Patent to prevent cancer and neurodegenerative diseases

Hi all,

Ever since I read in a newspaper years ago that 1 out of 3 Australians would get cancer in their life times (I believe it has now been revised to 1 out of 2 Aussies), I have been on this ATS website subscribing to every anti-cancer thread I can find. Anything I see on the web that is Anti-cancer I save.

So my Dad sent me an email the other day containing this patent.

www.google.com...

Titled: Unifying mechanism and methods to prevent cancer and neurodegenerative diseases

The email he received is from a fellow conspiracy theorist who believes there are conspiracies involving chemtrails and population control.

The below is the email I received word for word. Sounds very interesting. I did change his name to ANONYMOUS though.

Subject: Interesting explanation about how Cancer and Parkinson start. Prevention and Cure are descripted.

Dear All,

The patent on the prevention/treatment of cancer (and some neurodegenerative
diseases) with Acetyl Cysteine and Melatonin is here:
www.google.com...

In this brilliant patent the inventors describe a universal cancer
mechanism and the chemicals required to prevent cancer or heal cancer in
case of advanced disease. The drugs combination here described, allegedly
also prevents and cure some neurodegenerative diseases such Parkinson and
Alzheimer.

In practice, the medication that is the object of this patent is a
combination of 1-2 grams of Acetyl-Cisteine and 3 to 20 mg of Melatonin.
Resveratrol (in grams if orally, milligrams if IV ) and Lipoic acid (in
milligrams) can be added too. The ideal form of administration is most
likely to be Intra Venous because at the best of my knowledge, gastric acids
destroy complex molecules such Resveratrol when taken orally without
alcohol. However, Melatonin and Acetyl Cysteine undoubtedly work also
orally.

How believable is this patent? While I invite not to dream too much because
patents become credible only after that at least one peer reviewed study
proves their validity, I think it may be substantially beneficial because
I have a friend who is oncologist in Italy who succesfully experimented 2-5
mg Melatonin/day on his Breast and Intestine Cancer patients (thousands)
already in 1997. At that time, he told me that oral Melatonin extended 15%
the life expectancy of his patients. This means that at least one component
of the remedy has been proven to be substantially effective.

My personal conclusion after observing real cancer cases in which patients
were given Melatonin between 2mg and 5mg/day is that someone should also
dramatically change their nutritional habits by removing all drinks and
foods that a great number of independent researchers believe are direct
and/or indirect root cause of cancer. Another important weapon against
cancer is having a functional immune system.

Possible Side Effects of Melatonin and Acetyl-Cisteine: Melatonin induces
deep relaxation and sleep. It must be taken 2 hours before bed time (e.g.
8.30PM for 10.30PM) and after having taken it even one night only, your
brain will feel the need of sleeping at 10.30PM also the following days.
Melatonin resets the Circadian Cycle and the need for sleep is when
Melatonin concentration is high in the brain. In many people, Melatonin
induces deep sleep till morning and then they wake up feeling good and
rested. However, some people feel sleepy also during the day. Others found
that Melatonin activated latent Herpes 1 and 2 viruses causing mild skin
eruptions. Melatonin is a hormon that has certainly some deep impact on
serotonine levels, the immune system as well as how cells membranes work in
matter of ionic exchange. Acetyl-Cisteine fluidifies mucus and enters a
number of cellular processes. Good for lungs during bronchitis and flu. It
improves the quality of nails and hair. Acetyl-Cysteine helps the liver in
detoxifying he body and it enables the process that leads to the production
of Melatonin from its precursors. Someone needs big amounts of
Acetyl-Cysteine to induce some side effect.

A modern treatment for cancer should also be associated to other benign
techniques such PEMF (Pulsating Electro-Magnetic Field). PEMF trials in
murine models have been documented by the researches of reputable
universities and the benefit in slowing down the tumour growth with just 3
minutes of exposure was classified as substantial. I have a couple of
interesting researches if someone is interested in knowing more about this
type of technology/treatment that has also beneficial effects also on other
types of health problems.



Kind regards,

ANONYMOUS

a reply to: DaRAGE

Couples are choosing to have children far later in life than our biology plans for. When kids start out 'behind the curve' there are bound to be problems. 2d and 3d order effects are widely known, but not public facing ... due to political correctness.

Chemtrails aren't necessary for population control. We're taking care of that all by ourselves.

a reply to: DaRAGE

Interesting patent on the mechanism of Reactive Oxygen Species creating damage to DNA and some methods to prevent it.

However there are other methods that exist to fight cancer, like to target cancerous cells anaerobic glycolysis, a metabolic bottleneck specic to cancerous cells.

Is it done in a people's, open source, patent? Because any other form is null and void as its slavery. I will never uphold anyone's right to patent, its theft and slavery to the human race and inventions don't belong to 1, they're given to many.

In addition, melatonin is ours, the actual resources of this planet and organic materials we are all made of, and any combinations of natural things, belong to all of us.

All he had to do was sell his own product and compete, OR share the info. And that is it.

a reply to: Unity_99

I will never uphold anyone's right to patent

If we would not allow patents, they would simply keep it confidential (another common method to protect inventions).

Patents are simply a contract with society that allow a finite time of exclusive profit in exchange for complete and public disclosure of the invention. And if you are not happy at giving royalties to the inventor, simply reproduce as you wish his publicized patent by yourself and don't give the inventor a dime. It is still his responsibility to sue you for loss of profit (if he ever learn of it)...