It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: highfromphoenix
Hello,
Why pants, trousers, jeans, pajamas, shorts are all described as a pair is a mystery.
When I dress in ‘jeans’ I only wear one pair, why would I add the ‘s’? Same deal with trousers and every other piece of clothing I wear on my legs.
I know I have two legs but that doesn’t make sense because I also have two arms but I never say I’m going to put on my shirts if I only wear one shirt.
So why are jeans not 'jean' or pants not 'pant' is there a reason?
...The Anglicized form “pantaloon” soon appeared in English meaning “a foolish old man” (as in Shakespeare’s “lean and slippered pantaloon” from As You Like It), but the term was also applied to the Pantalone style of trousers, eventually giving us the shortened form “pants.” But “pants” in the 16th century differed from today’s jeans in that each leg was a separate garment, donned in succession and then belted together at the waist. Thus it made sense to call these “two-piece britches” a “pair” of pants, and the usage stuck long after pants were unified. We speak of “a pair” of shorts or swimming trunks because of the precedent set by “pants.”
originally posted by: corblimeyguvnor
a reply to: IAMTAT
they do?
2nd Line
(obviously from different countries, what is your definition of a pant suit, explain please so i can have a laugh, no embarrassment intended, we speak the same but don't if you get my gist)
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: corblimeyguvnor
a reply to: IAMTAT
they do?
2nd Line
(obviously from different countries, what is your definition of a pant suit, explain please so i can have a laugh, no embarrassment intended, we speak the same but don't if you get my gist)
I'm sorry, I don't understand your question. Forgive me.
en.wikipedia.org...