It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sg1642
Do you realise what a figure eleven looks like at that range? Even through a 338? Never mind two men lying on their belt buckle. To take out two men and their weapon at that range is talent. Ranging shots or not, he holds the record for the longest confirmed kill in history.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: sg1642
Do you realise what a figure eleven looks like at that range? Even through a 338? Never mind two men lying on their belt buckle. To take out two men and their weapon at that range is talent. Ranging shots or not, he holds the record for the longest confirmed kill in history.
Nothing to do with Talent, It's about learning how to shoot then aiming and pulling a trigger...The Weapon and Bullet does the rest of the work. Why do people make it sound like snipers are running the equivalent calculations thru there heads of the likes of NASA landing a spacecraft on Pluto.
Christ you be telling us next he took Earths rotation into account before he pulled the trigger.
I'm not debating the Shot or who killed who with what. A blind man could fire a 50 cal or a .338 into a busy city and could probably kill at a further distance, I'm debating the veracity of the OP's quoted article.
There are more Men than Women in this forum get moist over Men in uniforms, It's not healthy.
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Kapusta
Not asking you to speak on the behalf of Allah just your opinion . it would seem to me they are screwed with the Khuaraiji thing . The reason i ask is if there is an out for these people (isis) then Islam takes a big hit from me . As an outsider to Islam there should be no question , straight to your version of hell .
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: hounddoghowlie
SAS likely have them pissing there little jihad panties right now.
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
One shot is more than believable. But three shots? hard to believe.
Not to mention the sources 'silencers'- they are not silencers, they are suppressors. Suppressors muzzle the retort but do not eliminate it completely, however from that range a suppressed weapon might not be heard but the ricochet of a missed shot might be, hence the steady hand and the patience of a sniper.
But still even one hit from that distance would be a feat, let alone three in quick succession.
originally posted by: Mclaneinc
From what I've seen this had degenerated in to a British Sniper could not do this nonsense, had it been a US sniper I bet zero of this would have happened and it would have been a "best sniper in the world, good 'ole USA".
Please don't keep going down that route, we are supposed to be allies and its rather ironic that we have US guys saying we are trespassing in peoples lands, please, are you for real..Have you looked at various war incursions or sudden tactical or NOT SO tactical strikes.
Both the UK and the US have done it but a beady eye'd little man called Bush Jnr led the way with our pitiful puppy dog Blair agreeing. Nipping in to people land for whatever reason certainly isn't an only British tradition in recent years, I think there's blood on both hands there..
Lets treat this as a saving of a man and a boy from the IS, head shot, arse shot or whatever, it he was hit with that calibre it was a pretty certain kill shot wheresoever it hit.
And lastly, it said the sniper hit and killed 3 people with 3 shots and then someone asked what had happened to one hit one kill.....Confused?
originally posted by: Mclaneinc
From what I've seen this had degenerated in to a British Sniper could not do this nonsense, had it been a US sniper I bet zero of this would have happened and it would have been a "best sniper in the world, good 'ole USA".
Please don't keep going down that route, we are supposed to be allies and its rather ironic that we have US guys saying we are trespassing in peoples lands, please, are you for real..Have you looked at various war incursions or sudden tactical or NOT SO tactical strikes.
Both the UK and the US have done it but a beady eye'd little man called Bush Jnr led the way with our pitiful puppy dog Blair agreeing. Nipping in to people land for whatever reason certainly isn't an only British tradition in recent years, I think there's blood on both hands there..
Lets treat this as a saving of a man and a boy from the IS, head shot, arse shot or whatever, it he was hit with that calibre it was a pretty certain kill shot wheresoever it hit.
And lastly, it said the sniper hit and killed 3 people with 3 shots and then someone asked what had happened to one hit one kill.....Confused?
originally posted by: ken10
a reply to: hounddoghowlie
ISIS militants had decreed that the little boy and his father must die after branding them "infidels" because they refused to denounce their faith. They were just seconds from death when the hero sniper intervened to stop the barbaric killing in the Syrian desert.
And the sniper knew all this from a thousand meters away ?
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
originally posted by: Answer
This thread is proof that ATS can turn anything into an argument.
No it isn't