It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: paraphi
As hard as it is, I think that the duty of the prison service is to rehabilitate where this is possible. In only a very few circumstances should life mean "life".
The issue here is whether this person had demonstrated that he had reformed and was fit for release. I do think that if this was not forthcoming he should have remained locked up as a "public threat". sadly, I think human rights activists, lawyers and do-gooders may disagree.
I am opposed to capital punishment and laugh in the face of people who think guns would actually help!
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Rehabilitation is only a bandaid when it comes to those requiring medication.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Capital punishment in this case is well warranted.
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Rehabilitation is only a bandaid when it comes to those requiring medication.
No it's not. Rehabilitation is something you do to ensure the convicted offender can re-enter society. A rapist or a car thief - it's the same principle.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Capital punishment in this case is well warranted.
No it's not. Capital punishment is never warranted.
originally posted by: paraphi
a reply to: crazyewok
Something to chew over...
> UK tariffs
I think that where possible you should leave sentencing it up to the judge within the framework of the law.
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Rehabilitation is only a bandaid when it comes to those requiring medication.
No it's not. Rehabilitation is something you do to ensure the convicted offender can re-enter society. A rapist or a car thief - it's the same principle.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Capital punishment in this case is well warranted.
No it's not. Capital punishment is never warranted.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Rehabilitation is only a bandaid when it comes to those requiring medication.
No it's not. Rehabilitation is something you do to ensure the convicted offender can re-enter society. A rapist or a car thief - it's the same principle.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Capital punishment in this case is well warranted.
No it's not. Capital punishment is never warranted.
You used the word "ensure". So...how do you ensure it? This case shows it does not work.
Can you explain why capital punishment is not warranted in this case? His first crime, he killed a pregnant girl (5 months pregnant), raped her and stomped her head, stabbed her, then set her on fire. Essentially he killed two people, the mother and the unborn son as at 5 months a kid an survive outside the womb. This case, he very likely intended to kill the girl, leaving the tip of the knife blade embedded in her skull and having to get over 140 stitches.
And you say rehab ensures they can re-enter society? Surely you are kidding......
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Rehabilitation is only a bandaid when it comes to those requiring medication.
No it's not. Rehabilitation is something you do to ensure the convicted offender can re-enter society. A rapist or a car thief - it's the same principle.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Capital punishment in this case is well warranted.
No it's not. Capital punishment is never warranted.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Can you explain why capital punishment is not warranted in this case?
originally posted by: DeepImpactX
You come across as very naive. Prisons do not rehabilitate anyone. If a prisoner wants that he has to do it himself and that's a task while they are IN prison.