It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Calling out Clinton for being wishy-washy on the TPP, Sanders says: 'If she’s against this, we need her to speak out.'
"This vote is the whole ballgame," Campaign for America's Future fellow Dave Johnson wrote earlier this week, referring to Fast Track, or trade promotion authority, which the U.S. House of Representatives is expected to take up on Friday. "It won’t matter what Clinton might say later about TPP, because Wall Street and the giant multinational corporations will do what it takes to make sure it will pass the Republican House and Senate."
"What is the secretary’s point of view on that?" he asked of the act that he voted against.
In a separate article, the Times reports that in her kick-off speech on Saturday, Clinton "will directly address concerns that have emerged in the early weeks of her candidacy, telling voters they can trust her to fight for the middle class and stressing that she cares about their problems."
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: FyreByrd
Why don't Bernie tell us what's in it then?
Same with all the rest who have read it but say they are forbidden to talk about it! That would be a shoo in for anyone who is running to say FU to Obama and tell us serfs what the bill actually will do to destroy our economy!
Waiting.....................
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: FyreByrd
Why don't Bernie tell us what's in it then?
Same with all the rest who have read it but say they are forbidden to talk about it! That would be a shoo in for anyone who is running to say FU to Obama and tell us serfs what the bill actually will do to destroy our economy!
Waiting.....................
And what good would come of him being arrested and jailed.
Go elsewhere please....
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: FyreByrd
Why don't Bernie tell us what's in it then?
Same with all the rest who have read it but say they are forbidden to talk about it! That would be a shoo in for anyone who is running to say FU to Obama and tell us serfs what the bill actually will do to destroy our economy!
Waiting.....................
And what good would come of him being arrested and jailed.
Go elsewhere please....
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: FyreByrd
Why don't Bernie tell us what's in it then?
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: FyreByrd
Why don't Bernie tell us what's in it then?
Because he would be arrested and charged with some very serious crimes.
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: FyreByrd
Why don't Bernie tell us what's in it then?
Because he would be arrested and charged with some very serious crimes.
Which is what is the saddest thing ever. Secrecy contracts can be legally binding to prison time. There is no secret you tell that should send you to prison when it comes to business, if it's a secret, someone somewhere knows it and will benefit most likely.
originally posted by: beezzer
And they are doing it opening while keeping the details secret for 6 years after it is approved.
Liberty is dead.
Welcome to the police-state.
Brought to you by a few friendly corporate sponsors.
Many of the provisions will not only be secret before the vote in the House, but will also be kept secret for four years after the bill is signed. That means we won’t know what’s in it even after it’s passed.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: FyreByrd
If this "law" affects everyone, then shouldn't we know what's in it?
If there's nothing bad in it, then there's no reason to hide what's in it.
Right?
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: FyreByrd
Why don't Bernie tell us what's in it then?
Same with all the rest who have read it but say they are forbidden to talk about it! That would be a shoo in for anyone who is running to say FU to Obama and tell us serfs what the bill actually will do to destroy our economy!
Waiting.....................
No - but I do oppose deliberate and obtuse derailment of a topic. I do oppose - non-constructive drivel only meant to side track those who might be interested in a 'news development'.
I do opposed posts that are contrary just to be negitive and contrary and in the course of reading and commenting just ignore such. But when a simple thread is turned into an off-topic rant about whatever I will respond.
My point is. You are free to feel and say whatever you want - but I don't want it hear and, in my understanding, ATS is trying to discourage just such behavoir.
And what good would come of him being arrested and jailed.
Go elsewhere please....
You actually support a president who would jail a sitting congressman/senator for telling the people the truth?
Go elsewhere please? WTF does that even mean? Are you a fascist who opposes free thought and opinion?
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: mOjOm
And they are doing it opening while keeping the details secret for 6 years after it is approved.
Liberty is dead.
Welcome to the police-state.
Brought to you by a few friendly corporate sponsors.
originally posted by: mOjOm
We need to make it clear that anyone who votes yes on this thing gets lynched. No trial, no forgiveness, straight up lynched in public. Who voted which way will be the determining factor. Vote yes and you're in deep sh*t up to your eye balls. Vote no and we let ya go.
They are selling out every person in this nation. They are giving up the Sovereignty of the Nation and placing International Corps. above the authority of our own Government and it's People. (Which doesn't even seem possible legally. How is that even possible. Is that not a direct Violation of their position in office??? How is it not treason???)
Please go elsewhere if you are just trolling ....