WTC-7 Mysteries FINALLY Solved.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Now, let's take a look at some real numbers.

Those number mean absolutely nothing.

Most of those people probably have Government contracts and dare not speak out.

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: skyeagle409

Now, let's take a look at some real numbers.

Those number mean absolutely nothing.

Most of those people probably have Government contracts and dare not speak out.

Are you saying that all but 29 of the 123,000 structural engineers have government contracts? That means that 99.98% of the structural engineers in the society have government contacts and are afraid to speak out.

I think your claim is baseless and a sign of desperation to give credence to an irrelevant fringe organization that is led by a person who is in it for the money and scams good intentioned but technically ignorant citizens.

a reply to: pteridine

I think your claim is baseless and a sign of desperation to give credence to an irrelevant fringe organization that is led by a person who is in it for the money and scams good intentioned but technically ignorant citizens.

That is not a fact but your "opinion".

a reply to: Informer1958

Those number mean absolutely nothing.

In that case, why did you post your numbers?

Most of those people probably have Government contracts and dare not speak out.

Either post the evidence or I will simply consider your comment baseless.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Either post the evidence or I will simply consider your comment baseless.

Consider what you like, I only gave my "opinion" on the said topic.

Just like you do most of the time.

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: skyeagle409

Either post the evidence or I will simply consider your comment baseless.

Consider what you like, I only gave my "opinion" on the said topic.

Just like you do most of the time.

A&E has nothing but opinions to give, so you are in good company.

a reply to: pteridine

A&E has nothing but opinions to give, so you are in good company.

That is your "opinion".

originally posted by: Informer1958
I only gave my "opinion" on the said topic.

Which as we have all seen, that is all truthers have, opinions, without any facts to back those opinions up!

a reply to: hellobruce

Which as we have all seen, that is all truthers have, opinions, without any facts to back those opinions up!

That is a load of crock.

Do you have anything to add to this thread besides snide remarks?

a reply to: Informer1958

He is correct. Do you remember the 9/11 truther claim regarding the red/gray chips?

a reply to: skyeagle409

He is correct. Do you remember the 9/11 truther claim regarding the red/gray chips?

No he is not.

This thread is not about what you and hellobruce think about Truthers.

Please stay on topic about WTC 7

a reply to: Informer1958

Please stay on topic about WTC 7

I can go for that. Now, let's go here.

Footage that kills the conspiracy theories:
Unseen 9/11 footage shows WTC Building 7 consumed by fire

The video shows up-close shots of the lower floors of World Trade Center Building 7, located just across the street from the Twin Towers, and focuses in on the exterior metal beams of Building 7 as they begin to buckle as they are overheated. The buckling led to floors falling in on one another, causing the building to collapse.

Though the entirety of the collapse is not shown in the video, it does show how there is legitimacy to the explanation provided by the government's 9/11 Commission investigation.

The video was made by a local news reporter and was released through a Freedom of Information Act request.

www.dailymail.co.uk...

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: LaBTop

A false flag operation orchestrated by the Pentagon.

Actually, that is false and my Wing Commander, who was inside the Pentagon when American 77 struck, would object to your post as well.

Of course your Wing Commander would object to the post--he works for the Pentagon, a most deceptive organization.

Deceptive groups ALWAYS object when the simple truth is told, deceptive individuals too.

911 was absolutely a False Flag operation, by any standard one chooses to use. It has given us 13 years of war with no end in sight.

originally posted by: pteridine

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: skyeagle409

Either post the evidence or I will simply consider your comment baseless.

Consider what you like, I only gave my "opinion" on the said topic.

Just like you do most of the time.

A&E has nothing but opinions to give, so you are in good company.

A&E offers informed opinions, and much more. That is why their material is so persuasive to a curious person like me. They offer a science based analysis.

The government, on the other hand, offers nonsense that is contradicted by the facts.

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Informer1958
I only gave my "opinion" on the said topic.

Which as we have all seen, that is all truthers have, opinions, without any facts to back those opinions up!

The WTC dust-signature is not an opinion, it's a well established fact.

Also, you folks were unable to explain why the dust is composed of 30% mineral wool and iron only. Everybody with a working brain should be able to see indicators for explosions if they hit 'em in the face.

Liars on the other hand, choose to deny facts if they don't fit their beloved 911myths. What else is there left to say now?

originally posted by: Salander

originally posted by: pteridine

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: skyeagle409

Either post the evidence or I will simply consider your comment baseless.

Consider what you like, I only gave my "opinion" on the said topic.

Just like you do most of the time.

A&E has nothing but opinions to give, so you are in good company.

A&E offers informed opinions, and much more. That is why their material is so persuasive to a curious person like me. They offer a science based analysis.

The government, on the other hand, offers nonsense that is contradicted by the facts.

A&E offers bad science. Jones is deluded. He thinks he understands analytical chemistry and the scientific method. His arguments are invalid, as has been shown many times. The constant A&E denials of the fact that steel is weakened by fire show that their engineers are blinded by the desire for a conspiracy and will ignore reality to get to their fantasy land. Gage is in it for the money and will ride the money train until the wheels fall off; check their IRS filings on the disposition of funds that the suckers sent to them. Who gets paid a salary to propagate the A&E mantra?

There is absolutely no evidence of planned demolitions.

originally posted by: PublicOpinion

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Informer1958
I only gave my "opinion" on the said topic.

Which as we have all seen, that is all truthers have, opinions, without any facts to back those opinions up!

The WTC dust-signature is not an opinion, it's a well established fact.

Also, you folks were unable to explain why the dust is composed of 30% mineral wool and iron only. Everybody with a working brain should be able to see indicators for explosions if they hit 'em in the face.

Liars on the other hand, choose to deny facts if they don't fit their beloved 911myths. What else is there left to say now?

Mineral wool is evidence of explosives? The attics of America are under attack!

a reply to: pteridine

Indicator and evidence, you can't tell the difference?
Obviously not, but why should I expect anything else after your take on Newtons Laws.

A&E offers bad science.

At least they offer science. Others offered lies and confusion only thus far.
More horseshoe-bending, please. Carry on!

a reply to: PublicOpinion

Also, you folks were unable to explain why the dust is composed of 30% mineral wool and iron only. Everybody with a working brain should be able to see indicators for explosions if they hit 'em in the face.

We all seen a lot of dust.
If you are saying that 30% of all that dust is residue of explosives then there must have been hundreds of tons of explosives used.
Not believable.

a reply to: samkent

If you are saying that 30% of all that dust is residue of explosives then there must have been hundreds of tons of explosives used.
Not believable.

If I was saying that, which I didn't.

Would you care to elaborate why the fireproofing and big chunks of iron were found on top of the debris? With all that asbestos, of course.

Go for the findings or put up something else, please!