Ukrainian Government Acknowledges that Some of Its Leaders Are Nazis

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

The answers to both of your questions are extremely obvious.

a reply to: YouPeople

The answers to both of your questions are extremely obvious.

And yet you didn't answer either one.

Surprising...not at all.

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

No not "and yet".

"therefore" I didn't answer them.

a reply to: YouPeople

"therefore" I didn't answer them.

I didn't think you were going to...but I had to ask.

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

I am not interested in playing your pathetic little games. So corny too, damn....

The information I wanted to share has been posted. If you have anything direct to say about it, then do so.

Otherwise, move along.

a reply to: YouPeople

I am not interested in playing your pathetic little games. So corny too, damn....

So asking for a source is playing a pathetic little game...just so you know that is what you do here at ATS, you post your sources.

The information I wanted to share has been posted. If you have anything direct to say about it, then do so.

Asking for a source is directly related to your information...so again source where you got that info?

Can't get anymore direct than that.

Otherwise, move along.

Good luck with that happening.

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: YouPeople

I am not interested in playing your pathetic little games. So corny too, damn....

So asking for a source is playing a pathetic little game...just so you know that is what you do here at ATS, you post your sources.

The information I wanted to share has been posted. If you have anything direct to say about it, then do so.

Asking for a source is directly related to your information...so again source where you got that info?

Can't get anymore direct than that.

Otherwise, move along.

Good luck with that happening.

It was from a MY times article I believe and he didn't want you to see what they said about Putin.

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

Figure it out yourself, Sherlock.

a reply to: dragonridr

It was from a by times article I believe and he didn't want you to see what they said about Putin.

Funny since I was the only one who posted a working link to the article.

originally posted by: YouPeople
a reply to: dragonridr

It was from a by times article I believe and he didn't want you to see what they said about Putin.

Funny since I was the only one who posted a working link to the article.

Did you read this in the article by chance

Text Russia had maneuvered aggressively to derail Ukraine’s accords ahead of a European Union conference in Vilnius, Lithuania, last month, where Mr. Yanukovich was expected to sign them. The Kremlin threatened draconian economic sanctions that could have devastated Ukraine’s already battered economy.

Mr. Putin and other senior officials, however, had insisted that they were merely pointing out necessary steps that Russia would take to protect its economic interests. They accused Western powers of interfering in Ukraine’s affairs after refusing to accept that Russia had won by making a persuasive case.

The unrest in Ukraine, which was further animated by a violent crackdown by the police on demonstrators on Nov. 30, has been driven largely by a sense of betrayal among protesters who had been assured by Mr. Yanukovich that their country was drawing closer to Europe politically and economically.

See how Russian actions directly lead to the protests? And to make things worse putin made threats instead of nogotiate. Drove the people away as they saw Russia as a threat.

a reply to: YouPeople

Figure it out yourself, Sherlock.

No need as if it comes from you it will have at least one thing...blame the US.

But so you understand your sources are proof you didn't just type it up yourself, but who need to follow the rules right...

a reply to: dragonridr

Did you read this in the article by chance

Did you forget you just made a wild accusation and were proven wrong?

No not by chance, I fully intended to read the whole article and so I did.

a reply to: YouPeople

Did you forget you just made a wild accusation and were proven wrong?

By who?

No not by chance, I fully intended to read the whole article and so I did.

So you have read it...did you understand it?

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

If you want to keep up the charade, even after I just said that I did in fact post a link to the article, a working one I might add, unlike another poster, then sure, why not.

Now where could the missing link be? What a mystery. Don't you have a raging clue yet?

originally posted by: YouPeople
a reply to: dragonridr

Did you read this in the article by chance

Did you forget you just made a wild accusation and were proven wrong?

No not by chance, I fully intended to read the whole article and so I did.

Then you see maiden was directly caused by Put in threats. And it was him that caused the protests by his attempts to thwart they signing a trade deal. And this worse told them he would destroy their economy. And you wonder why Ukrainians didn't run to Russia with open arms.

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

By who?

How many people were talking to him just now?

So you have read it...did you understand it?

Yes.

Companies in Russia don't launder their money.......they have to make it dirty in order to partake of the official policy of corruption!

a reply to: dragonridr

It was the opposition and the influence of outside forces that caused the protests. Apparently the legitimate government had chosen Russia because they offered a better deal, and they were against it.

It's not like their was a consensus in the whole country about choosing for the EU.

I am sure that dirty games were being played by whatever party to secure their interests.

a reply to: YouPeople

Inthis post you claimed the quote was "complete BS" and challenge for a source - and there it is.

There are multiple links to other news sources publishing the same quote at het google link I gave if the NYT one doesn't work for you.

a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul

No they didn't your wrong Russian deal fell through

I don't see anything that says that the Russian deal "fell through". It didn't. It was put into effect up until the coup happened.

There are multiple links to other news sources publishing the same quote at het google link I gave if the NYT one doesn't work for you.

What is your obsession with that qoute? Yes, the opposition leader didn't like the deal. Had he actually been in the government he could've done something about it.