It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: Bluntone22
Here is what he said in its entirety, not a cobbled up edited video.
youtu.be...
I doubt it'll make a difference. People would rather take everything out of context and continue to be upset instead of getting all the facts.
They'll whine about this CEO but I don't see anyone whining about celebrities who make as much if not more.
People act like if the folks at the top weren't getting all this money, it would go somewhere more useful. That's a pipe dream.
I paid $8 for a movie ticket this week just so Tom cruise can make 20 million. What a greedy jerk!
How's that? Lol
I don't know what Cruise is worth, but as a union sag_afTra and iATSE, making movies is hard damn work. Try being an extra to get experience.
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
Whitacre actually received a retirement package totaling $158 million.
Gramm is a classic example of what is wrong with American politics.
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: TrueBrit
Phil Gramm is one of the scumbags that helped to crash the economy by pushing to deregulate the banking industry.
originally posted by: Oouthere
It was actually post tax 158.5 million dollars, $40,000 per year for country club dues, $12,000 per year vehicle lease, 10 hours per month on a company jet, and health care for life.
originally posted by: MountainLaurel
Phil Gramm's "tantrum" is quite telling....if he believes his buddy was screwed out of enough retirement money at over 75 million......what do you suppose he believes his retirement package should be ?
originally posted by: neo96
Lets see now.
AT and T.
en.wikipedia.org...
Whose revenue in 2014 was $132 billion dollars.
Whose operating income was $13 billion dollars.
Whose total assets was $292 billion dollars.
Let the CEO who made decisions to keep,grow, and maintain those figures.
Walked away with a measely $75 million bucks.
Well I wouldn't be too happy either.
originally posted by: neo96
Lets see now.
AT and T.
en.wikipedia.org...
Whose revenue in 2014 was $132 billion dollars.
Whose operating income was $13 billion dollars.
Whose total assets was $292 billion dollars.
Let the CEO who made decisions to keep,grow, and maintain those figures.
Walked away with a measely $75 million bucks.
Well I wouldn't be too happy either.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: TrueBrit
Phil Gramm is one of the scumbags that helped to crash the economy by pushing to deregulate the banking industry.
Yes.
He was "one of".
One of millions.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Answer
I don't have a problem with ceo's making 'bank'.
That use to be the American dream.
Why settle for 'scraps'?
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: TrueBrit
Phil Gramm is one of the scumbags that helped to crash the economy by pushing to deregulate the banking industry.
Yes.
He was "one of".
One of millions.
Sorry but millions of people were not pushing to deregulate the banks. Only the banks and their lapdogs in the government was pushing for that.
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: TrueBrit
Phil Gramm is one of the scumbags that helped to crash the economy by pushing to deregulate the banking industry.
Yes.
He was "one of".
One of millions.
Sorry but millions of people were not pushing to deregulate the banks. Only the banks and their lapdogs in the government was pushing for that.
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Answer
I don't have a problem with ceo's making 'bank'.
That use to be the American dream.
Why settle for 'scraps'?
It's also the American dream for people to be treated equally. So how does this guy being paid hundreds of times more than his employees fit into that American dream.
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Answer
I don't have a problem with ceo's making 'bank'.
That use to be the American dream.
Why settle for 'scraps'?
It's also the American dream for people to be treated equally. So how does this guy being paid hundreds of times more than his employees fit into that American dream.