It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
bsbray11 : Blanchard analyzes seismographs for a living? I think you're confused.
(LT : he's an editor/journalist for Implosion World, paid by PROTEC, it's owner.)
-snip-
All you have to do is look at the seismic records to see that massive amounts of energy was released into the bedrock just prior to its collapse. More energy, in fact, than the whole global collapse represented. That's case closed in my book :
The building *not falling*, was more energetic, than the whole building falling. That goes well along with the fact that it free-fell through 7 stories and therefore none of its PE was actually used to crush the building.
originally posted by: CALGARIAN
Yes, this was def FINALLY resolved... back in 2001.
The MASSIVE amount of fire debris that crushed the side of the building caused it to collapse.
WHY (or who) would have planted explosives in WTC7? lol.
WHY (or who) would have planted explosives in WTC7? lol.
originally posted by: deloprator20000
The fall of WTC 7 is the most difficult for skeptics to explain and the explanations they do offer often do not stand up to scrutiny.
up to 0:55:26.
"When I walked into the revolving doors of the lobby, the last door before you get to the outside, and I was gonna walk around the building and go up to the Postal Service to get some special stamps, and, eh, I had no sooner walked out the door when I heard a wishing roaring noise, eh, and I looked to my left and I see a friend of mine, ehh, with terror on his face racing for cover. And then I saw several other people that I didn't recognize, also heading for cover. And, eh, I looked, eh, I heard the, a Boomm and the ground tremble, and, eh, the next thing I know I was looking up to the roof and I seeing stuff coming off the roof. I figured my best bet would be to get back into the building, so to avoid the stuff coming off the roof. I know as soon as I was going back into the revolving door, when, eh, eh, all of a sudden it seems like the whole lobby, the door I was in, and everything filled up with a yellowish brownish, eh, combustible mixture.
I did not really smell anything different, but, there was not... it took so quickly to happen, it was like a tenth of a second and the next thing I know is a major explosion, by which I am now thrown back out through both of these revolving doors and back outside underneath the overhang where the taxis were coming. I was on fire.
I quickly put my shirt out and kinda douche my hair and just started to stagger away, as fast as I could."
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: CALGARIAN
WHY (or who) would have planted explosives in WTC7? lol.
Because Silverstien made some money on the insurance claims and WTC 7 held some pretty important docs.
As for who, probably Turner Construction, the same people who did all the work on towers 1&2.
They even fire proofed the almost the exact floors that got hit.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: CALGARIAN
WHY (or who) would have planted explosives in WTC7? lol.
Because Silverstien made some money on the insurance claims and WTC 7 held some pretty important docs.
As for who, probably Turner Construction, the same people who did all the work on towers 1&2.
They even fire proofed the almost the exact floors that got hit.
originally posted by: BlueJacket
Your response evokes more laughter from me. A cursory understanding of general Western history should suffice in answering your question of who and why...amazing
a reply to: CALGARIAN
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: CALGARIAN
WHY (or who) would have planted explosives in WTC7? lol.
Because Silverstien made some money on the insurance claims and WTC 7 held some pretty important docs.
As for who, probably Turner Construction, the same people who did all the work on towers 1&2.
They even fire proofed the almost the exact floors that got hit.
Do you actually have any evidence for these claims?
I would like to see it.
originally posted by: CALGARIAN
Yes, this was def FINALLY resolved... back in 2001.
The MASSIVE amount of fire debris that crushed the side of the building caused it to collapse.
WHY (or who) would have planted explosives in WTC7? lol.
Aqueous foam is used for both blast attenuation and noise suppression. The technology was developed by Sandia (see also Military Defense Law web page) and is generally a military and law enforcement technology. Some pertinent references are:
1. Raspet, R., "The Reduction of Blast Noise with Aqueous Foam"
J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 74, (6), 1757-1763 (1983)
2. Aubert, J.H., Kraynik, A.M., and Rand, P.B., "Aqueous Foams"
Scientific American, May, 1986, page 74ff
3. Clark, C.J., U.S. Patent 4,589,341, May 20, 1986
Method for Explosive Blast Control Using Expanded Foam
4. Raspet, R., "The Reduction of Blast Overpressures from Aqueous Foam in a Rigid Confinement"
Applied Acoustics, 22, 35-45 (1987)
5. "Attenuation of Blast Waves Using Foam and Other Material"
Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, IL, 1988
(Available from NTIS, ADA203148)
originally posted by: CALGARIAN
The MASSIVE amount of fire debris that crushed the side of the building caused it to collapse.
Other than initiating the fires in WTC 7, the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
Do you actually have any evidence for these claims? I would like to see it.