It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A new study by the National Institute on Drug Abuse finds that drivers with blood concentrations of 13.1 ug/L THC, which is more than twice the 5 ug/L limit in Washington and Colorado, exhibit impairment similar to those with a .08 breath alcohol concentration, reports Time.
The small study of 18 occasional pot smokers between 21 and 37 involved a 45-minute driving simulator in a 1996 Malibu sedan at a University of Iowa dome. Not only did researchers test different combinations of high or low concentrations of THC, alcohol, the combination of the two, and placebos, but they also looked at 250 parameters of driving, with a focus on weaving.
While alcohol affected both lateral acceleration (weaving speed) and lane departures per minute, marijuana alone did not, reports Reason Magazine, which takes issue with current limits: “The five-nanogram cutoff in practice means that many regular cannabis consumers can never legally drive, even when they’re not impaired, which hardly seems sensible or fair.”
originally posted by: Dr1Akula
That's a propaganda against alcohol...
I've already won 11 races been drunk... in gran turismo!
Alcohol is a natural medicine... It can make you drive like Schumacher
(Or -more likely-, think you can drive like Schumacher)
Big pharma doesn't want you to know it's true medicinal purposes
originally posted by: Dr1Akula
That's a propaganda against alcohol...
I've already won 11 races been drunk... in gran turismo!
Alcohol is a natural medicine... It can make you drive like Schumacher
(Or -more likely-, think you can drive like Schumacher)
Big pharma doesn't want you to know it's true medicinal purposes
originally posted by: whyamIhere
I'll break it down...
A stoned driver thinks he's being pulled over by the street sweeper.
A drunk doesn't see and runs over and kills the street sweeper.
Any other comparison is a lie.
originally posted by: macenroe82
a reply to: Baddogma
The only reason why i mentioned it is because last week while i got my weekly monitored Sub dose and carries,
i noticed a girl get her 180 mg of method one then walk upstairs for her jib with the Dr.
She came down the stairs at the clinic about 15 minutes later. She was holding the hand rail for dear life and was visibly a complete mess. I walked out of the clinic behind her to my car and this woman was tripping over herself. She turned around and asked to bum a smoke. She had one eye looking at me, the other looking for me. She was getting the nods hard. I gave her a smoke and got in my car. I was astonished to see her unlock a car door and get in the drivers seat. I was thinkin this broad is going to kill someone leaving here like that. She backed up almost right into the car parked beside me but came to a sudden halt inches away from the front bumper, then pulled on the street.
Now ive idiotically got in the drivers seat while high on H before and had the nods to the point where i would have to hit a parking lot for a bit to puke then get on my merry way. But just like you said - im used to my dose of 24 mg of sub so it doesnt effect me when i take it.
It did cross my mind, an i thought about it all the way home.