It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: ~Lucidity
You are correct, it is a personal choice.
And I choose not to have my taxes contributed towards the murder of unborn children.
What about my rights and choice?
Our taxes should never be paying for this.
Someday, hopefully, people will wake up and make the right "choice".
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: kellyjay
It's not semantics. It's faulty logic on your part and the part of most right-wingers.
When you pay your taxes, those funds becomes government revenue.
That's just a fact. I know it doesn't fit your argument, so, change your argument.
Or think of it like I do. If I were a citizen of the UK, I'd just consider that my taxes went to pay for abortions, and yours went to pay for Mr. Cameron's limousine, or plumbing repairs at 10 Downing, or bombs or whatever.
Both are equally nonsensical, but my way softens the reality of paying for crap and death.
so who then pays for the abortions on the tax payer/public owned nhs?
ill wait
originally posted by: AboveBoard
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: ~Lucidity
You are correct, it is a personal choice.
And I choose not to have my taxes contributed towards the murder of unborn children.
What about my rights and choice?
Our taxes should never be paying for this.
Someday, hopefully, people will wake up and make the right "choice".
Our tax dollars don't go to abortions in general except, possibly, under extreme circumstances.
Tax dollars DO, however, go to killing people with drones and massive amounts of weaponry that, let's be honest, do a lot of collateral damage to innocent civilians in other countries. I wish I could choose not to fund that, but that's not a choice, is it? War is ugly and should only be undertaken in defense and when absolutely needed, instead it is a Billion dollar industry.
originally posted by: kellyjay
a reply to: dawnstar
sure...here you go
www.lifenews.com...
and yes its legit ....planned parenthood send the pill via mail.
plannedparenthood.org...
which is why i believe that they sent a whole load out that weren't asked for, and billed the government..kinda lends credence
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: kellyjay
a reply to: dawnstar
sure...here you go
www.lifenews.com...
and yes its legit ....planned parenthood send the pill via mail.
plannedparenthood.org...
which is why i believe that they sent a whole load out that werent asked for, and billed the government..kinda lends credence
You certainly quote a lot of "pro-life" websites for some who is pro-choice.
What's up with that?
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
What I don't get is ... pro-life (pro-pregnancy) people claim abortion is ending a potential life prematurely.
So, isn't an IUD that prevents the egg from implanting into the uterine wall ending a potential life prematurely? Isn't preventing ovulation preventing a potential life prematurely?
So is birth control similar to abortion in that it prevents babies who would have otherwise been born to be born?
So I would assume that pro-life (pro-pregnancy, pro-birth) people would also be against birth control. Let's say they manage to get PP to stop doing abortions -- what's next, birth control as well?
The Pro-Life Action League opposes artificial birth control (contraception), not only because it destroys the inherent meaning of the sexual act as a sign of permanent, life-giving love, but because of the disastrous consequences it has wrought on our society - See more at: prolifeaction.org...
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: kellyjay
a reply to: dawnstar
sure...here you go
www.lifenews.com...
and yes its legit ....planned parenthood send the pill via mail.
plannedparenthood.org...
which is why i believe that they sent a whole load out that weren't asked for, and billed the government..kinda lends credence
You certainly quote a lot of "pro-life" websites for someone who is pro-choice.
What's up with that?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: kellyjay
a reply to: dawnstar
sure...here you go
www.lifenews.com...
and yes its legit ....planned parenthood send the pill via mail.
plannedparenthood.org...
which is why i believe that they sent a whole load out that weren't asked for, and billed the government..kinda lends credence
You certainly quote a lot of "pro-life" websites for someone who is pro-choice.
What's up with that?
Ahhhh, you beat me to it - I was just going to say the same thing.
Regarding the lawsuit in the "pro-life" link, I can't see that there was any final ruling on it yet. Sooo, it is just allegations at this point.
originally posted by: kellyjay
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: kellyjay
The government from government revenues.
That's pretty basic ...
where does the government get those revenues? do they pull them out of their a*s?