It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
What is needed is scale.
Is it the size of a marble, a basketball, or many meters in size?
A little paint, a mouth guard and lenses it could look like a movie prop, helmet that took a hit to the jaw section since it appears to be missing.
Or it could be a molten blob formed from the ejection of an impactor far away, subjected to millions of years of fine particulate erosion to softer material blobs where what looks to us as eye sockets.
originally posted by: mblahnikluver
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: mblahnikluver
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
I agree that the upper part of it looks like a skull, but just because it looks like it does not mean that's what it is. So I'm going to have to side with logic, and say it's a rock.
Typical answer.
DO you ever think outside the box?
Quite often. I don't, however, automatically jump to far-fetched conclusions without evidence.
Far fetched? How is it far fetched? Just because it doesn't fit in with what mainstream society believes doesn't make it far fetched.
Also what do you deem as evidence? Do you need to see it yourself? I have seen plenty of pictures and read enough to have enough "evidence" for myself to believe this could be more than just some rock.
originally posted by: klassified
a reply to: mblahnikluver
Who knows what it really is, but it's quite symmetrical for just a plain old rock. S&F.
See my sig.
originally posted by: Thorneblood
a reply to: Kukri
Funny you mention that, i was thinking it would make a kick ass tombstone for my grave.
I wonder if we can get it breathe fire too...
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: mblahnikluver
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: mblahnikluver
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
I agree that the upper part of it looks like a skull, but just because it looks like it does not mean that's what it is. So I'm going to have to side with logic, and say it's a rock.
Typical answer.
DO you ever think outside the box?
Quite often. I don't, however, automatically jump to far-fetched conclusions without evidence.
Far fetched? How is it far fetched? Just because it doesn't fit in with what mainstream society believes doesn't make it far fetched.
Also what do you deem as evidence? Do you need to see it yourself? I have seen plenty of pictures and read enough to have enough "evidence" for myself to believe this could be more than just some rock.
No, the fact that it's far-fetched makes it far-fetched. You claim it's a "statue". Ok. Then there should be signs of whatever civilization made this "statue". There should be signs of infrastructure. There should be signs of habitation nearby. There are none of those things. All there is, is something that vaguely resembles a head, in the middle of a field of rocks, on a planet that we have no evidence (yet) that even microbial life ever existed. Compared to the obvious, logical conclusion that the "object" is simply rocks that vaguely resemble something, yes, it's quite far-fetched.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: klassified
a reply to: mblahnikluver
Who knows what it really is, but it's quite symmetrical for just a plain old rock. S&F.
See my sig.
But is it really symmetrical? The bottom part (the "jowls", if you will) is certainly not symmetrical with the top part. In fact, the bottom part is an amorphous blob of rock.
The top part (the part with the "eye sockets") may be symmetrical, but honestly we can't see it all to be sure. In fact, the left eye (the one on our right) looks to have some extra non-symmetrical part on the far left of it (our right).
originally posted by: borntowatch
Its not Egypt, its Mars.
Its a rock.
If there were three maybe four and they were identical.
Maybe if there were spears a few ray guns and a few chariots in disrepair, horse skeletons, swords. If in fact there was other evidence of life and or a battle, other things associated with life, a pyramid or two then I would get on board
Seriously its 99.9% a rock, you dont have the evidence to prove otherwise, you are assuming.
If it was in Egypt I would say it might be a something because I know there was and is life in Egypt, we have the proof, mars not so much
I find it strange that you think people who dont believe it is what you think it is are deluding themselves, because I think you are deluding yourself
and yes I could be wrong but that has to be proven
originally posted by: mblahnikluver
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
I agree that the upper part of it looks like a skull, but just because it looks like it does not mean that's what it is. So I'm going to have to side with logic, and say it's a rock.
Typical answer.
DO you ever think outside the box?
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
I agree that the upper part of it looks like a skull, but just because it looks like it does not mean that's what it is. So I'm going to have to side with logic, and say it's a rock.