Strange Clouds in NASA Moon Crossing the Earth Images (EPIC Images)

originally posted by: wastedown
a reply to: eriktheawful

You have never watched the Apollo 11 tape CLEARLY FABRICATING the "Blue Marble" photo which they then passed off as an actual image of the etire Earth? I find that hard to believe, so that likely means you just want to believe.

.

That is a load of crapola. And since you mentioned a hurricane at work in another post, it is well known that Hurricane Bernice's remains are pictured in one of Apollo 11's pictures from the spacecraft, as well as the motion film used by that twat. A near Earth satellite also pictured Bernice, and all the pictures match exactly. Oh! I nearly forgot Apollo 8's pictures, they were Marbless not. No they were marvelous, as was Apollo 17's, 'The blue marble' So, how many times does the same hurricane have to be in a picture?

Let's keep it friendly , Folks.



... and on the Topic not each other.

originally posted by: Lilwayneisadork
a reply to: ngchunter

I don't want to make fun, really believe me, I really don't. Check this:
files.abovetopsecret.com...

where is that black shadowy edge of the balls? that moon in the EPIC pics is just too much fake, my opinion.

The right edge of the moon is facing AWAY from the sun. AWAY. It will not receive any light from the sun or indirect light reflected from the earth.

Seriously, is this really the calibre of the hoaxer's logic?

a reply to: charolais

Thought it would be fun to compare image from weather satellite and the animated globe and moon shot. There is a time difference, but both shot on the same day. Satellite image is of Typhoon Nangka off the coast of Japan.

Source for Satellite Photo

Took the last from of the animated gif which is the general area.

Its strange, in 4 hours and 55 minutes the cloud formations never change..not a single one...

a reply to: charolais

Because it's fake..

originally posted by: D3AD537
Its strange, in 4 hours and 55 minutes the cloud formations never change..not a single one...

originally posted by: D3AD537
a reply to: charolais

Because it's fake..

Another keen mind from the hoaxing crowd!

Answered here:

onebigmonkey
onebigmonkey
Soylent Green Is People

a reply to: GetHyped

im assuming you believe everything these "space" agencies tell us with that remark

a reply to: D3AD537

That's quite an assumption, and one that has nothing to do with the basic meteorology science that debunks your argument.

a reply to: GetHyped

What does meteorology have to do with photoshopping pictures and telling everyone its the real deal?

originally posted by: D3AD537
Its strange, in 4 hours and 55 minutes the cloud formations never change..not a single one...

Not true at all.
h.dropcanvas.com...
The clouds over the Sierra Nevada mountains have developed more in the second frame and the storm off the coast of Baja has spun northward, not to mention the fact that the clouds further up the coast of Cali have changed morphology quite a bit, not just angle. The clouds' motion and development is a perfect match for GOES west satellite imagery over that time span.
h.dropcanvas.com...

a reply to: D3AD537

You made a specific claim (one based on ignorance), that claim was directly addressed.

Now you're trying to play the distraction game by avoiding the rebuttal to your claim.

Just more excellent logic from the keen minds of the hoaxers!

What's this site's motto? "Deny Ignorance".

originally posted by: D3AD537
a reply to: GetHyped

im assuming you believe everything these "space" agencies tell us with that remark

How about you address the evidence he presented instead?

a reply to: GetHyped

the only thing im claiming is that these pics are fake..and I made an assumption about your remark.
I never claimed that you actually believe what the "space agencies" tell us.

You can tell me that clouds are changing but from what im seeing..theyre not. so who are you to say what im seeing is "wrong" ? Is it because its not from your perspective, alone?

Also, assuming you don't believe what these "agencies are telling you, why are you going to argue that these pics are real in the first place..You can watch vids and look at pics all day long about our earth and "space" but none of us have ever been up there..so why would you believe a word they say and come here and say I'm "wrong"

You very well know when something has been faked and photoshopped..You can feel it and see it..ignoring it only suports the lie

have you been up there..? highly doubt it..thats why you here..just like me and the rest of us

a reply to: ngchunter

evidence? i dont consider faking pictures to prove their ideas as evidence. i did and it still looks fake as a cliche' "alien" invasion film from the 80s.. Now wheres your own evidence that this pic is even real at all..without "their" help involved..wheres your own pics..not from someone else you believe is telling you "truth".

a reply to: ngchunter

And to think, that is such a clear picture at a million miles away, exactly, with no stars or other "space-like" stuff in the mix..

originally posted by: teslarocks
a reply to: charolais

Thought it would be fun to compare image from weather satellite and the animated globe and moon shot. There is a time difference, but both shot on the same day. Satellite image is of Typhoon Nangka off the coast of Japan.

Source for Satellite Photo

Took the last from of the animated gif which is the general area.

Thanks for sharing Tesla. I am not exactly seeing where the typhoon is in the EPIC photo, maybe I'm just missing something.

Are you able to find the same break in the clouds on the satellite as we see in the EPIC gif? That's what I'm definitely interested in seeing!

originally posted by: D3AD537
a reply to: ngchunter

And to think, that is such a clear picture at a million miles away, exactly, with no stars or other "space-like" stuff in the mix..

You're really going to use the "no stars in the photo" as a defense?? Do you know how many times this has been debunked when it comes to space/earth/moon photos.

originally posted by: D3AD537
a reply to: ngchunter

evidence? i dont consider faking pictures to prove their ideas as evidence. i did and it still looks fake as a cliche' "alien" invasion film from the 80s.. Now wheres your own evidence that this pic is even real at all..without "their" help involved..wheres your own pics..not from someone else you believe is telling you "truth".

Excuse me sir, you falsely claimed that the photos show no cloud movement. I was one of the ones who demonstrated that it does show cloud movement. See above. Prove that evidence is fake before making such accusations.