It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Most of the NIST videos have been tampered with having key moments removed and sound cut.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Shadow Herder
Most of the NIST videos have been tampered with having key moments removed and sound cut.
I think you mean ALL of the truthers videos have been tampered with.
.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
From the NIST Report on WTC 7....
" Blast from the smallest charge capable of failing a critical column (i.e., Column 79) would have resulted in a sound level of 130dB to 140dB at a distance of at least half a mile if unobstructed by surrounding buildings (such as a long Greenwich Street and West Broadway). This sound level is comparable to a gunshot blast, standing next to a jet plane engine and more than 10 times louder than being in front of the speakers at a rock concert. The sound from such a blast in an urban setting would have been reflected and channeled down streets with minimum attenuation. However, the soundtracks from videos being recorded at the time of the collapse did not contain any sound as intense as would have accompanied such a blast"
So, again, live by the NIST report, die by the NIST report. So, now we have the FDNY saying no explosions that indicated a bomb or demolition charge and we have NIST saying the same thing....well then there are the live recordings that exist in the archives of NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN and FOX all which carried it live and had no explosions heard....then there is you Shadow, clinging to this idea that Silverstein ordered his demolition Supermen to break through the NYPD/FDNY cordon to run into the building and plant your miracle Hush a Boom explosives.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
Tested blast scenarios.
Considerable effort was expended to compile evidence and to determine whether intentionally set
explosives might have caused the collapse of WTC 7 . As a minimum, the explosive material would have had to cause sufficient damage to a critical column or truss that it became unable to carry its service load or that a lateral deflection would cause it to buckle.
Six combinations of explosive location and column/truss sections and two implementation scenarios were
considered. In the first scenario, there was ample time for optimized preparation of the structure (including possible preliminary cutting of structural members) and use of the minimum mass of explosives. In the second scenario, the explosive charge was to be placed in the shortest possible time, which was to be no more than a 7 h to 8 h time frame.
Simulations were performed for differing degrees of partitioning of a tenant floor. Attention focused on a single hypothetical blast scenario. This scenario involved preliminary cutting of Column 79 and the use of 4 kg (9 lb) of RDX explosives in linear shaped charges. The other scenarios would have required more explosives, or were considered infeasible to accomplish without detection.
originally posted by: scottyirnbru
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
From the NIST Report on WTC 7....
.
I'm done with this thread. He's reposts the same stuff again and again and refuses to answer any question posed of him. He'd be better off with a blog instead of a forum.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
originally posted by: scottyirnbru
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
From the NIST Report on WTC 7....
.
I'm done with this thread. He's reposts the same stuff again and again and refuses to answer any question posed of him. He'd be better off with a blog instead of a forum.
Are you sure, it is the only thread you have posted on since June. What will you do? Is 911 debunking all you try to do?
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
I don't think its an inside job if WTC 7 was controlled demolition.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
I don't think its an inside job if WTC 7 was controlled demolition.
However, some people for some strange reason want to push a silly conspiracy theory that the FDNY does what civilians tell them to do, and blow up buildings! With no evidence at all.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Shadow Herder. Why do you ignore that NIST itself says no explosives were uses? Why is that?
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
No one but you is regurgitating such nonsense.
The FDNY did not implode building 7.
WTC 7 was evacuated in the A.M and no fire crews were in the building.
that they would control it collapse to protect property and life.
Charlie Chaplin looked like Hitler.
An example of the force exerted by air: