It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: yuppa
California dont really have a water crisis. IF they decided to stop protecting that stupid "smelt" fish that woudnt effect the environment if it went extinct.
Turning off the pumps that serve the state and federal water projects wasted about 800,000 acre-feet of water in 2013 "based on the science of four buckets of minnows. That is enough water to produce crops on 200,000 acres or 10 million tons of tomatoes; 200 million boxes of lettuce; 20 million tons of grapes."
originally posted by: trifecta
The same transparent formula and model of misdirection, false flag, and terror, they've been using religiously since the turn of the century.
originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
This is bad, but does anyone else find it extremely weird that California is having such a drought, with no way to get water??
Traffic ticket cameras are a sure thing though, and monitoring a boring inflatable dam might be a waste of a camera or two.. Sheesh..
originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
Yes, but it is not raining JUST in California. ....and all of a sudden, after generation after generation...the water works just stop?
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
On topic if someone has done this they should present themselves for a lobotomy .....
originally posted by: proteus33
a reply to: Snarl
who would benefit from this loss
originally posted by: proteus33
who wpuld benifit from this loss water bottlers like nestle maybe? i doubt it was kids and why would you use can inflatable dam?
originally posted by: sean
So if a local did it, do they not understand they too will be paying more for less. Idiots.