FBI investigates Hillary Clinton

a reply to: Gryphon66

She's just a "person of interest" right now.

originally posted by: LeoStarchild
I am inclined to believe since Biden is about to announce, they are throwing her under the bus. There is a shift in the Democrat party.

Its always been that way.......if you look back they have always distanced themselves from her, shes toxic

They dont want anything to do with hillary, and will only defend her just enough to make it look vaguely like some sort of loose cohesiveness.......

They are ready to be done with hillary

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Gryphon66

She's just a "person of interest" right now.

Did you get that from the article? Or any source?

Or is that merely your own "opinion"? Or are you just throwing it in for chuckles?

Really, this is why conservatives are a dying breed.

It's not the policies in general, it's the utter, rampant dishonesty.

a reply to: ladyinwaiting

What about these laws?

Look here: www.archives.gov...

And here please: www.ecfr.gov...:3.0.10.2.10&rgn=div5


More specifically this:

§1220.30 What are an agency's records management responsibilities?
(a) Under 44 U.S.C. 3101, the head of each Federal agency must make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency. These records must be designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and of persons directly affected by the agency's activities.

(b) Under 44 U.S.C. 3102, the head of each Federal agency must establish and maintain an active, continuing program for the economical and efficient management of the records of the agency.

(c) Agency records management programs must provide for:

(1) Effective controls over the creation, maintenance, and use of records in the conduct of current business; and

(2) Cooperation with the Archivist and the Administrator of GSA in applying standards, procedures, and techniques designed to improve the management of records, promote the maintenance and security of records deemed appropriate for preservation, and facilitate the segregation and destruction of records of temporary value.

Hillary really needs to bow out gracefully and focus on being a grandma now and groomer extraordinaire for Chelsea's future political endeavors. If she sticks around any longer, she is going to taint the waters for Chelsea.

a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

I really hope so, I mean, I have disdain for the democrat party.. But I REALLY dislike her..

originally posted by: queenofswords
Hillary really needs to bow out gracefully and focus on being a grandma now and groomer extraordinaire for Chelsea's future political endeavors. If she sticks around any longer, she is going to taint the waters for Chelsea.

I happen to agree with you about Clinton. For a myriad of reasons, she is not the right choice for President.

Now, did you have a source, any source, for your "person of interest" comment?

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Honesty requires the following.

1. Name the law that Hillary Clinton allegedly broke in this scenario painted in the OP.

2. Acknowledge the fact that the OP's Source STATES OUTRIGHT that Hillary Clinton is not being investigated.

YEAH! HILLARY 2016 WHA HOO! The Clintons ROCK MAN! Remember the good old days in the White House? Slick Willie, Vince Foster, Paula Jones, Kathleen Wiley and who could ever forget Monica Lewinsky! Bring back them good ole days! YEAH! Oooh! Oooh! and lets never forget TRAVELGATE!

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Gryphon66

She's just a "person of interest" right now.

Did you get that from the article? Or any source?

Or is that merely your own "opinion"? Or are you just throwing it in for chuckles?

Really, this is why conservatives are a dying breed.

It's not the policies in general, it's the utter, rampant dishonesty.

Get a grip, Gryph. Note the quotes around my words. You do know what those imply, right? Chill.

a reply to: smitastrophe

The cork that popped.

The little engine that could.

"Really, this is why conservatives are a dying breed.

It's not the policies in general, it's the utter, rampant dishonesty"

Conservative dishonesty ?
Which other person, besides Hillary, of any stripe, has ever kept government emails in his or her control ?
Clintons are beacons of honesty ?

Cognitive dissonance much ?

a reply to: Gryphon66

I am pretty sure that this was not from some news source, just general awareness of reality and perception of the obvious.

a reply to: queenofswords

LOL.

So, your argument is prevarication by punctuation?

The article linked in the OP states clearly that Hillary Clinton is not in any way under investigation.

The OP is disingenuous, as is your flippant comment.

But beyond all that, why try to hoax this stuff?

OP knows what the article says. Everyone on this thread knows what the article says.

And the article says that Clinton is NOT under investigation.

Why pretend otherwise if it's not just another "I hate Hillary (btw BENGHAZI)" thread?

Don't you ever get tired of the utter crap?

originally posted by: smitastrophe
a reply to: Gryphon66

I am pretty sure that this was not from some news source, just general awareness of reality and perception of the obvious.

What?

Do you mean the OP's article from The Washington Post

I guess you didn't bother to read that in your zealotry to damn Clinton, eh?

Sorry for the egg on your face.

a reply to: M5xaz

Which other person, besides Hillary, of any stripe, has ever kept government emails in his or her control ?

What about David Petraus? He was merely using a gmail account for writing love letters to his mistress and yet he was canned over similar allegations for misuse of classified government email. How is this situation any different?

www.washi... ngtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/11/12/heres-the-e-mail-trick-petraeus-and-broadwell-used-to-communicate

originally posted by: smitastrophe
a reply to: M5xaz

Which other person, besides Hillary, of any stripe, has ever kept government emails in his or her control ?

What about David Petraus? He was merely using a gmail account for writing love letters to his mistress and yet he was canned over similar allegations for misuse of classified government email. How is this situation any different?

www.washi... ngtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/11/12/heres-the-e-mail-trick-petraeus-and-broadwell-used-to-communicate

And not only that. The FBI raided his home to retrieve papers!

a reply to: Gryphon66

No egg and no worries.


I can spot a lack of integrity when I see it, that's all. I don't need to gather mounds of information to prove to myself that Hillary Clinton is a liar. All I have to do is look back at her history, I can make up my own mind.

a reply to: queenofswords

That is what I don't understand about this whole situation, why hasn't her home been raided for the server or ANY other media that may contain information, backups, etc..

originally posted by: smitastrophe
a reply to: Gryphon66

No egg and no worries.

I can spot a lack of integrity when I see it, that's all. I don't need to gather mounds of information to prove to myself that Hillary Clinton is a liar. All I have to do is look back at her history, I can make up my own mind.

You don't need all those needless facts and silly evidence to convict someone in your own mind. Got it.

Thankfully, you aren't in control of the US justice system, eh?