Apollo astronauts bizarre reaction to hoax questions

This is to continue on the subject of Apollo astronauts reacting to Bart Sibrel after he brought up the hoax question...

One case is Apollo astronaut Ed Mitchell, who made a death threat to Sibrel as he was about to leave Mitchell's property...

choos said,,

"did Mitchell grab his gun?? did he call the CIA?? no, they were empty threats to get him off the property and stay away.. a concept you cant comprehend."

the difference between the death threat you posted and this threat is that there is no intention on following through with action at all.. "

In fact, such cases don't require any intention to follow through with action.

Some death threats have the intention of being followed through, while others do not. But they are all considered to be death threats, and they are all treated as being death threats.

The example I cited did not intend to be followed through, as it was entirely fabricated, and nobody was trying to kill the person.

It was still a death threat, same as Mitchell's was.

That's the problem here....

You've already been defending Sibrel's ill-mannered, criminal behavior in another thread for some time...Did we really need a whole new thread about it? Especially one with no sources, in which you quote another members' reply from the other thread?

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
You've already been defending Sibrel's ill-mannered, criminal behavior in another thread for some time...Did we really need a whole new thread about it? Especially one with no sources, in which you quote another members' reply from the other thread?

You go gurl! You should apply as a mod?

a reply to: proob4

I'm not a gurl, and hell no! I wouldn't wish that fate on anybody lol.

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: proob4

I'm not a gurl, and hell no! I wouldn't wish that fate on anybody lol.

Wow! All this time i thought you was a female?

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
You've already been defending Sibrel's ill-mannered, criminal behavior in another thread for some time...Did we really need a whole new thread about it? Especially one with no sources, in which you quote another members' reply from the other thread?

This is about the reaction of Apollo astronauts to Bart Sibrel, who questioned them on the hoax issue.

His crime was jumping on a car, and I've never defended him or his actions. It was stupid.


I've shown the sources in that thread, and you seem aware of the issue.... you should also know I've shown all the sources, then....


I can repost anything, if you need a refresher, on the specific points....


The video is my source - have you not seen it?

The video 'Astronaut's Gone Wild' is the actual source, for the Mitchell case I'm referring to...

Mitchell is shown making a threat to shoot Sibrel, after he's left the house, and is just about to drive away...

Mitchell knew Sibrel was already leaving, by that point. The fact Sibrel had left his house, and were putting their gear into their vehicle, are very obvious clues, I'd say ...


You cannot make any sense of it. But it makes perfect sense, actually.

Sibrel was about to drive away. Mitchell knew that, obviously. Beyond any doubt, Mitchell knew that. He was there, at the time, while they were putting their gear into their vehicle...

THIS is when Mitchell made his threat to shoot Sibrel.

Mitchell threatened to shoot him.....before he leaves.


This has nothing to do with getting him off the property, and you know it.

originally posted by: turbonium1
The video is my source - have you not seen it?

I see no video. I see no source. I really have no idea what the point of your thread is even.
Edit: You named your source .. it's an hour long it seems, what time does it start?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

If you feel like playing catch-up, look over the last few pages of this thread, where the OP has spent a considerable amount of time defending Sibrel's criminal actions and clinging to irrational conclusions.

a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

Honestly not very interested in catchup due to OP's crap thread attempt, and his obvious agenda.

Thank you though.

originally posted by: proob4

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: proob4

I'm not a gurl, and hell no! I wouldn't wish that fate on anybody lol.

Wow! All this time i thought you was a female?

Uh...I'm not quite sure what to say to that....lol...
But nope, not female.

a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

Must be your oh so feminine AV.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Now my avatar is feminine? I...I don't know what to think anymore...

a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

That was the joke .. it's not.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I know...hence the

These smilies suck lol.

a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

Good thing the Beer emote can't be mistaken!

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: turbonium1
The video is my source - have you not seen it?

I see no video. I see no source. I really have no idea what the point of your thread is even.
Edit: You named your source .. it's an hour long it seems, what time does it start?

The Ed Mitchell interview is near the end of the video, but it's available as one clip, too. Search ed mitchell bart sibrel, and you'll get it.

But it seems you don't care about discussing the issue, so I wonder why are you even here....

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

That stands for and is used for beer?
Hmmm, I'll have to dump out all My Pills,
from My Glass Mug here at home I guess...

a reply to: turbonium1

Saw that video a while back and thought Sibrel on target. The late reaction from Mitchell was odd to say the least... It made my Conspiritorial/Cynical Mind flash!!...