BOMBSHELL: Investigator Says Stemexpress Bought INTACT Dead Babies From Planned Parenthood

Well, now. THIS certainly explains a great deal.

Undercover investigator David Daleiden tells CNN the reason StemExpress is trying to suppress the video he took of its CEO on May 22 is because the company doesn’t want anyone to know it bought whole intact dead babies from Planned Parenthood.

Daleiden said on CNN, “In a meeting with their top leadership, they admitted that they sometimes get fully intact fetuses shipped to their laboratory from the abortion clinics they work with, and that could be prima facie evidence of born alive infants. And so that’s why they’re trying to suppress that videotape and they’re very scared of it.”

On May 22, Daleiden and his team had lunch with StemExpress CEO Cate Dyer and other senior personnel from the company that is the main buyer of freshly killed baby parts from Planned Parenthood. As the Center for Medical Progress has released videos, four so far, it is certain that anyone who met with Daleiden, who was posing as CEO of a fictitious company called BioMax, would become worried about what they might have said. Apparently StemExpress talked about things that may shock America and any future stockholders of the as-yet privately held company.

StemExpress filed a lawsuit against Daleiden earlier this week in hopes of stopping the video and other material from being distributed. They are claiming the meeting was confidential and that Daleiden signed a confidentiality agreement. A Superior Court Judge in Los Angeles rejected one claim by StemExpress outright on Monday evening, but ordered a very narrow temporary restraining order related to that one video on Tuesday.

It is now clear why StemExpress is fighting so hard to suppress the video.

www.breitbart.com...

twitter.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT

This is old. It was 'bombshell' last time because armchair experts said it couldn't be done without partial birth abortion. The quote doesn't name PP in specific.



The article even misquotes the investigator. Breitbart? What do you expect.


Twitter as a source?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Thanks for posting.

Appreciate you keeping the story alive, unlike some, who'd treat you like a dentist on safari.

I'm surprised that CNN even published or offered air time to CMP. A rarity.

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: IAMTAT

Thanks for posting.

Appreciate you keeping the story alive, unlike some, who'd treat you like a dentist on safari.

. Who wants to jail the OP?

That was a pretty cheap thread drift.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: IAMTAT

Thanks for posting.

Appreciate you keeping the story alive, unlike some, who'd treat you like a dentist on safari.

The dentist on Safari should go to jail. He broke the law. There were no laws broken in this topic. Who wants to jail the OP?

Crude attempt to derail. Stay on topic, please.

originally posted by: chuck258
I'm surprised that CNN even published or offered air time to CMP. A rarity.

Biotech companies paid higher ad rates.

a reply to: beezzer A judge has granted a restraining order that stops most of the remaining videos from being released. It is all bunk.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: IAMTAT

Thanks for posting.

Appreciate you keeping the story alive, unlike some, who'd treat you like a dentist on safari.

. Who wants to jail the OP?

That was a pretty cheap thread drift.

I know you sympathy lies with Cecil.



After all, he was pro-choice.

In a meeting with their top leadership, they admitted that they sometimes get fully intact fetuses shipped to their laboratory from the abortion clinics they work with

No wonder they need a firm full of lawyers now.

Bankruptcy is next.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: IAMTAT

Thanks for posting.

Appreciate you keeping the story alive, unlike some, who'd treat you like a dentist on safari.

The dentist on Safari should go to jail. He broke the law. There were no laws broken in this topic. Who wants to jail the OP?

Crude attempt to derail. Stay on topic, please.

I didn't bring up the dentist.

They are claiming the meeting was confidential and that Daleiden signed a confidentiality agreement.

Well *of COURSE* they claim it's all "confidential".

Good luck with that argument.

a reply to: ketsuko I didn't bring up the Lion or the dentist. . Now we have 4 or 5 posts mentioning lion and dentist.

a reply to: ketsuko

Puts an ironic spin on the song 'BORN FREE'

originally posted by: xuenchen

They are claiming the meeting was confidential and that Daleiden signed a confidentiality agreement.

Well *of COURSE* they claim it's all "confidential".

Good luck with that argument.

It depends on what the contract said. Real journalists will not normally sign those, undercover or not.

a reply to: xuenchen

And of course if he signed a confidentiality agreement there may be some repercussions.

Apparently StemExpress talked about things that may shock America and any future stockholders of the as-yet privately held company.

This quote is from the OP's source and I have to ask, who cares if people are outraged? All we need to care about is if laws were broken.

The knee-jerk, emotional crap is irrelevant. Did they break laws or is this just a witch hunt that will result in damaging an American private business because some people can't fathom the thought of other people having freedoms upheld by the Supreme Court?

Just for fun, let's forget about lions for a second ... and look at the actual CNN article?

Rather than merely what right-wing media junk sites want to spin it into? Is that fair?

CNN.com

Cowart said Planned Parenthood lawyers declined to enter into a contract with the individuals pretending to be researchers [aka the con artists at the "Center for Medical Progress" - note Gryph] after seeing the contract.

"Our legal counsel provided line item edits to their proposed contract where we again clarified that we would strictly adhere to laws. Our staff asked probing questions about their process and didn't enter into an agreement when those questions weren't answered," she said.

The White House on Thursday waded into the debate, calling the group behind the sting videos "extremists on the right."

"There's ample reason to think that this is merely the tried and true tactic that we have seen from some extremists on the right to edit this video and selectively release an edited version of the video that grossly distorts the position of the person who is actually speaking on the video," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said. "And Planned Parenthood has indicated that's what has occurred here."

Words in brackets mine.

My intact, stillborn twin boys went to a company like this for genetic testing and research. Not a bombshell.

ETA: Dude's micro-tics were a bit outta control. Them now hiding behind journalism, investigative or otherwise, is a slap in the face to all journalists too.

Keep on trying, guys. Meanwhile, abortions will remain legal, despite your best efforts.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: xuenchen

They are claiming the meeting was confidential and that Daleiden signed a confidentiality agreement.

Well *of COURSE* they claim it's all "confidential".

Good luck with that argument.

It depends on what the contract said. Real journalists will not normally sign those, undercover or not.

What "contract"?

Al Capone comes to mind.

#allmafiafamiliesmatter