It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: scottyirnbru
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
originally posted by: scottyirnbru
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
originally posted by: scottyirnbru
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
like a directed energy weapon which can target the insides of a structure and collapse it.
One could just as truthfully say it was aliens, or UFO's even - remember someone showed a video containing a UFO over wtc 7!
Or you could say it fell over all by itself, but I doubt anyone would ever believe you. There is no reasonable explanation for the falling down of the building other than its purpose. .. . . What was in building 7 that needed getting rid of? Follow the breadcrumbs and the money trail. . . . .
You tell us. They needed to get rid of what? So who did it? How many people were involved? Why such a complex plan for the removal of one building?
I suggest some simple research into what the building was used for as a start for some good batman detective work.
Avoids offering a hypothesis because realises that it starts to get a bit flaky....
Suggesting dective work into what the building was used for is a good start, you may not like that i dont have all the answers, but every great journey begins somewhere. So think a little research may yield some of the answers which may or may not be there. Of course in dective work every stone must be overturned and looked under, wether insurance or security. A bit of Batman dectective work wouldnt hurt, actually if there was something to hide then a bit of detective work may implicate many so there may be alot to hide. . . . . Or maybe not who knows. . . . .
Just more rubbish. Offer up your idea and we'll show you where it lacks joined up thinking and we can go back and forth until you have a stronger idea. That's what a forum is for. Batman is fiction. Conspiracy theory here is fiction. Let's deal in facts.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
Then again I dont remember what the building was for
nor who had a big insurance policy on the buildings in question,
nor which families ran security.
There is a long list of things I dont know or remember,
a reply to: Shadow Herder
That's why the owner decided to pull it
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: Shadow Herder
That's why the owner decided to pull it
The owner has no influence on fire fighting operations . The fire chief has complete authority on the scene
He can have anyone removed from the scene or arrested if interfere with operations
You forget that it was Chief Nigro who called Silverstein reporting fact that fires in WTC 7 were out of control and was
being abandoned
Heres a hint it aint gonna ever happen becuase it cant happen.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: FormOfTheLord
Heres a hint it aint gonna ever happen becuase it cant happen.
Based solely on your hunch.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
fires dont cause controlled demolitions, they never have and they never will
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
fires dont cause controlled demolitions, they never have and they never will
What "controlled demolition" are you babbling about? You refuse to admit the building was severely damaged, it was bulging and creaking and groaning and burning.... The FDNY realised it was going to fall down, which it did.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
So your saying a fire can cause a building to fall as building 7 fell?
Bulging creaking and burning causes demolitions?
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
So your saying a fire can cause a building to fall as building 7 fell?
Try actually reading what I said.... why do you ignore the severe damage to WTC 7?
Bulging creaking and burning causes demolitions?
You are very confused, the building bulging was a sign of severe damage, the noises was the building getting ready to collapse due to the unchecked fires and severe damage. The FDNY knew the signs of a building getting ready to collapse, so pulled everyone away as it could not be saved, the building then collapsed.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
Severe damage from what? Fire?
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
Severe damage from what? Fire?
Severe damage done by the collapse of WTC 1 & 2, the fire that was burning unchecked inside WTC 7
Follow the links to pictures of both that have been posted in this thread.
You really do not know much about 9/11.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
so if some jet fuel stats a fire then a building falls next to another without touching it
Captain Chris Boyle Engine 94 - 18 years Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good. Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side? Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it. Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many? Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
Severe damage from what? Fire?
Severe damage done by the collapse of WTC 1 & 2, the fire that was burning unchecked inside WTC 7
Follow the links to pictures of both that have been posted in this thread.
You really do not know much about 9/11.
No one is buying what your selling, so if some jet fuel stats a fire then a building falls next to another without touching it then another will fall like a dominoe LOL, if you think that makes sense to anyone.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
so if some jet fuel stats a fire then a building falls next to another without touching it
Why tell lies? A hole 1/3 the size of the building was torn in WTC 7...
Captain Chris Boyle Engine 94 - 18 years Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good. Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side? Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it. Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many? Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it.
But you will ignore this fact, as it destroys your silly conspiracy theory!
originally posted by: wmd_2008
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
Severe damage from what? Fire?
Severe damage done by the collapse of WTC 1 & 2, the fire that was burning unchecked inside WTC 7
Follow the links to pictures of both that have been posted in this thread.
You really do not know much about 9/11.
No one is buying what your selling, so if some jet fuel stats a fire then a building falls next to another without touching it then another will fall like a dominoe LOL, if you think that makes sense to anyone.
Really no damage from the North Tower collapse.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
so if some jet fuel stats a fire then a building falls next to another without touching it
Why tell lies? A hole 1/3 the size of the building was torn in WTC 7...
Captain Chris Boyle Engine 94 - 18 years Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good. Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side? Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it. Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many? Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it.
But you will ignore this fact, as it destroys your silly conspiracy theory!
Sure there were holes all over it yep and all through it, show me a hole where is your evidence. . .
Oh wait you dont have any none whatsoeva just like I thought.
Wait while we are at it where is the plane that crashed into the pentagon?