenario there are too many people so unaware and blinded by her activities that some would vote just because she's a woman and those are the ones that scare me.Don't get me wrong I think a woman could do the job but not her anyone but her.We need fresh blood in office someone who will do right by our country...well if anything it should be an interesting election year,we shall see!

originally posted by: muse7
I wish this forum vetted Republican candidates as well as they vet Democrats.

But back on topic....this might be good news as it might make more voters sway towards Bernie...although I wouldn't mind Joe Biden running either.

it should be obvious why.....this site for years now has disproportionately bashed liberals and democrats. there is used to be more on the left here, but a lot of them have left....for all of you that want to see the craziness on the right...www.rightwingwatch.org...

go to the "breaking political news" forum right here, and you'll see the overwhelming right-wing onslaught on Obama, Clintons, liberals, and the left....and that's not even counting the people that want to see anarchy erupt in America, and/or the ones that blame America for everything wrong in the rest of the world.

Appropriate thread to post this. Just saw it today. It would be funny, except it's 100% real, so....it just makes me want to crawl into the fetal position and cry.

originally posted by: jimmyx
go to the "breaking political news" forum right here, and you'll see the overwhelming right-wing onslaught on Obama, Clintons, liberals, and the left....and that's not even counting the people that want to see anarchy erupt in America, and/or the ones that blame America for everything wrong in the rest of the world.

So the OPs thread is untrue? Trying to figure out what this partisan bickering statement has to do with the actual report.

Oh right, you dont have a sound rebuttal so youll just pander, gotcha

I've heard or read the rumor that the Democratic Party is going to sink Hillary and propose a third term for Obama( evangelist perry stone).. It'll be interesting to see if this plays out..

Also a turn of the century prophesy about China and Russia attacking the United States when a female president is in office.. At the time the prophesy was told, the person responsible for it interpreted the female as the whore of Babylon .. He couldn't see a woman ever being president.. I don't recall who gave the prophesy, I'll look around and post it , if I can find it again..

I do see this election as being significant and entertaining at the same time...

Time will tell..

Wishful thinking from The Blaze, the article is meant to stoke anti Hillary sentiment from people who are already anti Hillary.

originally posted by: babybunnies
Wishful thinking from The Blaze, the article is meant to stoke anti Hillary sentiment from people who are already anti Hillary.

or it could be meant to bring out more information about the ongoing investigation.

Hillary is stoking anti-hillary sentiment well enough on her own

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Profusion

1. What do you expect them to do? Crucify their own?

2. A biased source is going to go all in for Clinton right up until she dons prison orange and then start complaining bitterly that she was the victim in all of it and STILL should be POTUS.

3.Sometimes, you don't really think all that much do you.

1. Absolutely Ket. Strictly along party lines, I expect O'Boner
to help (and a LOT) keelhaul the bleached whale with a differential
at the first whiff of one of her aides getting ready to sing about
the missing mail items. There's potential dynamite in that box- and
I expect a monster diversion to get the hounds away from 1600.

2. Not sure about this one, but am almost sure Martha
Stewart got a good parboiling for just insider trading, no?

3. I've taken a lot of heat for caring too damned much: and
the four dead at Benghazi at least to me is potentially a lot worse
than the coverup, indeed if the conspiracy of one could even be
proven. But remember they finally got Capone for tax evasion...

I don't care about the cost of doing business anymore, and like
maybe a lot of others I want to stop thinking about how big a
dust Doberman we can sweep under the hand-tied before even
ONE of the corporatile anchor-wraiths says "Really ?" Maybe,
just maybe by now it's evident Julian Huxley was right-- and we've
finally been multiphasically lobotomized enough to need adult
supervision. I gave up on any hope of our self governance 30 years
ago.
If she actually gets elected President though, I'll keep Barbara
Streisand's promise for all three of us; because it'll be time to GTFO.
promise

a reply to: kellyjay

There already is something wrong with most who associate with being a "liberal" today.

Calling oneself a liberal is a shortcut to being associated with keywords like "intellectual", "charitable", "honest", "involved in community" etc. without actually having to do anything at all. All one needs do is pander with idealistic nonsense. "Free healthcare," "free education," "free housing and cars!" etc. without thinking of the ramifications upon the strained system. Sanders appeals greatly to those masses.

We need both a real conservative, and real liberal, president.

What do I mean? No fake conservative, or one with special interests like Bush(es). A genuine conservative - which in the 18th century would have been considered a real LIBERAL like Thomas Jefferson. People associated with modern liberalism deal with idealism, with distracting emphasis on semantics, instead of reality. Just look on the first few pages in this thread. Those useless people are everywhere.

The problem is, there are so few honest conservatives, and real "liberals".

So its no surprise there's masses who would firmly stand behind Hillary. They'd do so even if she ate her unborn baby/fetus in some Satanic ritual ("it was nutritious and thus enhanced her standard of living. Thus better than being discarded"), was complicit in the murder of 4 country loving soldiers ("they were white supremacist men"), took millions in foreign bribes thru her Clinton Foundation ("It was for the children"), and disobeyed federal law with conducting illegal activities on a private server ("a woman should have a right to privacy. And I believe her claim of innocence as a woman"). Let's not even start on the # she and her husband did near over where I live in Mena.

People really don't understand how the members only club works. This is still a conspiracy site, correct???

I'll say again she WILL NOT go to jail and will at least get the party nom if not the house.

a reply to: Profusion

Bill is going to handle it. Golf with Obama Saturday.

President Obama has had some illustrious golfing buddies on his vacation this summer on Martha’s Vineyard, but perhaps no one who understands the pressures of his job as well as former President Bill Clinton, who joined him today at the Farm Neck Country Club.

abcnews.go.com...

a reply to: jimmyx

Yeah, Creepy Uncle Joe would be a perfect replacement for Hillary.
We need another 'Groper-in-Chief' to replace BOTH Clintons.
www.theblaze.com...

a reply to: Profusion

You do know that The Blaze is just the conservative version of The Onion, right?

someone should just stick a fork in her already

originally posted by: kellyjay
someone should just stick a fork in her already

...we still have to wait through her next act of throwing top aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills to the wolves to try to save her sorry butt.

originally posted by: MOMof3
I think until someone from the justice system comes up with a warrant, people are sick of the talk. Meanwhile, Hillary just keeps chugging along, talking about policies.

Seems to me more like she's chugging along, avoiding debates and telling stories about her mom. She's hoping to coast in on name recognition and being a woman who has lots of experience being entrenched in the political system, NOT on the basis of great policies.

originally posted by: HooHaa
I've heard or read the rumor that the Democratic Party is going to sink Hillary and propose a third term for Obama( evangelist perry stone).. It'll be interesting to see if this plays out..

By law Obama cannot run for a third term. If this law were ever to change, it would not apply to any current or previous president. Basically, Obama will be out in a year no matter what happens.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: jimmyx

Yeah, Creepy Uncle Joe would be a perfect replacement for Hillary.
We need another 'Groper-in-Chief' to replace BOTH Clintons.
www.theblaze.com...

Biden would make a great president. He's on par with Bernie Sanders.