It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Kapusta
If you are looking for a wager, i would go with betting how many bullets he would have in him and how many bullets missed .....
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
[url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/why-did-police-shoot-dead-unarmed-man--azelle-rodney-seven-years-ago-8084763.html]
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
originally posted by: IslandOfMisfitToys
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
"Hey guys! This good thing happened in a country!"
"This means that the other country is BAD!"
"But, that good thing happens in the other country sometimes too."
"BAD."
"Hey guys! This BAD thing happens ALL THE TIME in a country"
"At about a million to one ratio compared to other civilized countries"
So yes......"BAD"
Oh look it happens in the UK too
No seriously it does
I can keep going
Oh hey, Police in the US subdue armed people without deadly force!
"Look how much better we are!"
originally posted by: IslandOfMisfitToys
originally posted by: CJCrawley
a reply to: Kapusta
I'm sorry, I'm not seeing the advantage of subduing rather than shooting, a violent, knife-wielding nut job.
He probably wont serve any significant jail time and will remain a danger to the general public.
Would you see the advantage if it was YOUR brother with a mental illness and having an episode?
I bet you would.......
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: CJCrawley
a reply to: Kapusta
I'm sorry, I'm not seeing the advantage of subduing rather than shooting, a violent, knife-wielding nut job.
Because everyone had a RIGHT to a trial. You cant have a trial if you are dead.
Only in extreme circumstances should the police kill.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: crazyewok
Oh yes, your specific UK brand of human is superior to the US brand of human!
Is that what you want to hear?
originally posted by: CJCrawley
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: CJCrawley
a reply to: Kapusta
I'm sorry, I'm not seeing the advantage of subduing rather than shooting, a violent, knife-wielding nut job.
Because everyone had a RIGHT to a trial. You cant have a trial if you are dead.
Only in extreme circumstances should the police kill.
I merely said I'm not seeing the advantage, that's all. There's no advantage to me that the police subdued the man instead of shooting him.
For people who would protect the rights of criminals yes, I see the advantage; for me, no.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: IslandOfMisfitToys
If my bi-polar brother somehow got access to a weapon and started waving around at the police, I would be incredibly saddened that his life was ended, but I would also know that a police officer did what he was trained to do.
Then I'd start asking questions as to how my bi-polar brother, who was apparently prone to this kind of behavior got off his meds and got access to a weapon.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: crazyewok
Oh yes, your specific UK brand of human is superior to the US brand of human!
Is that what you want to hear?
Thats not what I said,
American come from the same gentic stock as us anyway so thats a stupid comparison.
What im saying is british police are superior to American cops, not because they are British but because we actually have recruitment standards and training.