It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Two leaked photographs show top New York Times staff in poses making fun of mass killings shortly after they happened.
An unnamed former New York Times employee provided Gawker with the photos, which were then published on Tuesday. They show an apparent disconnect between the NYT image of decorous professionalism and literal images of staff making light of mass death.
One photo shows the longtime NYT opinion page editor Andrew Rosenthal wielding a fake M16 rifle and a bottle of wine over staffers stained with fake blood, recreating the June 2001 Nepalese royal massacre. The massacre was committed by the Crown Prince Dipendra, who took the lives of nine people including the king, queen, as well as his own.
“These photos are in poor taste, not reflective of the values of The New York Times and deeply regrettable,” NYT’s publisher, Arthur Sulzberger Jr. told Gawker in a statement Tuesday morning. Schulzberg is also the Chairman of the paper’s owner, The New York Times Company.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
That is simply bizarre. I can't imagine an office dressing up with silly hats like that for any reason outside of New Years, much less to poke fun at a mass murder.
The calendar on the wall indicates that the reenactment also occurred in June 2001, when the memory of the tragedy would have still been fresh in the minds of the public.
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: schadenfreude
With staff like this, I guess they routinely mock their customers dead and live. Hopefully this will accelerate the decline of this so-called news outlet.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: NavyDoc
That is simply bizarre. I can't imagine an office dressing up with silly hats like that for any reason outside of New Years, much less to poke fun at a mass murder.
Sounds like they are making too much money at the NYT if they have time for that kind of BS.
I thought newspapers were in dire financial straits.
originally posted by: jaws1975
a reply to: intrepid
Aren't you concerned with how these photos will make the victims families feel?
Kind of cold to give it a pass just because it was pre 9/11.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: schadenfreude
With staff like this, I guess they routinely mock their customers dead and live. Hopefully this will accelerate the decline of this so-called news outlet.
Just for my reference, what political bent does this rag have?