Mars picture showing a alien, footprints, manhole cover, tent and wall painting !?

NO. It's just that the quality of investigating or pondering possible legitimate claims gets swept under the rug by shapely rocks, whereas other posts that are worthy of being on the front page, get overlooked by those who clearly ust don't want to have to think hard. They would rather look at clouds or rocks and play imaginary games with shapes. These are no more than rocks, missing information from the photo or blurriness. Yes, there's something on the rock...or directly behind it, giving the illusion that its on top of the rock.....but I assure you, it's not an alien trying to temp someone with her cleavage (forehead slap).

originally posted by: carl6405
OMG!!(Thought just entered the brain)

I haven't read through every post, so if someone already mentioned this, I apologize.

The "Mars Ghost Girl" isn't a ghost at all. The photo is translucent because she is actually moving and caused the still shot to be blurred!! Slow shutter speeds causes any moving object to come out blurred. Anyone that has used a camera knows this!

So.. if it isn't a person.. sure looks like it though.. But if it is not.. it is something else that is moving causing the image to blur! That is a fact!

It's not a strict fact while dealing with viewing other planets or solar bodies remotely. Because of the sheer distance, the "less than" HD quality of the photos, transmission times of the signal...there can be missing information that sometimes will look like a shape. Also,the quality of the image that far away can be blurry, simply because the lens cannot focus on everything at once. (kind of like in a movie, where the image in focus is clear, but the background is blurry because the lack of focus.)

some more picture have been sent down

mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

mars.jpl.nasa.gov...



fullsize

16 seconds between each shot, one slightly more contrast than the other , unsure if this is due to lighting changes *sun* or camera setting

but it appears as as before, with little change as i see

funbox

originally posted by: thorfourwinds
a reply to: Stormdancer777

Yes!

May we offer for discussion is that what we are seeing is actually a crevasse gouged out by the falling part of the rocky cornice above… perhaps merely a landslide?

All a matter of perspective, we guess, but, even blown up in the above photo, one can see what appears to be a ghostly apparition of a woman…good call, OP, whatever it is.

The truth is out there.

Or maybe, it's a Giants fist punching up through the ground....and it looks like he's giving us the "Thumbs Up"!

a reply to: funbox

Maybe "she" is a statue.

Or Martians are like cats and think if they hold real still, nobody will see them. Probably even has "her" eyes closed.

I still think it's weird

Not an expert, but I've seen a few rocks before and those are by all indications rocks...

a reply to: Stormdancer777

like a multitude of ghost pictures that have probably floated by this site

have no eg's to hand though

funbox

a reply to: Spacespider

It's very interesting, you can even see the foot prints leading down to the ledge that she is standing on, or where the shadow or mirage is located. While I really think that this is just the natural Mars landscape, I still enjoy looking at stuff like this anyway, and I am glad that certain people create threads like yours here.

You know what we really need to do? We need to get a rover that can excavate many feet below the surface of Mars in order to locate possible fossils of former life that may have existed there in the past. I mean if we were Martians, and we sent a normal Rover to explore planet Earth, we would never know that Dinosaurs existed until we sent one that could dig.

It would really be nice if one of our Mars rovers could locate a cave, and navigate it long enough to look around before any solar power was lost. That may have been the last shelter that any kind of alien like intelligence dwelt in. ~$heopleNation

The woman is a rockslide. Even the horizontal bands of sand/soil in the cliff face can be seen bending down towards the rockslide over it's width. The source is the cliff above. Looks like simple geology to me. Stuff you can see anywhere in Zion or Sedona. Probably, not with an image of a woman though... it is cool.

a reply to: Spacespider

In my humble opinion that is a gigantic streeeeeeeeeeeeetch!
You have nothing to give scale to anything. Those rocks could be miles or inches wide. That rock that looks like a tent, doesn't. A wrench, really? That smudge that appears to be a cleavage clad woman, isn't, unless she's a frost giant (or frost feiry). Do you even know how cold it is out there? And the footprints? Those could be just as easily a collection of rock candy scattered all about.

Ghost Girl is kinda strange looking. Blurry while everything else wasn't? Sure, it's probably a rock...but what if??

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Spacespider

I disagree.

That's perfectly fine, but until it is proven otherwise the rocks on Mars are just that "Rocks".

But I guess your way of thinking is the most easy way.

Well as I just said...until proven otherwise it is, and most logical.

I am just pointing things out, keeping a open mind.

I have an open mind, but it is not so open that when I see a rock I call it a painting, footprints, a house or tent, or even a living being without actually having something to corroborate what I am seeing.

And your thread just doesn't do that...sorry.

But if it was NASA saying they WERE those things you would be right on board, and you KNOW IT.

So ultimately, you are just a follower, and actually think you *know* anything actually about it.

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Spacespider

I disagree.

That's perfectly fine, but until it is proven otherwise the rocks on Mars are just that "Rocks".

But I guess your way of thinking is the most easy way.

Well as I just said...until proven otherwise it is, and most logical.

I am just pointing things out, keeping a open mind.

I have an open mind, but it is not so open that when I see a rock I call it a painting, footprints, a house or tent, or even a living being without actually having something to corroborate what I am seeing.

And your thread just doesn't do that...sorry.

But if it was NASA saying they WERE those things you would be right on board, and you KNOW IT.

So ultimately, you are just a follower, and actually think you *know* anything actually about it.

...Except NASA would never say something so ludicrous. Nice ad-hominem attacks, though.

a reply to: Spacespider

The ghost looking woman is pretty interesting!

a reply to: Spacespider

REALLY! Interesting and though provoking. But maybe just the way we see things shades our minds' eye's point of view?

Great share my friend.

a reply to: ParasuvO

But if it was NASA saying they WERE those things you would be right on board, and you KNOW IT.

And would you be the one saying..."Their Lying"

You would be and you KNOW IT.

So ultimately, you are just a follower, and actually think you *know* anything actually about it.

Tell you what prove to me they aren't rocks, then you can say I think I know about them...until then guess what this follower sees nothing but rocks.

But feel free to show me the evidence they are something other than "ROCKS".

Looks like a legit alien woman to me FTW!

a reply to: combatmaster

I would like to read more theories on why this part(Ghost girl) of the photo is the only part that is blurry/translucent.