Possible MH-370 debris found on Reunion Island?

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: mortex

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: nelloh62

With one part and that piece of a suitcase already having washed up, I'd say it's quite likely there will be other items...

What are the chances that after 18 months, a part of the plane and a suitcase from that plane both wash up on the same remote island?

While one hand distracts you over here, over there the other hand....

Given the way the currents operate in the area, the chances are damn good, actually.

Edit: This is hardly a "remote island" either....

Everything is not a goddam conspiracy. Tragedies happen.

Probably also worth pointing out that other items will likely wash up on the coast of South Africa too, the only reason they have been discovered on this island is because it's the first obstacle. The debris will be carried on the current in whichever way it is moving, and if it's come from the estimated region to the West of Australia it's likely to send similar debris on to the tip of South Africa.

a reply to: Rocker2013

Yes, quite likely. I suspect we'll know a lot more in the coming days and weeks.

a reply to: mortex

Not being flippant but that looks like a Chinese suitcase to me no offence intended.

a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

Well thats it then, it's all a conspiracy, 'cos I didn't get the memo either !!!

The buoyancy aids in the aircraft, what would be the chance of them making it that far? I know, it's a daft question, but are they designed to float forever, or would they eventually degrade

a reply to: SONOFTHEMORNING

And I love when people that don't know what they're talking about go off about things line an expert.

The -26HER is part of the -200ER family. Just like with all Boeing aircraft the -200 is slightly different with different operators. Malaysia is going to have a different layout then United does, who has a different layout than British Airways does. There's no website for the -2H6ER because Malaysia is the only one that uses that particular version. They don't have websites for every single airlines variant.

British flies the 777-236(ER). Japan flies the 777-246(ER). There's no page on them either. You going to say they don't exist either?

a reply to: SONOFTHEMORNING

Huh!?

You haven't a clue what you are talking about. Go onto a dedicated civilian aviation forum and learn something. If you presented your "evidence" on such a forum you would be laughed at. Why the ignorance?

Boeing 777-2H6ER

H6 is the customer code for Malaysia Airlines

Wiki Link

An example would be a Boeing 747-400 ordered by British Airways would be a Boeing 747-436 (36 being the customer code). The codes do not change if the aircraft is subsequently sold as they reflect the original configuration of the aircraft.

Now look on the Wiki Boeing customer codes and see some reality!

Yes Boeing 777-200ER were fitted with Trent 892s. Oh look from 1999! No doubt you will be informing ATS members that the Flight Global pages have been fabricated

Boeing 777-200ER 2 x 89,8901b Rolls-Royce Trent 892 or 2 x 93,2601b Trent 895 or 2 x 93,8001b General Electric GE90-94B or 2 x 90,1101b Pratt & PW4098 turbofan

www.flightglobal.com...


From 1998!

777-200ER
2 x Pratt & Whitney PW4090 turbofan or 2 x 400kN Rolls-Royce Trent 892 turbofan or 2 x 409kN Ge Aircraft Engines GE90 turbofan

www.flightglobal.com...

I thought this was a very interesting and informative article and might give some insight to some that want to be caught up.

I find it fascinating that Biologists will be able to help in this mystery.

www.theguardian.com...

Local officials have confirmed they've begun a sea, air, and ground search for more debris and they do believe it's from the missing flight.

I'd say we will be hearing very very soon the internal serial numbers on each frame part belongs to MH370.

I spoke to an old colleague this morning (their evening in OZ) and he said the delamination (hope I got that right) is unique to what only 777-20OER would have happen.

To take away all doubt, the Réunion news site Clicanoore took a picture of the serial number, the serial number is 657BB

Look it up in the aircraft maintenance manual, 06-44-00 pag 235.

This is conclusive, now i wonder if they have a good insight of the ocean currents during the last 18 months.

If this is the one. Someone wanted this to be found right now.

The Q is:

What do we miss while looking at this?

originally posted by: yeahsurexxx
If this is the one. Someone wanted this to be found right now.

The Q is:

What do we miss while looking at this?

Nothing, unless one is an idiot.

Tell me, do you struggle to blink and breathe at the same time?

Haven't read a single post, but I bet within the first three there is the obligatory "Yeah, something doesn't feel right to me here."

originally posted by: SONOFTHEMORNING
MAS370 was faked. If they found a plane, they were meant to find it.

Reasons why MAS370 never existed:

The model number for MAS370 doesn't exit. Boeing never built one. And it could not be a reconfiguration of a base model, as that would have to be issued by Boeing under aviation safety. According to Boeing's site. This model WAS NEVER BUILT!!!

If we were to assume that the plane configuration for MAS370, was a base model that IS listed on the Boeing website, then that model NEVER CAME OUT with the engines they claim were on MAS370.

So we have a plane that was never built, with engines that never came out on the base model for that plane.

Good so far.

Next, the flight (route) number designation for that plane was only created 2 days before the flight. The flight route does not exist. There is no official flight data for that flight number prior to days before the flight.

So a plane that was never build, with engines that never came out on the closest model that was built, flying on a flight number and route created days earlier especially for the crash!!!

Lastly, no mention of the fact that if you trace the serial number for this plane back, that it was actually one of two planes involved in an incident where it 'clipped the wing' of another Malaysian Airlines flight whilst taxing on the tarmac at an airport.

Anyone remember this???

Good luck finding anything about it on Google!!! They've all but made it 'vanish'.

They don't want anyone to realise that this is actually one of those two planes that clipped wings.

Why??? Besides it being a different model, with different engines, and different flight number designation and history???

Why indeed???

Why also, was the designation of the plane altered by the media at the time of the incident???

The first initial reports in the media about the plane were about MAS370. (M)ALAYSIAN (A)IRLINES (S)ERVICE, though this has been written up as SYSTEM. *Sigh*

MAS370, was then changed in the way it was written by the media to become MAS/MH370. And they used both for a little bit .. until ...

They then dropped the MAS to being only MH370. What does the H stand for? MH makes absolutely no sense as an acronym. The fact this was altered and adopted, is for the most ridiculous reasons you could ever believe.

MAS/SAM became MH/HM. To try convert SAM (The hidden name of God. Seriously, look up the meaning of the name SAM), to HER MAJESTY.

For one particular bitch, to try 'clip wings' with SAM to make MAS(SAM) ... they LOVE their reflections) into MH (HM).

The really stupid, and amusing thing about them trying to play this perception game, is that HM can also mean HIS MAJESTY, and therefore STILL REFERS TO SAMUEL/SAMAEL.

This was all faked. It never happened.

And any plane they find, was planted to be found or from another plane.

I had a remote viewing of this a week before it happened. There was nobody on-board the plane which flew a decoy flight pattern, and I could see a military jet escort off its left wing. Guess what sort of 'Coalition' jet it looked like???

Aaaaaand here we have the obligatory load of road apples. Took until page 2 though, lol. --facepalm--

originally posted by: jaffo
Haven't read a single post, but I bet within the first three there is the obligatory "Yeah, something doesn't feel right to me here."

Yep. Several....It boggles the mind.

originally posted by: yeahsurexxx
If this is the one. Someone wanted this to be found right now.

The Q is:

What do we miss while looking at this?

You think TPTB are so good they can control the currents and the tides? It must really suck to live in your version of reality.

Well there goes my Alien Mothership Abduction theory...Damn it.

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
Well there goes my Alien Mothership Abduction theory...Damn it.

Oh, don't give up so easily. Maybe the alien mothership had the plane until just last week, and then they dropped it into the ocean near the island? Huh? Huh?

If you draw a straight line from last position to nearest airport and keep on going you run into madagascar.
Onboard electrical fire mixing with oxygen lines will blow a hole in the plane ( freeze in minutes and no oxygen) forcing a nose dive to 1 km to regain atmosphere and temperature.
Autopilot to airport but it never landed because everyone succumbed to smoke inhilation.
I mapped all this out last year on google earth with all the sightings, times and locations reported to confirm this direction and probable airspeed.
What I am wondering is what Diego Garcias fighter plane response was to this unresponsive plane passing by its nuclear bomber fleet. Radars were reportedly down that day.

wow....been busy most day so not up to speed yet. Don't you all forget this is result from pings aussie PM reckoned he/we heard a year or so ago ?????? Well I guess ol' Angus Houston was right after all ..