Discovery Of Underground Bosnian Pyramid Tunnels

originally posted by: skywatcher44
You are in the bigger camp who
keep shouting " Nothing to see here move along "

Well, there is nothing to see - if they actually were pyramids the contour lines of a map of the area would clearly show them.... but they do not!

a reply to: hellobruce

Hell, if they were 30,000 year old pyramids, we'd still see some kind of evidence on the rocks themselves.

originally posted by: Kantzveldt
Anyway i'd like to discuss here what these tunnels could have been for

irna.lautre.net...

originally posted by: IofRa
a reply to: Marduk

I've seen qualified geologists claim Yonaguni was naturally formed...it doesn't take a Phd. in Geology to see that is complete bullocks

It doesnt take a Phd in geology to see that they are quite correct

IBut t may take a lack of any basic understanding of simple geological processes to think it cannot be naturally formed

Just leaving these videos here:

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: TheBIHPyramids
Just leaving these videos here:

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

I would follow her into any Bosnian tunnel.

None of those videos convince me it's a pyramid.

I've actually been to the "tunnels"...to my untrained eye...they dont appear to be...tunnels. We went deep inside...but honestly...I have not seen anything resembling "man made". Just dirt and stone. It appears to me they are making the tunnels as they dig.

That's just my uneducated opinion.

originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
I've actually been to the "tunnels"...to my untrained eye...they dont appear to be...tunnels. We went deep inside...but honestly...I have not seen anything resembling "man made". Just dirt and stone. It appears to me they are making the tunnels as they dig.

That's just my uneducated opinion.

Well, that does make them manmade. Just very recently manmade. like most of the other "evidence" .....

a reply to: AndyMayhew

What I meant was....nothing in those "tunnels" suggest ancient human intervention.

originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
I've actually been to the "tunnels"...to my untrained eye...they dont appear to be...tunnels. We went deep inside...but honestly...I have not seen anything resembling "man made". Just dirt and stone. It appears to me they are making the tunnels as they dig.

That's just my uneducated opinion.

Tell me how nature can build the dry-walls?

originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
a reply to: AndyMayhew

What I meant was....nothing in those "tunnels" suggest ancient human intervention.

You must remember that these tunnels are at least 30 000 years old (if we follow the C-14 datings).

originally posted by: AndyMayhew

originally posted by: Kantzveldt
Anyway i'd like to discuss here what these tunnels could have been for

irna.lautre.net...

Wikipedia is using Irna France as a reference, which is absurd, because she/he is an anonymous blogger and how can an encyclopedia use blogs as a reference?

My article about the Wikipedia issue.

thebihlover.wordpress.com...

My article about the Bosnian Sun Pyramid:

thebihlover.wordpress.com...

a reply to: TheBIHPyramids


Interesting pic for sure. I havent seen that one while I was down there.

The most I've seen that could have been interpreted as something "artificialy made"...is that huge megalith...but it's irregular shape makes a case for simply nature doing it's busyness. You could not for certain tell that it's not natural.

Now back to this pic...though it's interesting...does it make a case for pyramids or the tunnels ? Is there more ? or is this a unique find ?

originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
a reply to: TheBIHPyramids


Interesting pic for sure. I havent seen that one while I was down there.

The most I've seen that could have been interpreted as something "artificialy made"...is that huge megalith...but it's irregular shape makes a case for simply nature doing it's busyness. You could not for certain tell that it's not natural.

Now back to this pic...though it's interesting...does it make a case for pyramids or the tunnels ? Is there more ? or is this a unique find ?

There are tens of side tunnels and dry-walls in the Ravne tunnels.

Here you have two more dry-walls. Like you see, nature can't make these kind of walls.

Is the Bosnian pyramid even pyramid shaped, I know it looks pyramid shaped from one photographic angle but what about the other angles? Also is it symmetrical?

I'm not convinced it is a pyramid yet and as for the tunnels water often carves out underground tunnels over time.

originally posted by: zinc12
Is the Bosnian pyramid even pyramid shaped, I know it looks pyramid shaped from one photographic angle but what about the other angles? Also is it symmetrical?

I'm not convinced it is a pyramid yet and as for the tunnels water often carves out underground tunnels over time.

Please read my article, where I discuss the shape of the Bosnian Sun Pyramid:

thebihlover.wordpress.com...

Well, the Ravne tunnels are definitely not carved out by water, because there are two materials in the tunnel. The first one is the walls, which is conglomerate and the second material is the filling-material which is more sand-ish.

Here you have a picture:



Like you see, the brown material is the filling material, and the second material is the walls. Again, you can see a dry-wall which is blocking the side tunnels.

a reply to: zinc12

In this video, you can see how the Bosnian Sun Pyramid is shaped.

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: TheBIHPyramids
a reply to: zinc12

In this video, you can see how the Bosnian Sun Pyramid is shaped.

www.youtube.com...

It is clearly not pyramid shaped nor symmetrical therefore doesn't display intelligent design since humans have a tendency to build symmetrical structures, or at least try to.

originally posted by: zinc12

originally posted by: TheBIHPyramids
a reply to: zinc12

In this video, you can see how the Bosnian Sun Pyramid is shaped.

www.youtube.com...

It is clearly not pyramid shaped nor symmetrical therefore doesn't display intelligent design since humans have a tendency to build symmetrical structures, or at least try to.

The south side is not symetrical and there are a lot of hypothesis about that.

From my article:

On the southern side it does not look like a pyramid that much. There are different opionions of what happened or why the side looks like that. The first opinion is that there has been a major landslide of the pyramid because some people suggest that there was a river going between the Sun pyramid and Love pyramid and that could made the landslide. The second opinion is that the southern side was destroyed because the locals needed material for their houses. The third opinion is that the southern side is made like that and that the pyramid is triangular with three sides and not four. Writer Jock Doubleday explored the blocks in the middle of the Love and Sun pyramid and it looks like the pyramids was connected at the first place.

thebihlover.wordpress.com...

While the south side is not symetrical, you have other sides, which are north, east and west, that is symetrical. You must remember that the stucture is 30 000 years old, and you must not compare this pyramid with other pyramids, like Egyptian pyramids. Furthermore there has been many civilizations in the area that could have used this structure for some purposes and the vegetation has of course destroyed some of the structure.

Here you have a great picture, showing the sides of the Bosnian Sun Pyramid:

If some of you have any questions, you can just ask.

Here you have some archaeological reports.

2012:

docs.google.com...

2013:

piramidasunca.ba...

2014:

piramidasunca.ba...

The archaeological report for 2015 will be published, most likely, in June 2016. Meanwhile you can watch this video, where the archaeologist is talking about the 2015 archaeological season and the Bosnian Pyramids: www.youtube.com...