It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Paleontologists discovered human-sized “lobsters” that lived on earth 480 million years ago, with the 7-foot sea monsters being some of the largest animals alive during that time period.
Paleontologists discovered human-sized “lobsters” that lived on earth 480 million years ago, with the 7-foot sea monsters being some of the largest animals alive during that time period. The newly-discovered marine monster, named Aegirocassis benmoulae, was discovered by Moroccan fossil hunter Mohamed Ben Moula, Sci-News reports. The finding reveals animals that were unique to any other arthropods at the time.
connecticut.cbslocal.com...
This comes as researchers discovered giant shark fossils the size of two-story buildings just outside Fort Worth, Texas. The massive predators prowled shallow sea water 100 million years ago, according to study co-author Joseph Frederickson of the University of Oklahoma. The ancient sea monster, Leptostyrax macrorhiza, may push back scientists’ estimations of when such gigantic sharks evolved, LiveScience reports. “It is also entirely possible that they may belong to an extinct shark with very small teeth so far not recognized in the present fossil record,” Shimada, who was not involved in the current study, told LiveScience. “For example, some of the largest modern-day sharks are plankton-feeding forms with minute teeth, such as the whale shark, basking shark and megamouth shark.”
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: gmoneystunt
Imagine the butter required for a 7 foot lobster.
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: gmoneystunt
Imagine the butter required for a 7 foot lobster.
I was thinking of how delicious a 3ish foot lobster tail would be...
That's a fact.
I heard somewhere for the longest time they were considered peasant food, and the wealthy didn't even want to touch them.
originally posted by: Qumulys
Remember when the Simpsons was good? Peppe... nevermind.
But you guys going on about a 7 foot meal of crustaecoliciousness, all I could think of was Pinchy!
I'll also add this one as a controversial plot device...
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: Answer
Probably pretty grainy. A lobster, even prehistoric types, which are generally larger; that large would be pretty old, I think...
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: gmoneystunt
Imagine the butter required for a 7 foot lobster.
originally posted by: BlueJacket
Ya know the larger Lobsters tend to be a bit bitter. Rule of thumb...3-5lbs is best
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I heard somewhere for the longest time they were considered peasant food, and the wealthy didn't even want to touch them.