It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: infolurker
Hey, another strange "Coincidence" and an "I told you so".
www.zerohedge.com...
A week before The EPA disastrously leaked millions of gallons of toxic waste into The Animas River in Colorado, this letter to the editor was published in The Silverton Standard & The Miner local newspaper, authored by a retired geologist detailing verbatim, how EPA would foul the Animas River on purpose in order to secure superfund money...
"But make no mistake, within seven days, all of the 500gpm flow will return to Cememnt Creek. Contamination may actually increase... The "grand experiment" in my opinion will fail.
And guess what [EPA's] Mr. Hestmark will say then?
Gee, "Plan A" didn't work so I guess we will have to build a treat¬ment plant at a cost to taxpayers of $100 million to $500 million (who knows).
Reading between the lines, I believe that has been the EPA's plan all along"
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: infolurker
It was the EPA's plan all along to make themselves look completely inept and possibly liable for the damage caused?
THIS article is saying costs may exceed $100 million.
More like, he suspected that their plan was going to fail from the beginning.
Did you know that these mine have been poisoning this river system for decades?
Between 2005 and 2010, three out of four of the fish species that lived in the Upper Animas beneath Silverton died. According to studies by the U.S. Geological Survey, the volume of insects and the number of bug species have plummeted. And since 2006, USGS scientists have found that the water flowing under Bakers Bridge – then downstream, into Durango – carries concentrations of zinc that are toxic to animal life.
www.durangoherald.com...
Yes the EPA messed up on a monumental scale... But they've been pushing for this area to be a superfund site since the 90's. The fish and insect die offs could only be ignored by the local pen pushers for so long..
originally posted by: WalkInSilence
It is odd that the media hasn't picked up this connection. And there has not been a response here either.
This is controversial and very disturbing.
I don't understand, is it actually profitable to create such a catastrophe?
Thank You
originally posted by: diggindirt
a reply to: Flatfish
Who could have guessed that taking a bulldozer to the wall of a containment pond would cause a breach and subsequently a flood? I guess we need people with a bit more education about hydrology aiming bulldozers, eh?
Seriously, people, anyone who actually believes this was a "mistake" is seriously ignorant about how containment ponds and bulldozers work.
originally posted by: Attentionwandered
a reply to: Flatfish
I absolutely agree with you here flatfish. The gold mining/oil industry is destroying the planet, they are the real culprit. But in the end they don't just 'run for the hills'.
You're forgetting these corporations lobby the EPA, and basically call the shots, so that they can keep conducting their business. Thats when I start to get scared of something much bigger!
originally posted by: GovWatch79
a reply to: Flatfish
Private contractor that does the majority of the EPA's work in that region according to the news.
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: xuenchen
Wouldn't the Govt. contractor need to be bonded and insured? Can't they go to the insurance company to pay for this over the taxpayers?